

Imperva Application Security Platform and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway compete in the field of application security. Imperva seems to have the upper hand in customizable security needs, while Azure Application Gateway is favored for ease of use and traffic management.
Features: Imperva excels in correlated attack validation, tailored profiling policies, and offers a high return on investment for sectors facing regular security threats. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is appreciated for its simple configuration, efficient traffic management, and real-time analytics.
Room for Improvement: Users of Imperva suggest enhancing user-friendliness, analytics capabilities, and customer support response times. For Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, improvements are needed in scalability, integration with existing systems, and support for more protocols.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva is flexible across hybrid and public clouds but noted for complex deployment in on-premises setups, with generally responsive customer service. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is praised for integration with Microsoft services yet criticized for confusing documentation and support inconsistencies.
Pricing and ROI: Imperva's pricing reflects robust security features, offering high ROI in threat-prone sectors but can be seen as cost-prohibitive. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is competitively priced for Azure users with a pay-as-you-go model, though costs can accumulate based on usage intensity.
They know how much money they are losing while the system is down, so by increasing the possibility of not having a down website or web application, return on investment can be calculated easily.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway significantly impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance.
If we can use a shared resource, then the return on investment is really nice.
We have seen a return on investment in terms of time-saving and cost-saving by not creating our own infrastructure.
I would rate the technical support of Imperva DDoS as ten.
I would say they provide the best support for Application Gateway because they own the product, so their support is top-notch.
There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact.
I would rate Microsoft support as good because they have a very skilled technical support team in the background
99% of customers are using the cloud version of Imperva DDoS protection, so they just purchase the new license and scale as needed.
It has the autoscaling feature, so there is not much concern around performance; it can scale significantly.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a very scalable product.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is a scalable solution.
The stability of Imperva DDoS is very good, as it seems they have a lot of servers around the world.
We have been using it for the past two to three years, and there have been good results with no problems so far.
The stability is good, and except for a few instances, I don't see the non-availability of Azure Cloud services.
Maybe Imperva DDoS could use endpoints to get information about the attacks before they commence from the endpoint level or establish cooperation with endpoint vendors to share this information.
One feature I mentioned is the support for non-HTTPS protocols such as TCP, which could allow one endpoint for all kinds of protocols.
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has room for improvement because it offers many features, but its configuration is a bit difficult, at least from the developer point of view.
There is room for improvement in terms of support, such as assigning agents directly for more straightforward engagement.
I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive.
We would prefer to have it cheaper, but it is still expensive.
Azure solutions are quite expensive.
When it comes to pricing for Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it a seven out of ten.
I have utilized Imperva's Intelligent Traffic Filtering feature. This feature helps me understand how the attack is progressing and what is happening inside the requests to our website.
We are using it for some of the security features for our applications, particularly for securing traffic in transit with SSL.
The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats.
We find mutual TLS valuable because we can verify the client securely by setting up the trust certificate of the client, and also if we do it at the client side as well.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Imperva Application Security Platform | 7.6% |
| Microsoft Azure Application Gateway | 6.0% |
| Other | 86.4% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 83 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 61 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
Imperva Application Security Platform delivers comprehensive and continuous web threat protection. Renowned for its ease of use, it shields web applications and databases from various cyber threats while integrating seamlessly with cloud and on-premises environments.
Imperva Application Security Platform protects web environments by offering advanced security measures against threats like DDoS attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting. As a robust web application firewall, it provides extensive monitoring and bot management capabilities. The platform integrates content delivery networks for enhanced performance and scalability, while real-time traffic analysis ensures consistent protection. Despite its strengths, improvements can be made in policy management and customization options. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and more competitive pricing models. The inclusion of AI for enhanced analytics is also anticipated.
What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries needing strong database and application protection. Companies use it to enforce geolocation restrictions and manage bots, benefiting sectors like finance and e-commerce where data security and threat monitoring are critical. Its ability to protect and ensure data accessibility makes it integral to business operations prioritizing cyber resilience.
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.
To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.