

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Check Point CloudGuard WAF are competitors in web application protection. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has an advantage in pricing, offering better value for certain users through its Azure service integration.
Features: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway integrates well within the Azure ecosystem providing features such as SSL offloading, URL-based routing, and protection against common web vulnerabilities. Check Point CloudGuard WAF emphasizes advanced threat intelligence, automatic scaling, and in-depth threat detection capabilities to counter sophisticated attack vectors. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is recognized for offering more advanced built-in threat protection tools aimed at organizations that need comprehensive security.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could enhance its advanced threat protection capabilities to match the sophistication seen in other solutions. Its routing and security customization features would benefit from more flexibility outside the Azure environment. Additionally, the integration with non-Azure services could be improved for broader applicability. Check Point CloudGuard WAF could work on reducing the high initial setup cost, potentially making it more accessible for smaller enterprises. Its integration with other cloud platforms might need simplification to enhance ease of use. Additionally, optimizing its resource utilization efficiency could lead to better performance under high load conditions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides a streamlined deployment process within Azure environments with extensive support documentation, facilitating rapid implementation. Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers flexibility across various cloud platforms backed by dedicated customer service, allowing for more tailored deployments in non-Azure environments.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is generally more cost-effective with its scalable pay-as-you-go model, appealing to businesses heavily using Azure services which leads to a higher ROI. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, though potentially incurring higher initial costs, justifies this through its enhanced security offerings, catering to enterprises prioritizing comprehensive threat protection.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway significantly impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance.
If we can use a shared resource, then the return on investment is really nice.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
I would say they provide the best support for Application Gateway because they own the product, so their support is top-notch.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
I would rate Microsoft support as good because they have a very skilled technical support team in the background
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a very scalable product.
It has the autoscaling feature, so there is not much concern around performance; it can scale significantly.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a scalable solution.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
We have been using it for the past two to three years, and there have been good results with no problems so far.
The stability is good, and except for a few instances, I don't see the non-availability of Azure Cloud services.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
One feature I mentioned is the support for non-HTTPS protocols such as TCP, which could allow one endpoint for all kinds of protocols.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
In future releases of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would like to see more AI functionalities and a better dashboard as well as some customizations.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
We would prefer to have it cheaper, but it is still expensive.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
When it comes to pricing for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats.
The gateway's Web Application Firewall feature enhances security as it is the first entry point to your network from the outside world.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 6.0% |
| Check Point CloudGuard WAF | 2.2% |
| Other | 91.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.
What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.