Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo

Top 10 Check Point CloudGuard WAF Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point CloudGuard WAF based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube), Checkmarx One, and Imperva Application Security Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point CloudGuard WAF surpasses its competitors by delivering comprehensive threat prevention with cutting-edge machine learning, exceptional scalability, and seamless integration, ensuring robust web application protection and superior security management for businesses of all sizes.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
4.0 out of 5
SonarQube Server supports over 20 programming languages and integrates with Jenkins, offering open-source access. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF enhances security with features like Intrusion Prevention Systems, making it ideal for high-security needs despite its higher cost.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Report
SonarQube Server has a one-time setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF incurs a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SonarQube Server has a one-time setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF incurs a higher initial investment.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Checkmarx One
3.8 out of 5
Checkmarx One appeals with flexibility and customer support alongside comprehensive vulnerability detection. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF is chosen for advanced security features and automated threat prevention. Tech buyers may prefer Checkmarx for budget-friendly flexibility or Check Point for robust protection.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One Report
Checkmarx One offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF incurs higher setup costs, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF incurs higher setup costs, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Imperva Application Security Platform
4.3 out of 5
Imperva offers extensive protection features ideal for organizations needing DDoS defense across multiple environments. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF delivers strong API integration and threat protection, making it suitable for enterprises prioritizing security in public and hybrid cloud settings.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Imperva Application Security Platform Report
Imperva Application Security Platform involves an initial investment, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers a more straightforward setup process. Imperva emphasizes comprehensive coverage, while CloudGuard WAF offers quick deployment benefits.
View comparison
Pricing
Imperva Application Security Platform involves an initial investment, whereas Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers a more straightforward setup process. Imperva emphasizes comprehensive coverage, while CloudGuard WAF offers quick deployment benefits.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Azure Front Door
4.4 out of 5
Azure Front Door excels in seamless Azure integration with network traffic inspection and flexible policy assignments. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides superior security through IPS and AI-driven protection. Buyers might choose Front Door for cost-effectiveness or CloudGuard for advanced security features.
Download Azure Front Door vs. Check Point CloudGuard WAF Report
Azure Front Door setup cost is competitive, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Front Door setup cost is competitive, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves higher initial expenses, highlighting a significant pricing difference.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security offers advanced threat detection and AI analytics favored for pricing and support. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF excels in comprehensive policies and firewall capabilities, leading in feature set and value for investment despite its higher initial cost.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Report
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security may involve significant initial investments, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF is often noted for a smoother and potentially less costly setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security may involve significant initial investments, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF is often noted for a smoother and potentially less costly setup process.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
3.7 out of 5
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway excels in integration within Azure, offering auto-scaling and SSL termination. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced security features like threat prevention and bot protection. Buyers may choose Azure for cost-effectiveness and integration or opt for CloudGuard for superior security.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs compared to Check Point CloudGuard WAF, which presents a more complex setup process. Differences in setup complexity may influence cost considerations between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers a straightforward setup with competitive costs compared to Check Point CloudGuard WAF, which presents a more complex setup process. Differences in setup complexity may influence cost considerations between the two solutions.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
F5 Advanced WAF
4.3 out of 5
F5 Advanced WAF offers extensive security features with superior threat intelligence and highly adaptable integrations. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF excels in seamless cloud deployment and competitive pricing, providing strong AI insights and efficient threat protection for diverse environments.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. F5 Advanced WAF Report
F5 Advanced WAF is known for a moderate setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF typically incurs higher initial expenses. The primary distinction lies in their initial financial commitment, with Check Point often demanding a larger upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
F5 Advanced WAF is known for a moderate setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF typically incurs higher initial expenses. The primary distinction lies in their initial financial commitment, with Check Point often demanding a larger upfront investment.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
3.9 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb
3.9 out of 5
Fortinet FortiWeb excels with high throughput and diverse deployment options, making it suited for large enterprises. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers seamless API integration and advanced bot prevention, ideal for cloud environments. Both provide competitive pricing with considerations for feature differences.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Fortinet FortiWeb Report
Fortinet FortiWeb requires a significant initial investment, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiWeb requires a significant initial investment, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
AWS WAF
4.0 out of 5
AWS WAF offers cloud-native integration, automation, and scalability within the AWS ecosystem. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced security features like intrusion prevention and AI-driven analytics, ideal for comprehensive threat detection and prevention with API integration.
Download AWS WAF vs. Check Point CloudGuard WAF Report
AWS WAF offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves higher setup costs but provides additional features and tailored support, highlighting a trade-off between cost-effectiveness and enhanced functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS WAF offers a straightforward setup with lower costs, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves higher setup costs but provides additional features and tailored support, highlighting a trade-off between cost-effectiveness and enhanced functionality.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
4.2 out of 5
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall offers ease of deployment and competitive pricing, appealing to businesses prioritizing scalability and straightforward setup. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides advanced threat prevention and customization, ideal for enterprises with complex security needs, despite higher costs.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Report
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall involves minimal setup costs, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF requires a substantial initial investment. Despite this, CloudGuard offers robust customization benefits that Cloudflare may not provide.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare Web Application Firewall involves minimal setup costs, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF requires a substantial initial investment. Despite this, CloudGuard offers robust customization benefits that Cloudflare may not provide.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Radware Alteon
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Radware Alteon
4.3 out of 5
Radware Alteon excels in load balancing and security integration, offering a cost-effective solution with flexible deployment options for hybrid environments. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF focuses on advanced threat detection and API management, enhancing application security in cloud-compatible settings.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Radware Alteon Report
Radware Alteon offers lower initial setup costs, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF has a higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Alteon offers lower initial setup costs, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF has a higher setup expense.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
4.1 out of 5
Barracuda Web Application Firewall appeals with its ease of use and affordability, ideal for those seeking straightforward deployment and quick ROI. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF's advanced features and customization options attract organizations needing comprehensive, flexible security solutions.
Download Barracuda Web Application Firewall vs. Check Point CloudGuard WAF Report
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is noted for its straightforward setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF may involve higher initial expenses. Barracuda tends to be more cost-effective initially, in contrast to the potentially more significant upfront costs with CloudGuard.
View comparison
Pricing
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is noted for its straightforward setup cost, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF may involve higher initial expenses. Barracuda tends to be more cost-effective initially, in contrast to the potentially more significant upfront costs with CloudGuard.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
Radware Cloud WAF Service
4.4 out of 5
Radware Cloud WAF Service excels with user-friendly analytics and easy integration, ideal for finance sectors needing competitive pricing. In comparison, Check Point CloudGuard WAF, recognized for AI-driven security and comprehensive threat prevention, appeals to those prioritizing advanced security capabilities over cost.
Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Radware Cloud WAF Service Report
Radware Cloud WAF Service has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point CloudGuard WAF, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Radware Cloud WAF Service has a higher setup cost compared to Check Point CloudGuard WAF, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
open-appsec
1 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard WAF Logo
open-appsec
1 out of 5
Open-appsec offers robust security management capabilities with seamless integration into existing systems, providing features that emphasize adaptability and control. Users appreciate its extensive threat detection but suggest enhancements in documentation clarity and response time optimization to align better with diverse user preferences.
View comparison

Related categories

Application Security Tools
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)