

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Check Point CloudGuard WAF are competitors in the cloud security market. In terms of features, Prisma Cloud seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive options and integration capabilities, while Check Point CloudGuard's strength lies in its ease of use and proactive threat detection.
Features: Prisma Cloud offers dynamic workload identity creation, application dependency mapping, and cross-cloud security with AWS integration. It supports real-time container vulnerability scanning, providing robust automation capabilities. Check Point CloudGuard WAF excels in advanced threat detection with its Intrusion Prevention Systems, anti-bot protection, and AI-driven security, ensuring secure applications and APIs with minimal configuration.
Room for Improvement: Users of Prisma Cloud suggest enhancements in documentation with real-world use cases, better integration with cloud platforms, and improved API security. Check Point CloudGuard WAF users recommend augmenting threat detection intelligence, reducing deployment costs, and enhancing mobile application management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Prisma Cloud is generally praised for its easy deployment across hybrid and public clouds, though improvements in documentation and support responsiveness are desired. Its customer service is region-dependent but mostly positive. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is appreciated for its straightforward deployment, though some report delays in support response, with proactive support during setup being a highlight.
Pricing and ROI: Prisma Cloud is seen as a premium solution with higher costs, reflecting its feature set and promising effective ROI due to operational efficiencies and licensing flexibility. Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers competitive pricing, but customers suggest it could be made more straightforward and affordable when integrating multiple solutions. Both products ensure robust security benefits, though Prisma Cloud is favored for comprehensive all-in-one capabilities, while Check Point is noted for cost-effectiveness in specific security challenges.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
It eliminates the need for additional hardware, making it a financially and technically sound investment.
Reputation and data security are the two most important things to a financial institution.
We may have prevented a security breach with remediation of the findings.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
They can respond with technical documentation or pass on the case to the next level because it requires the development of a new feature or changing a feature due to a bug.
Anywhere we raise a tech case, they revert back within an hour.
I would rate them a nine out of ten because whenever there are issues, they are able to resolve them within the timelines and SLAs.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We haven't had any issues scaling the solution.
There aren't any limits to Prisma Cloud's scalability.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
Most of the time, when the client requires data, it is not available.
The cloud environment is dynamic, so the tool must be dynamic.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
Prisma Cloud is an excellent tool.
We could have deployed the runtime monitoring with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but within our organization at our company, it was very difficult to find who would be the owner for the alerts.
Even though documentation was available, it took a while for a new person to understand what integration meant, what will be achieved after the integration, or how the integration needed to be done on the Azure or AWS side.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
The cost was not on the higher side.
If you are using a single tool like Prisma Cloud, with a single license, you can monitor all environments, such as Google Cloud, Azure, AWS, and Oracle Cloud.
It is an expensive tool.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
It provides a single pane of glass.
If I want to check how many of my S3s have encryption, I can write a Lambda function in Prisma Cloud and get that report.
Overall, the most valuable features for us in Prisma Cloud are those that provide visibility, ensure compliance with regulations, and help us align our on-premises servers and cloud environments with mandated security standards.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Check Point CloudGuard WAF | 2.6% |
| Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks | 2.0% |
| Other | 95.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 56 |
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.
What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides comprehensive cloud-native security solutions. It covers dynamic workload identity, automated forensics, and multi-cloud protection, ensuring robust security across diverse cloud platforms.
Prisma Cloud delivers advanced capabilities for managing cloud security across AWS, Azure, and GCP platforms. It offers dynamic workload identity creation, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. With automation, centralized dashboards, and enhanced visibility, users effectively manage security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities. While optimizing cloud environments through runtime protection and compliance, Prisma Cloud faces challenges with its navigation, pricing, and limited automation capabilities. Users seek improvements in API security, role-based access controls, and documentation quality, emphasizing the need for enhanced customization and reporting features.
What are the important features of Prisma Cloud?
What benefits or ROI should users consider in reviews?
Industries like finance and telecom rely on Prisma Cloud for managing cloud security posture and container security. Teams utilize its capabilities across hybrid and multi-cloud settings to ensure compliance and robust threat protection. Features like misconfiguration detection and runtime monitoring are critical in promoting security objectives in these sectors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.