Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Google and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Google is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Google holds a 1.6% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 7.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Google Security Operations

Read 4 Google Security Operations reviews

728 Views
482 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Splunk SOAR

Read 44 Splunk SOAR reviews

4,577 Views
2,761 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Google Security Operations

Splunk SOAR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Google Security Operations and Splunk SOAR are products in the security operations field. Google Security Operations holds an edge due to its integrated cloud-native approach, while Splunk SOAR is noted for its strong automation capabilities.

Features: Google Security Operations offers data integration and analysis leveraging Google Cloud's infrastructure, strong threat detection and hunting capabilities, and seamless integration within Google's ecosystem. Splunk SOAR excels in automation thanks to customizable playbooks, versatile third-party integrations, and a mature orchestration module.

Room for Improvement: Google Security Operations could enhance its flexibility to match a wider range of environments, improve third-party integration support, and expand its automation features. Splunk SOAR could refine its user interface for easy adaptability, streamline documentation for less common integrations, and reduce setup complexity for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Security Operations provides streamlined deployment through Google Cloud and offers specialized support leveraging Google's infrastructure. Splunk SOAR requires more setup but offers customizable deployment with thorough documentation and robust community support, providing flexibility in different IT environments.

Pricing and ROI: Google Security Operations typically involves costs related to cloud services with predictable ROI through integrated solutions, enhanced by its seamless cloud integration. Splunk SOAR may involve higher upfront costs due to customization and powerful automation, promising strong ROI via improved operational efficiency and flexibility at a premium.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Security Operations

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (32nd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (10th)

Splunk SOAR

Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Google Security Operations is 1.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.2%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2203269

Cloud Senior lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Real-time threat detection and alarm management have improved security operations

Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting. It provides a detailed pipeline for detection and is beneficial for real-time threat monitoring when integrated with Mandiant. The tool's integration capabilities are effective, and it helps in managing alarms for normal threats efficiently. Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations.

Read full review

Shubham Sinha.

Senior Principal Information Security Analyst at Veritas Technologies LLC

Helped eliminate repetitive and redundant tasks, but custom functions and reporting need a lot of work

The visibility of the solution’s playbook viewer depends on the right you assign to the analyst. SOAR has the flexibility to distinguish between the roles of analyst and owner. If the analyst's role is to just work on a ticket, they cannot view the playbook design platform. That is limited to the owner. That can be both a good and bad thing. A major problem I have faced in SOAR's rights distribution is roles and responsibilities. Suppose I am initially granted user rights or analyst rights, but later on, I also get admin rights. SOAR is unable to amend the limitations of my role. I raised a support ticket with Splunk about this. They said it's a bug in their 5.3.5 version. To fix this, I had to reinstall the entire platform from scratch, just to amend the rights and responsibilities of one role. This bug was not fixed. Also, the latest GUI is terrible. The previous one was better. Another point is that while using Splunk SOAR in an investigation is not difficult, there are some complex parameters. We have SOAR case management, but the licensing is going to put a big hole in your pocket. Also, there is an issue with investigation node addition. When you are doing node additions you cannot grant the entire environment to have SOAR visibility into the incident. So when you integrate it with an ITSM tool, like ServiceNow or Jira for ticketing purposes, there is a challenge. When you do nodes for investigation on a regular basis, sometimes it does not update our ServiceNow platform, which is terrible. It is a redundant activity for an analyst to update that in the case management as well as in the ITSM tool. Although SOAR provides integration, the functionality of investigation and nodes is terrible when it comes to integration. An additional area for improvement is custom function creation. It's terrible. A newbie cannot create custom functions right away. They would require a solid understanding first. Also, the reporting is really awful. If I want to do a report for a customized time period, such as the last three days or the last four days, or from the 10th to the 12th of June, that is not available in SOAR at all. That kind of feature is available in Cortex XSOAR. Reporting is a real challenge.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, Google SecOps is a very useful service for security operations."

"Without hyperbole, I have never, in my entire career, encountered a vendor or a vendor community as awesome as Siemplify. Siemplify and the Siemplify Community quite literally made it possible for our SOC to increase almost five-fold in our number of clients and number of analysts and to go from a Monday to Friday 9-5 shop to a 24/7 shop all in the span of under a year and a half and all while continually adding capabilities and improving the services we offer to our clients."

"The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user interface is generally straightforward, although recent changes may require some adjustment and Siemplify's integrations and capabilities offer potential support for various compliance requirements."

"The most valuable feature of Siemplify is the playbooks that can be created."

"Google SecOps is extremely useful for threat detection and hunting."

"The product provides 100% automation for certain processes."

"Splunk SOAR's extensive library of pre-built integrations allows it to connect with a vast array of popular security and IT applications, streamlining workflows across our existing security stack."

"The automation part of the product is great."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The customization of the playbook in Splunk SOAR is very beneficial."

"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR that stands out is it has a great SOAR. The automation and orchestration module is highly mature. A lot of use cases are on user entity and behavioral analytics (UEBA), which is artificial intelligence and machine learning-based (AIML)."

"The customizable playbook is the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"When you design a playbook, you can integrate multiple log sources and define rules... After that, the platform automatically compiles all these activities and, based on the results, the analyst only has to indicate whether the result is a true or false positive. That reduces the time and effort involved."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"We often encounter minor issues that could be improved, but we maintain communication with the developers and submit feature requests. Recently, I requested enhancements such as improved search functionality within playbooks and expanded options for exporting case data."

"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."

"Building the playbooks could be easier and the integration could improve. It is a difficult process, such as what API connections need to be made."

"The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions."

"I'm inclined to say that I'd love to see some Machine Learning capabilities integrated into the platform, however, I just attended a demo this morning where Siemplify gave a sneak peek into some Machine Learning capabilities that they are currently developing and have roadmapped for release soon."

"Creating playbooks using the solution’s playbook editor, for me, is very cumbersome. There have been instances where I have said to myself that I just don't want to use this editor. I might just use a code block and write my own code within it... The functionality in the playbook editor is 80 percent there, but that 20 percent is still lacking. They could make it more efficient."

"We've run into a few minor issues. Some of the playbook writing is a bit complicated. We've had a few hiccups with the source control. We'd really like to use GitHub deployment keys for a dedicated account. We haven't been able to do that. I think those are some of the major ones."

"The technical support for the Splunk SIEM solution was average."

"The algorithm and machine learning have room for improvement and can be more user-friendly."

"The dashboard could be improved and some other features. SOAR should integrate network capabilities, allowing us to also monitor the WLAN network. Splunk is also expensive and difficult for beginners to learn. It's hard for a new user to figure out how to visualize old threat data. It took two to three months to learn with hands-on experience how to use the dashboard, visualize events, and analyze threats."

"The cost of Splunk SOAR has room for improvement."

"It would be ideal for us if Splunk SOAR could integrate with Teams."

"While there have been improvements to the investigation process, particularly with the playbook data, the current log review method is cumbersome."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."

"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Retailer

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Siemplify?

The playbooks feature in Siemplify is crucial for automation. We've utilized both standard and custom integrations with other security operation solutions, enhancing our flexibility. The user inter...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Siemplify?

The pricing for Google SecOps and Microsoft Sentinel is almost the same, with no significant differences.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Siemplify?

The main improvement could be in the accuracy and detail provided in threat descriptions. Google SecOps reports could be more detailed, similar to the comprehensive descriptions provided by Microso...

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR is affordable cost-wise only, but not competitive from a technical perspective compared to Palo Alto SOAR and FortiSOAR.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

The creation of playbooks is complex in Splunk SOAR ( /categories/security-orchestration-automation-and-response-soar ), and the number of integrations needs enhancement. Although it enhances alert...

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Google Security Operations

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Security Operations

Compared 16% of the time

Google Chronicle Suite vs Google Security Operations

Compared 15% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Google Security Operations

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Google Security Operations

Compared 6% of the time

More Google Security Operations Competitors

Cortex XSIAM vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 24% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 19% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 4% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

March 2025

Download Google Security Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

March 2025

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

Siemplify ThreatNexus

Phantom

Overview

Google Security Operations provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities. Tailored for cybersecurity professionals, it integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, offering a proactive approach to managing security challenges.

Designed for enterprises requiring robust threat management, Google Security Operations harnesses the power of Google's infrastructure to deliver comprehensive insights into potential vulnerabilities and attack vectors. Leveraging AI and machine learning, users benefit from enhanced accuracy and speed in identifying threats, making it a crucial tool in maintaining cybersecurity resilience. Its adaptability allows businesses to customize security protocols, ensuring alignment with specific security strategies.

What are the most crucial features of Google Security Operations?

Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify potential threats quickly.
Automated Response: Streamlines response measures to mitigate risks efficiently.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the security demands of an organization.
Integration Capabilities: Easily connects with existing security tools and platforms.

What benefits do users gain from Google Security Operations?

Improved Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces the need for extensive manual monitoring efforts.
Enhanced Decision Making: Provides detailed insights for informed security strategies.
Operational Efficiency: Increases the effectiveness of cybersecurity teams.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Google Security Operations is implemented to address specific regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptive features support cybersecurity frameworks, ensuring data protection and risk management standards are met effectively.

Google

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Sample Customers

FedEx Mondelez Intenrational Check Point Trustwave Atos Cyberint Bae Systems Crowe Longwall Security Telefonica Nordea HCL

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

March 2025

Free Report: Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.