Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk SOAR Logo

Top 10 Splunk SOAR Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

Top Splunk SOAR Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk SOAR based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar, and Elastic Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Splunk SOAR surpasses its competitors by offering advanced security automation, machine learning capabilities, and extensive integration options, empowering organizations to streamline incident response and enhance threat management efficiently, resulting in improved cybersecurity operations and reduced threat response times.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk SOAR Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Microsoft Sentinel
4.1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels in flexibility with third-party integrations, appealing to users prioritizing diverse tool compatibility. In comparison, Microsoft Sentinel benefits from native Microsoft ecosystem integration, appealing to those seeking powerful analytics within a familiar cloud environment, complemented by cost predictability in its pricing model.
Download Microsoft Sentinel vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly setup. Splunk's investment might cater to larger enterprises, contrasting with Sentinel's approach appealing to smaller or budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR requires higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft Sentinel offers a more budget-friendly setup. Splunk's investment might cater to larger enterprises, contrasting with Sentinel's approach appealing to smaller or budget-conscious organizations.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers robust security management and custom parsing, ideal for large enterprises with its event-based pricing. In comparison, Splunk SOAR is suitable for organizations valuing flexible cloud solutions, offering customizable playbooks and strong automation capabilities for evolving needs.
Download IBM Security QRadar vs. Splunk SOAR Report
IBM Security QRadar installation is costlier compared to Splunk SOAR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. IBM's higher setup cost may justify its advanced features and capabilities, while Splunk SOAR attracts cost-conscious users with its economical deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar installation is costlier compared to Splunk SOAR, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. IBM's higher setup cost may justify its advanced features and capabilities, while Splunk SOAR attracts cost-conscious users with its economical deployment.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Security offers scalability, ease of data visualization, and flexibility with its open-source platform. In comparison, Splunk SOAR focuses on automation and integration with mature playbooks. Elastic attracts through cost-effectiveness, while Splunk appeals with comprehensive features despite higher costs.
Download Elastic Security vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Security offers cost-effective setup with straightforward processes, while Splunk SOAR tends to have higher initial costs due to its advanced integration capabilities.
Splunk SOAR Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR is ideal for complex security automation and custom playbooks, offering broad integration options. In comparison, AWS Security Hub excels with AWS-native integrations and a cost-effective pricing model, making it suitable for organizations focused on AWS environments.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR requires a significant initial investment, whereas AWS Security Hub typically offers a more affordable setup cost. The pricing distinctions highlight AWS's cost-effective approach compared to the higher expense associated with Splunk's comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR requires a significant initial investment, whereas AWS Security Hub typically offers a more affordable setup cost. The pricing distinctions highlight AWS's cost-effective approach compared to the higher expense associated with Splunk's comprehensive features.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XSOAR is ideal for large enterprises seeking deep integrations and customizable automation, despite high costs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR's flexible user-based pricing may better serve diverse customer needs with strong integration, though it remains costly.
Download Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has moderate setup costs, while Splunk SOAR incurs a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR has moderate setup costs, while Splunk SOAR incurs a higher initial expense.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Exabeam
3.9 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels with customizable playbooks and extensive integration flexibility, enhancing security operations. In comparison, Exabeam focuses on user behavior analytics and competitive pricing. Splunk SOAR suits those valuing integration, while Exabeam's cost-effectiveness and straightforward platform attract users prioritizing budget-friendly solutions.
Download Exabeam vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Exabeam offers a cost-effective setup, while Splunk SOAR tends to have a higher initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Exabeam offers a cost-effective setup, while Splunk SOAR tends to have a higher initial cost.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Tines
4.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels in complex environments with robust integration and automation capabilities. In comparison, Tines offers an easy-to-use, flexible workflow engine attractive for dynamic settings. Splunk's mature support suits enterprises, while Tines' rapid deployment fits agile organizations seeking quick returns.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Tines Report
Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Tines, which is known for its more affordable initial deployment expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost compared to Tines, which is known for its more affordable initial deployment expense.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.2 out of 5
ThreatConnect TIP attracts budget-conscious buyers with its in-depth threat data management and competitive pricing. In comparison, Splunk SOAR, known for advanced automation and extensive integration, appeals to organizations seeking comprehensive support and long-term ROI benefits from initial investments.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report
ThreatConnect TIP has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, making Splunk SOAR more budget-friendly with its lower initial expenditure.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatConnect TIP has higher setup costs compared to Splunk SOAR, making Splunk SOAR more budget-friendly with its lower initial expenditure.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations
4.0 out of 5
ServiceNow Security Operations appeals to organizations needing deep IT integration, offering automated workflows and comprehensive support. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides customizable security solutions with flexibility, suitable for varied environments and offering significant long-term ROI with a lower initial investment.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report
ServiceNow Security Operations offers a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which provides a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow Security Operations offers a higher setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, which provides a more budget-friendly option.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.2 out of 5
Sumo Logic Security focuses on real-time log monitoring and flexible dashboards, ideal for large enterprises seeking robust cloud solutions. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers advanced automation and playbooks, appealing to organizations needing seamless security orchestration and broad deployment flexibility across environments.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR offers a comprehensive setup, potentially resulting in higher initial expenses. Their pricing reflects differing approaches to security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Sumo Logic Security has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk SOAR offers a comprehensive setup, potentially resulting in higher initial expenses. Their pricing reflects differing approaches to security solutions.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Torq
1 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Torq
1 out of 5
Torq is used for automating workflows in cybersecurity, offering valuable features like integration flexibility and real-time alerts. It allows for simplified process management while room for improvement exists in documentation quality and advanced customization options.
View comparison
Splunk SOAR Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Fortinet FortiSOAR
3.8 out of 5
Fortinet FortiSOAR offers cost-effective pricing and seamless Fortinet ecosystem integration, appealing to budget-conscious environments. In comparison, Splunk SOAR's extensive third-party integrations and robust features may justify higher costs, attracting those needing comprehensive security orchestration across diverse systems.
Download Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Fortinet FortiSOAR has a higher initial setup cost, while Splunk SOAR offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiSOAR has a higher initial setup cost, while Splunk SOAR offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
LogPoint offers effective logging, rapid setup, and AI-driven analytics at cost-effective pricing, appealing to those requiring straightforward deployment and budget predictability. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides superior automation, extensive integrations, and deployment flexibility, suiting businesses needing robust orchestration and integration diversity.
Download Logpoint vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Logpoint offers affordable setup costs enhancing value, whereas Splunk SOAR involves higher initial investment focused on extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint offers affordable setup costs enhancing value, whereas Splunk SOAR involves higher initial investment focused on extensive features.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
Swimlane
3.8 out of 5
Swimlane attracts with simplicity and competitive pricing, fostering faster ROI through lower costs. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers advanced analytics and comprehensive features, justifying its higher price for deeper security insights and scalability, appealing to those valuing extensive capabilities.
Download Splunk SOAR vs. Swimlane Report
Swimlane offers a simpler setup with minimal costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which involves higher setup expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
Swimlane offers a simpler setup with minimal costs compared to Splunk SOAR, which involves higher setup expenditure.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Google Security Operations
4.5 out of 5
Google Security Operations excels in Google service integration, ideal for organizations within this ecosystem. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers vast automation and integration capabilities, appealing to those seeking flexible and comprehensive orchestration, despite potentially higher upfront costs.
Download Google Security Operations vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Google Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk SOAR entails a more complex deployment process and higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in upfront investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Security Operations offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk SOAR entails a more complex deployment process and higher setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in upfront investment between the two solutions.
Splunk SOAR Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
IBM Resilient
3.7 out of 5
IBM Resilient excels in incident response with dynamic playbooks and IBM QRadar integration. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers versatile integration and real-time problem-solving. A tech buyer might prefer IBM Resilient for its incident management or Splunk SOAR for its automation features.
Download IBM Resilient vs. Splunk SOAR Report
IBM Resilient offers straightforward setup costs, while Splunk SOAR requires a more detailed cost analysis, highlighting key differences in initial budgeting.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Resilient offers straightforward setup costs, while Splunk SOAR requires a more detailed cost analysis, highlighting key differences in initial budgeting.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Cyware Cyber Fusion
3.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR excels in automation efficiency, offering seamless integration and playbook execution. In comparison, Cyware Cyber Fusion focuses on collaborative incident response and real-time threat intelligence, appealing to those valuing enhanced team communication and a comprehensive security ecosystem.
Download Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Splunk SOAR requires a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Cyware Cyber Fusion offers a lower entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk SOAR requires a moderate initial setup cost, whereas Cyware Cyber Fusion offers a lower entry point.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
4.0 out of 5
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator excels in cost-effectiveness and intuitive deployment within existing McAfee environments. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers superior automation and integration capabilities with diverse applications. Tech buyers prioritize McAfee for budget efficiency, while Splunk SOAR attracts those valuing advanced orchestration.
Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Splunk SOAR Report
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers a lower setup cost, while Splunk SOAR requires a higher initial investment. The differences strongly highlight McAfee's cost-effectiveness against Splunk's robust approach, impacting budget considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator offers a lower setup cost, while Splunk SOAR requires a higher initial investment. The differences strongly highlight McAfee's cost-effectiveness against Splunk's robust approach, impacting budget considerations.
Splunk SOAR Logo
Splunk SOAR Logo
Rapid7 InsightConnect
4.0 out of 5
InsightConnect excels in simplicity and automation, appealing to those who prioritize ease of use and integration flexibility. In comparison, Splunk SOAR offers enhanced incident response through advanced analytics, making it ideal for those investing in comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.
Download Rapid7 InsightConnect vs. Splunk SOAR Report
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Rapid7 InsightConnect has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk SOAR, highlighting affordability as a key differentiator. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution that may justify its higher initial investment for some organizations.
Splunk SOAR Logo
D3 Security
4.5 out of 5
Splunk SOAR Logo
D3 Security
4.5 out of 5
D3 Security offers cost-effective solutions with strong case management and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Splunk SOAR provides extensive integration and analytics capabilities, justifying its higher price for tech buyers looking for advanced customization and a wide range of third-party integrations.
Download D3 Security vs. Splunk SOAR Report
D3 Security has a more straightforward setup process, while Splunk SOAR may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
D3 Security has a more straightforward setup process, while Splunk SOAR may involve higher initial costs and complexity.

Related categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Microsoft Security Suite