

The Imperva Application Security Platform and Check Point CloudGuard WAF both compete in web threat protection, offering advanced features for securing applications. Imperva seems to have an upper hand in user-friendly interface and real-time traffic analysis, while Check Point emphasizes AI-driven threat prevention.
Features: Imperva Application Security Platform includes robust web threat protection features such as DDoS defense, virtual patching, and SQL injection prevention. It offers advanced analytics for bot attack recognition and provides real-time traffic analysis. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is known for strong AI-driven threat prevention, focusing on OWASP Top 10 and zero-day attacks, with features like machine learning for threat detection and automated policy upgrades.
Room For Improvement: Users wish Imperva would enhance its GUI, reporting capabilities, and support processes, along with providing more transparency during outages. Check Point CloudGuard WAF users recommend improvements in initial setup simplicity, more intuitive management for custom rules, and enhanced language support in customer service.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva Application Security Platform supports public, private, and hybrid cloud deployments but has mixed customer service feedback due to response delays. Check Point CloudGuard WAF allows similar deployment flexibility, showing strengths in public cloud environments, although initial setup complexity and language support are noted concerns.
Pricing and ROI: Imperva's pricing is competitive within its feature class, but cost considerations affect subscription decisions despite security benefits. ROI is seen through compliance and security assurance, though measuring it precisely is challenging. Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers competitive pricing, appreciated for its threat prevention value. Although pricing models can be complex, ROI is acknowledged through enhanced security efficiency.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
They know how much money they are losing while the system is down, so by increasing the possibility of not having a down website or web application, return on investment can be calculated easily.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
I would rate the technical support of Imperva DDoS as ten.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
99% of customers are using the cloud version of Imperva DDoS protection, so they just purchase the new license and scale as needed.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
The stability of Imperva DDoS is very good, as it seems they have a lot of servers around the world.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
Maybe Imperva DDoS could use endpoints to get information about the attacks before they commence from the endpoint level or establish cooperation with endpoint vendors to share this information.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
I have utilized Imperva's Intelligent Traffic Filtering feature. This feature helps me understand how the attack is progressing and what is happening inside the requests to our website.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Imperva Application Security Platform | 7.6% |
| Check Point CloudGuard WAF | 2.2% |
| Other | 90.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 83 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 61 |
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.
What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.
Imperva Application Security Platform delivers comprehensive and continuous web threat protection. Renowned for its ease of use, it shields web applications and databases from various cyber threats while integrating seamlessly with cloud and on-premises environments.
Imperva Application Security Platform protects web environments by offering advanced security measures against threats like DDoS attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting. As a robust web application firewall, it provides extensive monitoring and bot management capabilities. The platform integrates content delivery networks for enhanced performance and scalability, while real-time traffic analysis ensures consistent protection. Despite its strengths, improvements can be made in policy management and customization options. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and more competitive pricing models. The inclusion of AI for enhanced analytics is also anticipated.
What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries needing strong database and application protection. Companies use it to enforce geolocation restrictions and manage bots, benefiting sectors like finance and e-commerce where data security and threat monitoring are critical. Its ability to protect and ensure data accessibility makes it integral to business operations prioritizing cyber resilience.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.