Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Broadcom are both solutions in the Endpoint Encryption category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7, while Broadcom is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 5.1% mindshare in EE, compared to Broadcom’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Read 15 Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade reviews

1,469 Views
1,219 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Read 39 Symantec Endpoint Encryption reviews

2,514 Views
2,338 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade are both leading solutions in the encryption software category. Symantec is favored for its pricing and support, whereas Check Point is recognized for its advanced features.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Encryption is appreciated for its reliable encryption, scalability, and seamless background operation which benefits enterprise deployments. Check Point focuses on centralized management and pre-boot authentication, ensuring full disk protection, especially valuable in case of device loss.

Room for Improvement: Symantec may enhance integration capabilities and accelerate support response times. Users often report device slowdowns and complexities during feature management. Check Point could improve decryption times and support responsiveness. Its interface and customization options need more flexibility, particularly for complex setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec primarily supports on-premises setups, with reports of varied customer service experiences, especially after the Broadcom acquisition. Check Point provides support for both on-premises and cloud environments and is seen as having a smoother initial setup process, with some international responsiveness issues.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec offers competitive pricing for large enterprises, although appearing costly against certain alternatives. Check Point's pricing is seen as high with various charges. Both solutions contribute to workforce productivity and secure data protection, leading to substantial ROI for enterprises focusing on security.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

7th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Data Protection (4th)

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Ranking in Endpoint Encryption

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Endpoint Encryption category, the mindshare of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is 5.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is 7.7%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Encryption Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Symantec Endpoint Encryption	7.7%
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade	5.1%
Other	87.2%

Endpoint Encryption

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov

Project manager at SII

Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use

I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.

Read full review

Jagadeesh B

Solutions Architect at IBM

Security monitoring has improved and protects mission-level mac segments for critical users

Currently, I am not using this because it is mandated on Office 365, which we are not currently maintaining. We are just using the manage feature, so it is not something we control. We are using Cisco SecureClient for VPN. Symantec Endpoint Encryption is only used at the MAC level segment for the B Mission levels for security purposes, and it is only from the ten user perspective. It is straightforward and not complex. I would rate the complexity as a seven, but I would rate the product itself as a nine. We have approximately fifty thousand in budget. Better security methods are valuable features that we can suggest, as everything is under liability. My overall review rating for this solution is nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is pretty reliable."

"We use the solution for endpoint encryption and it handles everything, with security, a firewall within the workstation, and DLP within the solution and on the workstation, making use of 360-degree security on one's workstation."

"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."

"Above all, the possibility of keeping our data safe by placing a unique digital signature for each device we will encrypt, informing us of any unauthorized changes, is one of the most valuable features."

"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."

"This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."

"Its central management console has really made an impact on our organization."

"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade pros

"The stability of the product is very good; there are no bugs or glitches, it does not crash or freeze, and it is reliable."

"Its management is good, and it is also scalable and mostly stable."

"Overall Symantec Endpoint Encryption is a reasonable solution."

"The solution was stable and did not crash."

"It attempts to detect CVS quickly and recognizes it to fix it or alert us so we have to update patches if required."

"We have been very satisfied with the solution's security capabilities."

"The best feature of Symantec Endpoint Encryption is the encryption itself, and none of our customers have complained about this solution at all, so I take it that everything is still working fine."

"One notable aspect is the ability to customize alerts and other settings."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pros

Cons

"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."

"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."

"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."

"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."

"You do need to be careful that you don't mess too much with the endpoint, or you might have issues with the work stations."

"The solution is overpriced."

"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."

"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade cons

"The security could be improved."

"I do not recommend Symantec Endpoint Encryption. The support needs to be improved."

"It's a bit difficult to get good support. Their response times are really bad."

"We'd like to switch from Symantec due to the fact that the switching part is a pain."

"One feature that is lacking is integration with Symantec Information Centric (ICT). As it is now, I don't see how to integrate the encryption with ICT, and in my opinion this is an area that certainly requires encryption, even though it's no longer supported by Broadcom."

"We would like some advanced security protection features."

"Upgrades from one version to another may only sometimes be straightforward, especially if one needs a clearer understanding of the process."

"The agent can be improved on the solution. Right now, we have an Endpoint Protection agent as well as an encryption agent and another for the DLVs and other services. We would prefer a single agent for the entire product."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."

"The licensing costs yearly are $5000."

"The cost of this solution is a little on the higher side."

"The solution is good, but it is more expensive than other solutions in the market. Other solutions, such as BitLocker are less expensive."

"Depending on how many modules you will use (up to five) the licensing will be more expensive."

"Symantec Endpoint Encryption is not expensive."

"Although the performance and stability of this solution are good, our challenge is the price tag. You buy the solution once, but you also have to keep on buying the licenses yearly."

"We hold an annual license, and their pricing is competitive, falling into the affordable range."

"There is a license required for this solution."

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Encryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

University

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Microsoft BitLocker compare with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Microsoft BitLocker is very intuitive and easy to maintain. It is basically the global standard solution for drive encryption and it successfully fulfills regulatory needs in terms of data protecti...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

I am not sure about the pricing and licensing cost of Symantec Endpoint Encryption.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

I am not owning that part and cannot comment on it. Our security team handles that aspect. I have not used it enough to provide detailed feedback.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 19% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 14% of the time

Sophos SafeGuard vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 13% of the time

WinMagic SecureDoc vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 12% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 7% of the time

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Competitors

Microsoft BitLocker vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 21% of the time

Sophos SafeGuard vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 11% of the time

WinMagic SecureDoc vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 9% of the time

ESET Endpoint Encryption vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 9% of the time

McAfee MVISION Mobile vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Compared 2% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Encryption Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

August 2026

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade report

Download Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Endpoint Encryption

July 2026

Download Symantec Endpoint Encryption product report

Also Known As

No data available

Symantec Drive Encryption

Overview

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade provides robust encryption and centralized management, enhancing data protection with pre-boot authentication and cross-platform compatibility.

Ideal for organizations that prioritize data security, Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade offers seamless updates and efficient management. It enhances user satisfaction with features like silent encryption and secure data sharing. By preventing unauthorized access and offering reliable support, it secures sensitive information across devices. However, areas for improvement include encryption speed and resource consumption, while data recovery could be streamlined. The tool is useful in remote work scenarios, integrating effectively with other Check Point tools, and supports compliance and business continuity.

What are the essential features of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

Robust Encryption: Ensures data security across hard drives and removable media.
Centralized Management: Simplifies control through a unified platform.
Pre-Boot Authentication: Enhances security before OS startup.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across different operating systems.
Silent Encryption: Operates discreetly without interrupting workflow.
Secure Data Sharing: Facilitates secure exchange of sensitive information.

What benefits should be considered during evaluation?

Improved Data Protection: Safeguards against breaches and unauthorized access.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting regulatory requirements.
Business Continuity: Maintains operations in event of device loss or theft.
Management Efficiency: Streamlines IT administrative tasks.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is implemented to protect sensitive client data while ensuring compliance with standards. Its multi-factor authentication feature is crucial in financial sectors for securing transactions. In healthcare, it ensures patient data privacy, facilitating secure remote work and communication.

Check Point Software Technologies

Symantec Endpoint Encryption provides centralized management and robust encryption, making it a valued security tool for protecting critical data across multiple devices and platforms in industries like finance and government.

Symantec Endpoint Encryption offers seamless integration and scalable security capabilities. Users value its centralized management, strong dashboard, and email protection. Known for ease of use, it supports disk and file encryption, policy assignment, and synchronization of enterprise databases with minimal technical support. Users note challenges in remote deployment and complex manual installations, seeking more intuitive interfaces and better technical support. Performance impact, pricing, and integration with Symantec offerings are areas of concern.

What are the top features of Symantec Endpoint Encryption?

Centralized Management: Simplifies the control of encryption across all devices.
Robust Encryption: Protects data using advanced encryption standards.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with other software environments.
Remote Management: Allows for the management of devices from a distance.
Email Protection: Secures email communications.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Data Security: Ensures protection against data breaches and unauthorized access.
Compliance Adherence: Helps meet regulatory requirements, particularly in strict industries.
Ease of Use: Reduces the need for technical support and lowers training costs.

Symantec Endpoint Encryption is widely used in finance and government sectors, offering encryption solutions for emails, mobile devices, and critical documents. It addresses endpoint security and compliance, deploying both on-cloud and on-premises to safeguard drives, accounts, and data, crucial for clients with strict compliance policies.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)

Citrix Systems Inc., City of Lansing, Commercial & Industrial Property, France T_l_visions, Fujian Mobile Co. Ltd., Group Lotus plc, Hall Booth Smith & Slover, P.C. (HBSS), Portugal Telecom, PostFinance, Public Pension Agency

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

June 2026

Free Report: Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. Symantec Endpoint Encryption report.

See our list of best Endpoint Encryption vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.