Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Checkmarx One comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Checkmarx are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9, while Checkmarx is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Checkmarx’s 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 51 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

2,502 Views
626 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

17,957 Views
13,468 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Checkmarx One and Check Point CloudGuard WAF compete in the security solutions segment. Check Point CloudGuard WAF appears to have a slight edge due to its comprehensive feature set, though Checkmarx One stands out for its user experience and support.

Features: Checkmarx One offers seamless integration, detailed code analysis, and a user-friendly interface for enhancing security processes. Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced threat prevention, real-time traffic analysis, and strong protection through extensive monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could improve vulnerability reporting accuracy, increase feature set depth, and enhance scalability for larger enterprises. Check Point CloudGuard WAF users seek better flexibility in configuration settings, enhanced reporting detail, and optimization of resource usage to meet growing demands.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One is favored for straightforward deployment and responsive support, easing adoption. Check Point CloudGuard WAF's deployment is more complex, but users benefit from robust customer service, although it may require more technical expertise at setup.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is seen as cost-effective with lower setup costs, making it attractive for budget-conscious users and providing a satisfactory ROI. Check Point CloudGuard WAF has higher initial costs, but its extensive features justify the expense for many users who prioritize a long-term ROI despite the upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers 70-90% ROI by enhancing security, reducing costs, and improving NIST compliance and efficiency.

Sentiment score

5.6

Checkmarx One enhances security by automating vulnerability detection, reducing costs, and improving development efficiency through CI/CD integration.

When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.

Thanos Constantopoulos

Manager, Managed Security Services at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Overall, between the fast scanning, automation, automatic reporting, and easy detection, it has reduced manual effort enough that we did not need an extra reviewer, even as our codebase or team size grew.

Swetha Dhanasekar

Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Based on my interactions with the clients, I can tell that there is a return on investment because if something is not profitable and it's not helping to save costs or vulnerabilities, clients wouldn't come back to renew their license year after year.

Gideon Anichi

Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.3

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers strong support with skilled staff, though response times and performance could improve.

Sentiment score

7.0

Checkmarx One support is praised for quick responses and knowledgeable staff, despite some reporting delays in technical support.

They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

If you raise a support case with Checkmarx, it is handled smoothly.

RiteshWalia

ML Engineer - Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The customer support team is amazing and they provide on-phone call, email support, and on-website support.

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

I have relied on Checkmarx One customer support hundreds of times for several things, and Checkmarx One support is very proactive and very responsive.

Gideon Anichi

Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is praised for seamless scalability, adaptability, and multi-cloud compatibility, with flexible traffic-based licensing.

Sentiment score

7.0

Checkmarx One is scalable for large workloads, but some users report challenges with configurations and licensing requirements.

If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.

Ruben Ruiz

Sr. VP of Creative & Development at a non-tech company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Approximately four billion lines of code are being scanned monthly.

Ricardo Sousa da Silva

Cyber Security Expert at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Since it is cloud-based, the infrastructure and PaaS, IaaS, and SaaS are taken care of by the cloud marketplace.

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Checkmarx One's scalability has changed my organization because the strong collaboration between the development and security team helps us to do things much faster.

Swetha Dhanasekar

Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers impressive stability, with users praising its reliability, minimal downtime, and quick resolution of update issues.

Sentiment score

7.3

Checkmarx One is generally stable but faces issues with large codebases, memory use, and session inconsistencies.

It is very stable.

RicardoFernandes1

Team Leader, Cloudops & Cloud Architect at a consultancy with 501-1,000 employees

It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.

Rui Dias

Sysadmin at a government with 501-1,000 employees

I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine on a scale of 1 to 10 where one is low stability and 10 is high.

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues.

Ricardo Sousa da Silva

Cyber Security Expert at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Room For Improvement

Check Point CloudGuard WAF users seek cost-effectiveness, better support, enhanced performance, real-time monitoring, streamlined integration, and improved flexibility.

Checkmarx One needs enhancements in accuracy, speed, integration, UI, support, pricing, and features for enterprise usability.

The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.

Kresimir Mikolcevic

Senior Cyber Security Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.

reviewer2702679

Technical Support Executive at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Integration into the IDE being used would be beneficial so that code does not need to be uploaded to the website and an IDE-friendly report could be generated.

reviewer2783283

Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from.

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

If you can improve the speed optimization, it takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great.

Rohit Kaushish

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Setup Cost

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers extensive features and support, though pricing can be high and complex but justifiable.

Checkmarx One is often costly but provides quality and security, with costs varying by team size and selected modules.

It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.

reviewer2619747

Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.

Mantu Shaw

Project Manager at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.

Baruch Peretz

Ciso at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

For a small team under 50 developers, normal expenses come under 30 to 60K.

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Due to the number of years I've implemented Checkmarx One, there are rebates and discounts from the OEM which makes it a lot more profitable.

Gideon Anichi

Chief Technology Officer at 3CS Aquarah Limited

The pricing should be reasonable, matching what we are paying for.

Swetha Dhanasekar

Senior GenAI Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Valuable Features

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers AI-driven security, easy integration, scalability, and robust protection against cyber threats and compliance support.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive vulnerability scanning, seamless CI/CD integration, and enhances productivity with ease of use and automation.

Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.

Stilian Elenkov

Infrastructure Manager at FPMH

It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.

Domenico Cacciari

Amministratore Della Sicurezza Di Rete at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.

Charalampos Symeou

Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank

For more quotes and insights, download the Check Point CloudGuard WAF report

Since replacing the previous tool, SAST and SCA scans are conducted in a couple of minutes instead of hours or days.

Ricardo Sousa da Silva

Cyber Security Expert at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The best features Checkmarx One offers, over the past years, include broad language and technical support that Checkmarx provides, covering most languages.

RiteshWalia

ML Engineer - Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle.

Adarkum Kumar

Product security engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Checkmarx One report

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (9th)

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.2%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Checkmarx One	10.2%
Check Point CloudGuard WAF	0.5%
Other	89.3%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2751468

Assistant Manager at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Robust threat protection improves security and operational efficiency

Areas where Check Point CloudGuard WAF can improve include simple policy tuning, as the protection seems strong, though initial rule tuning can be complex. More guided workflows or templates would help speed up deployment, along with deeper integration with the DevOps pipeline, and while it handles API well, more dedicated API security would add value. In addition, it could be improved with better integration with the DevOps pipeline, more granular reporting, as the dashboards provide good high-level visibility, but sometimes digging into specific attack patterns or trends requires manual effort, and simple tuning of the ML models would be beneficial.

Read full review

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The setup cost was taken with the head of the department, who handled the pricing and everything.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

Currently, there is nothing in the areas of Check Point CloudGuard WAF that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future. If there is anything in the roadmap, I would definitely like to t...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 14% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Mend.io vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 2% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 48% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

January 2026

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

January 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One

December 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.