Check Point Infinity vs Google Security Operations comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Google are both solutions in the AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Google is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.5. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 1.7% mindshare in AICP, compared to Google’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Google users who would recommend it.

Check Point Infinity

Read 41 Check Point Infinity reviews

1,534 Views
291 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Google Security Operations

Read 4 Google Security Operations reviews

1,945 Views
486 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Check Point Infinity

Google Security Operations

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

Check Point Infinity and Google Security Operations are two competing products in the cybersecurity solutions category. Google Security Operations appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and proactive threat detection capabilities, despite a higher cost.

Features: Check Point Infinity provides unified security management, effective threat prevention, and integration across network, endpoint, and cloud services. Google Security Operations is designed for advanced threat intelligence, real-time detection, and automated response, optimized for scalable cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point Infinity offers a straightforward setup process with robust customer support, addressing technical queries efficiently. Google Security Operations facilitates quick cloud-native deployment but offers less personalized support options.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point Infinity requires an initial investment but yields long-term ROI due to its integration and security effectiveness. Google Security Operations may have a higher upfront cost but provides ROI through reduced manual monitoring due to advanced threat intelligence.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Infinity vs. Google Security Operations Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Infinity vs. Google Security Operations

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Infinity

Ranking in AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (9th), AI Security (4th), AI Observability (11th)

Google Security Operations

Ranking in AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms

11th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (23rd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms category, the mindshare of Check Point Infinity is 1.7%. The mindshare of Google Security Operations is 4.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point Infinity	1.7%
Google Security Operations	4.5%
Other	93.8%

AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms

Featured Reviews

Chetan Bhati

Network Security Engineer at Arrow PC Network Pvt Ltd

Improves daily threat prevention with real-time detection and requires better alert tuning for faster prioritization

Check Point Infinity is powerful, but there are a few areas that could improve. The learning curve for new users can be steep, especially when managing multiple modules like CloudGuard, Quantum, and Harmony together. Some alerts can be overwhelming, making it harder to prioritize without fine-tuning. While automation helps, occasional manual adjustments are still needed. Overall, it is strong, but simplifying onboarding and alert management would make it even better. Integration with third-party tools could be smoother. The reporting dashboard could be more customizable for quick insights. Performance on very large networks can sometimes slow during updates. Overall, while the platform is strong, improving user experience, alert management, and integration would make it even more efficient for daily operations.

Read full review

reviewer2203269

Cloud Senior lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Real-time threat detection and alarm management have improved security operations

Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting. It provides a detailed pipeline for detection and is beneficial for real-time threat monitoring when integrated with Mandiant. The tool's integration capabilities are effective, and it helps in managing alarms for normal threats efficiently. Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Check Point Infinity has impacted my organization positively, as I have seen a reduction in security incidents and response times, with threats that used to slip through different point solutions now being blocked automatically thanks to the unified prevention layers."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from factors like ease of use, visibility, and cost to the enterprise."

"Since implementing Check Point Infinity, we have noticed a clear improvement in our overall security posture and efficiency because the unified threat prevention reduced the need for multiple point security and simplified daily operation through centralized management."

"It is one of the best brands and products in terms of centralization."

"The Infinity portal combines all Check Point solutions in one place, including the endpoint, SASE, and the SMP."

"Check Point Infinity has positively impacted my organization by streamlining security prevention and strengthening our overall posture."

"For me, one of the best features of Check Point Infinity is to be able to have the possibility of emulating the activity of attached files with malicious content in such a short time."

"Our company used Check Point Infinity to connect various locations worldwide through VPN, specifically using IPsec, rather than for cybersecurity. We implemented it in on-premises networks to collect data in data centers from different locations."

More Check Point Infinity pros

"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."

"Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting."

"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."

"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."

"Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations."

Cons

"In the future, I would like to see new developments that allow us to centralize the cloud."

"Check Point Infinity price could improve."

"The cost of maintaining and purchasing the security components is high."

"The updates could be less frequent."

"They need to update the guides."

"Something that should be better in Check Point Infinity is the customization, though I don't have any specific suggestions at this time."

"The improvements needed for Check Point Infinity include that the documentation is not intuitive, and we needed more pictures or steps to make it more intuitive for all people when deploying it for the first time."

"One area for improvement in Check Point Infinity is the user interface, as it can feel complex for new users."

More Check Point Infinity cons

"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."

"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."

"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."

"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."

"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The solution's price is quite high, and the licensing model requires extra licenses for various features like SD-WAN."

"The flexibility in pricing is advantageous, and being a special partner allows for negotiating special rates based on the project requirements."

"The product has good pricing considering the features and a global approach."

"Check Point should provide an enterprise-wide license where the organization should be provided free hand of using any license or services for an agreed period of time (EULA)."

"The pricing of Check Point Infinity could be better. There is a license needed to use the solution and we pay annually."

"When it comes to price, the paramount consideration is the strength of the security. If the security measures provided by the product, such as Check Point Infinity, are robust and meet our requirements, price becomes a secondary concern."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Security Firm

21%

Educational Organization

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	40
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Infinity?

Check Point Infinity's threat prevention capabilities benefitted our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point Infinity?

Check Point Infinity could be improved with more intuitive documentation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point Infinity?

Check Point Infinity is used primarily for consolidating security across networks, including cloud and on-premise, and endpoints under one architecture. It is relied upon most for unified threat pr...

See all answers

What do you like most about Siemplify?

The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Siemplify?

The pricing for Google SecOps and Microsoft Sentinel is almost the same, with no significant differences.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Siemplify?

The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions. Google SecOps reports could be more detailed, similar to the comprehensive descriptions provided by Microso...

See all answers

Comparisons

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 14% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 14% of the time

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 7% of the time

IRONSCALES vs Check Point Infinity

Compared 4% of the time

More Check Point Infinity Competitors

Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations

Compared 11% of the time

Panther vs Google Security Operations

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Google Security Operations

Compared 8% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations

Compared 6% of the time

More Google Security Operations Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Infinity

January 2026

Download Check Point Infinity product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

December 2025

Download Google Security Operations product report

Also Known As

R80, Infinity

Siemplify ThreatNexus

Overview

Check Point Infinity is the only fully consolidated cyber security architecture that provides unprecedented protection against Gen V mega-cyber attacks as well as future cyber threats across all networks, endpoint, cloud and mobile. The architecture is designed to resolve the complexities of growing connectivity and inefficient security. Learn more about Check Point Infinity

Check Point Software Technologies

Google Security Operations offers a robust playbook builder and integration capabilities designed to streamline workflows and integrate seamlessly with existing systems for enhanced security management.

Google Security Operations stands out in threat detection, monitoring, and alarm management, especially when used alongside Mandiant. Its intuitive interface supports compliance requirements, and it provides customizable workflows through playbooks. Integration with multiple tools allows for automation and increased flexibility, though improvements in API connection determination and playbook search capabilities could enhance user experience. Effective in orchestrating alerts and managing security events, it is extensively used for automated response, efficient alert triage, investigation, reporting, and ticketing management, supporting over 20 use cases including real-time threat detection.

What are the Key Features of Google Security Operations?

Playbook Builder: Allows for creating customizable workflows tailored to specific scenarios.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates connectivity with numerous tools for automation.
Threat Detection: Improves monitoring and response when combined with Mandiant's capabilities.
Simplicity in Feature Adoption: Easy incorporation of new features and workflows.

What Benefits Should You Look for in Reviews?

Workflow Efficiency: Automates triage and investigation processes for quicker security management.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Enhances monitoring effectiveness in Managed Extended Detection and Response strategies.
Flexibility: Adaptable integrations support dynamic security needs.
Compliance Support: Aids in maintaining regulatory standards with straightforward reporting features.

In industries where real-time threat response is critical, such as finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is favored for its automation and integration capabilities. These characteristics are vital for efficiently managing complex security landscapes and maintaining compliance across sectors.

Google

Sample Customers

Edel AG

FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Infinity vs. Google Security Operations

December 2025

Free Report: Check Point Infinity vs. Google Security Operations

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Infinity vs. Google Security Operations and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Infinity vs. Google Security Operations report.

See our list of best AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms vendors.

We monitor all AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.