Cyware Cyber Fusion vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Cyware and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Cyware is ranked #22 with an average rating of 5.0, while Splunk is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Cyware holds a 1.5% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Cyware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Splunk SOAR and Cyware Cyber Fusion compete in the cybersecurity automation and orchestration space. Cyware Cyber Fusion seems to have the upper hand due to its rich feature set and overall functionalities.

Features: Splunk SOAR offers integration capabilities, a sophisticated automation engine, and streamlined workflow processes. Cyware Cyber Fusion provides comprehensive threat intelligence capabilities, enhanced situational awareness, and a broad intelligence framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk SOAR includes detailed guidance for its deployment model and proactive support but can have a steeper learning curve. Cyware Cyber Fusion has a straightforward deployment process and accessible customer assistance, making it more accessible for faster implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk SOAR has a higher initial setup cost but delivers long-term ROI with its extensive automation capabilities. Cyware Cyber Fusion balances a lower initial cost with competitive ROI through effective threat management and intelligence integration. While Splunk SOAR might have higher entry costs, Cyware's feature set ensures strong ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Torq is 4.9%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cyware Cyber Fusion is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.8%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk SOAR	7.8%
Torq	4.9%
Cyware Cyber Fusion	1.5%
Other	85.8%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Nimrod Vardi

Global IT Director at OpenWeb

Automation workflows have transformed our IT, enabling secure just-in-time access control

We work with them quite often, so we have a direct line regarding areas in Torq that have room for improvement. If we have a feature request, we can request it. I do not have anything in mind at the moment. We were a design partner for a short while, so we feel that they listen and that users of the system have an impact on the way the system is designed for the better. They have a new community, which is something that I personally suggested years ago. There are many people like me in different places and they might have already built the workflow that I need. Having the option to share workflows or to jump on a thread and say I have this need, did anyone ever build a workflow for it, is amazing. Someone would jump in and say yes, sure, here, take this workflow. I think this is an amazing thing and I really hope that the community will come alive because I think this is really powerful. This is something that I already suggested and it did happen eventually, and I am quite happy with it. I do not have any specific feature in mind that I have a need for at the moment.

Read full review

reviewer2342886

Director of Cyber Security APAC at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

The threat emails are not tailored to our company, though the product is stable

The threat emails are not tailored to our company. It just gives us every newsletter and bombards our email box. The solution must be able to provide threat feeds. We shouldn’t have to rely on third parties and pay for additional licenses. The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow. It is our main ticketing platform.

Read full review

Shiboo Suren

Manager cybersecurity at Hexion Inc.

Automates threat response and reduces investigation time but needs better threat intelligence integration

One thing that we would like to see with Splunk SOAR is the expandability to the threat intelligence feed. Currently, we have limited ingestion to the threat intelligence feed for the correlation purpose. We would like to see it being integrated, with license cost or without license cost, to leading threat intelligence sources such as Recorded Future, Feedly, or Flare. That is something we would appreciate having integrated. The second thing on the improvement side is about exposed credential-related information. If we start ingesting those data to Splunk SOAR or SIEM with some sort of integration with threat intelligence feed, that will also improve our detection and prediction method or help us with the investigation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using that one piece of AI, we auto-closed 511 cases in quarter four alone."

"What I appreciate most about Torq is that it is an essential part of our system."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"The technical support team is helpful."

"The product is stable."

"It's pretty easy when it comes to setting up assets. If you want to fetch emails or call a REST API, you can set up an asset and grab that information."

"Splunk SOAR helps reduce my mean time to detect significantly and enhances it very well; it reduces the mean time to detect by approximately 70%."

"I like the way Splunk interacts with various systems via the API. The ability to integrate Splunk with our ticketing system has been an immense help because we can maintain our workflow while blending Splunk with our support desk and other ways that we track work."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The most valuable features of Splunk SOAR are the easy integration with other solutions, including other Splunk solutions. The most important playbooks we need on the market come already on the Frontend. However, nowadays, Splunk changed its name, it's not Frontend anymore, it's Splunk Store. This is a very strong point."

"Workflow management is most valuable. It is easily customizable"

"SOAR allows custom code to be written and integrates with various technologies through pre-built apps like Windows Remote Management or custom apps we can build ourselves like a secret retrieval app from our vault."

"The best feature is the integration and the custom Python code that we can write. Splunk SOAR provides us with both of these capabilities, allowing us to integrate different security solutions with Splunk SOAR and take remediation actions directly on those security tools."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes."

"The initial deployment of Torq was not easy."

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"The prices must be reduced."

"The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow."

"The Splunk SOAR platform was not designed specifically for case management which is why this area needs improvement."

"The UI can be more customizable for the clients."

"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."

"We've had trouble implementing the solution with Microsoft products. There seems to be an integration gap."

"We've run into a few minor issues. Some of the playbook writing is a bit complicated. We've had a few hiccups with the source control. We'd really like to use GitHub deployment keys for a dedicated account. We haven't been able to do that. I think those are some of the major ones."

"What we have seen is if the workflow gets halted or if we want to halt a workflow, it cannot be resumed."

"Some of the training materials are on a basic level."

"The creation of playbooks is complex in Splunk SOAR, and the number of integrations needs enhancement. Although it enhances alert handling, it still has a journey to compete with Palo Alto SOAR and FortiSOAR."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."

"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."

"I found the price of Splunk SOAR to be good."

"We renewed it this year. This year was the first time there was a dramatic increase in the price. It was kind of non-negotiable. It was just a high increase. We had internal communications, and it was definitely a surprise to us. In a short time frame, we renewed it this year. Prices are going up everywhere, but they are not always justifiable, at least not to our eyes. The pricing this year was definitely a big shock."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"Splunk SOAR is moderately priced, neither cheap nor overly expensive."

"In my opinion, the price is high, but if you want good products, you have to be willing to pay for them."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

From our research and testing with the tool, we determined there need to be modifications and changes to train the LL...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

I used Torq for conducting one of the proof of evaluations for a vendor we are connected with. I am currently working...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

One of our members uses AWS, and we receive their feed. This involves triaging AWS-related logs. While I do not have ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

The product is stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

The threat emails are not tailored to our company. It just gives us every newsletter and bombards our email box. The ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

We use the solution for the correlation of threat feeds and reporting.

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

I am familiar with the pricing aspect, setup cost, and licensing cost of Splunk SOAR, and it is pretty much similar t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

The visibility of Splunk SOAR's playbook viewer is rather unclear to me; I wonder what the visibility is for. There a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 48% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 10% of the time

Swimlane vs Torq

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Torq

Compared 3% of the time

More Torq Competitors

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 19% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 14% of the time

Anomali vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 13% of the time

Tines vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 6% of the time

More Cyware Cyber Fusion Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 16% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 12% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 5% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

January 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

December 2025

Download Cyware Cyber Fusion product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

January 2026

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

No data available

CSOL, Fusion and Threat Response, Threat Intelligence eXchange, Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR)

Phantom

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

More than just a security automation tool, Cyber Fusion unites threat intel and SOAR to automate any security tool, orchestrate any environment, and collaborate across any boundary, to yield more intelligent threat response.

Cyware

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

December 2025

Free Report: Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.