Cyware Cyber Fusion vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Cyware and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Cyware is ranked #22 with an average rating of 5.0, while Splunk is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Cyware holds a 1.5% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 8.0% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Cyware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Splunk SOAR and Cyware Cyber Fusion compete in the cybersecurity automation and orchestration space. Cyware Cyber Fusion seems to have the upper hand due to its rich feature set and overall functionalities.

Features: Splunk SOAR offers integration capabilities, a sophisticated automation engine, and streamlined workflow processes. Cyware Cyber Fusion provides comprehensive threat intelligence capabilities, enhanced situational awareness, and a broad intelligence framework.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk SOAR includes detailed guidance for its deployment model and proactive support but can have a steeper learning curve. Cyware Cyber Fusion has a straightforward deployment process and accessible customer assistance, making it more accessible for faster implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk SOAR has a higher initial setup cost but delivers long-term ROI with its extensive automation capabilities. Cyware Cyber Fusion balances a lower initial cost with competitive ROI through effective threat management and intelligence integration. While Splunk SOAR might have higher entry costs, Cyware's feature set ensures strong ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Torq is 4.5%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cyware Cyber Fusion is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 8.0%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk SOAR	8.0%
Torq	4.5%
Cyware Cyber Fusion	1.5%
Other	86.0%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

Nimrod Vardi

Global IT Director at OpenWeb

Automation workflows have transformed our IT, enabling secure just-in-time access control

We work with them quite often, so we have a direct line regarding areas in Torq that have room for improvement. If we have a feature request, we can request it. I do not have anything in mind at the moment. We were a design partner for a short while, so we feel that they listen and that users of the system have an impact on the way the system is designed for the better. They have a new community, which is something that I personally suggested years ago. There are many people like me in different places and they might have already built the workflow that I need. Having the option to share workflows or to jump on a thread and say I have this need, did anyone ever build a workflow for it, is amazing. Someone would jump in and say yes, sure, here, take this workflow. I think this is an amazing thing and I really hope that the community will come alive because I think this is really powerful. This is something that I already suggested and it did happen eventually, and I am quite happy with it. I do not have any specific feature in mind that I have a need for at the moment.

Read full review

reviewer2342886

Director of Cyber Security APAC at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

The threat emails are not tailored to our company, though the product is stable

The threat emails are not tailored to our company. It just gives us every newsletter and bombards our email box. The solution must be able to provide threat feeds. We shouldn’t have to rely on third parties and pay for additional licenses. The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow. It is our main ticketing platform.

Read full review

Shiboo Suren

Manager cybersecurity at Hexion Inc.

Automates threat response and reduces investigation time but needs better threat intelligence integration

One thing that we would like to see with Splunk SOAR is the expandability to the threat intelligence feed. Currently, we have limited ingestion to the threat intelligence feed for the correlation purpose. We would like to see it being integrated, with license cost or without license cost, to leading threat intelligence sources such as Recorded Future, Feedly, or Flare. That is something we would appreciate having integrated. The second thing on the improvement side is about exposed credential-related information. If we start ingesting those data to Splunk SOAR or SIEM with some sort of integration with threat intelligence feed, that will also improve our detection and prediction method or help us with the investigation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If I review about 100 vendors that I might work with, Torq is definitely in the top five that gave me personally investment back, just because every bit of effort I put into Torq eventually became a workflow that gave it back to me."

"Using that one piece of AI, we auto-closed 511 cases in quarter four alone."

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"What I appreciate most about Torq is that it is an essential part of our system."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"The product is stable."

"The technical support team is helpful."

"Splunk has many features that make work easier, and it's simple to implement in a large production environment. Splunk collects a massive amount of data from cloud servers and handles it perfectly."

"I like the way Splunk interacts with various systems via the API. The ability to integrate Splunk with our ticketing system has been an immense help because we can maintain our workflow while blending Splunk with our support desk and other ways that we track work."

"The solution allows us to customize playbooks and incorporate custom code, allowing us to drag and drop elements while still writing code to build the integrations we need."

"Scalability is the best feature of the solution."

"Its ability to integrate with other systems and applications in our environment is pretty easy. Sometimes if we see any complexity we try to involve a consultant to help us. Everything is through the built-in app. Splunk can connect to any assets through the built-in app. It could be in a platform, firewalls, or endpoints. It's easy if it's an app integration."

"The most valuable features are the Splunk SOAR apps and playbooks."

"In Splunk SOAR, I find the playbooks valuable. We get to create multiple playbooks, and within each playbook, there is a different type of investigation attached to it, which helps out an analyst or new analysts coming on board."

"We are not a 24/7 SOC, so the most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the auto-response to threats when we are not in the office and the notifications that it sends to the on-call engineer."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes."

"It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet."

"Even now, we have workflows that are in production that use AI steps and I get different results, making it unusable to some degree."

"The initial deployment of Torq was not easy."

"The prices must be reduced."

"The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow."

"SOAR is probably the most unreliable product Splunk has and that's because most of it is content driven from what you put into it. There are certain parts of it that have a little bit of difficulty at volume too. It's always changing. There is new stuff coming out for it that's going to make it a little bit better, but it does have some drawbacks."

"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."

"The number of playbooks on offer should be increased."

"Improving the integration ecosystem can raise the quality of the bottom tier of the integrations so that they can work better out of the box."

"There is a lot of room for improvement with the UI."

"I'm not an expert on Splunk SOAR, but I'm sure our team members know what areas could be improved."

"In my opinion, the focus should be on improving its simplicity, specifically the interface, and configuration."

"While there have been improvements to the investigation process, particularly with the playbook data, the current log review method is cumbersome."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Splunk SOAR is moderately priced, neither cheap nor overly expensive."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."

"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."

"Splunk SOAR is an expensive solution for an organization of our size."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

18%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	33

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

Regarding the downsides of Torq, one issue is that as a SaaS product, I sometimes encounter transparency issues about...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

My role is Cyber Security Engineer, and we use Torq for our case management platform, automating some of our phishing...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

Torq's maintenance requirements depend on how you define maintenance. While Torq handles the platform's overall relia...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

The product is stable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

The threat emails are not tailored to our company. It just gives us every newsletter and bombards our email box. The ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cyware Threat Intelligence eXchange?

We use the solution for the correlation of threat feeds and reporting.

See all answers

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

I am familiar with the pricing aspect, setup cost, and licensing cost of Splunk SOAR, and it is pretty much similar t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

There are areas for improvement in Splunk SOAR, such as the need for more code-level customizations despite providing...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 44% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 10% of the time

Swimlane vs Torq

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Torq

Compared 3% of the time

More Torq Competitors

ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 18% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 17% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 13% of the time

Anomali vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 12% of the time

Tines vs Cyware Cyber Fusion

Compared 6% of the time

More Cyware Cyber Fusion Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 12% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 7% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 5% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

January 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

January 2026

Download Cyware Cyber Fusion product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

January 2026

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

No data available

CSOL, Fusion and Threat Response, Threat Intelligence eXchange, Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR)

Phantom

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

More than just a security automation tool, Cyber Fusion unites threat intel and SOAR to automate any security tool, orchestrate any environment, and collaborate across any boundary, to yield more intelligent threat response.

Cyware

Splunk SOAR offers features like automation and orchestration of manual tasks, speeding up work, detection and response to advanced and emerging threats.

Go from overwhelmed to in-control

Automate manual tasks. Address every alert, every day. Establish repeatable procedures that allow security analysts to stop being reactive and focus on mission-critical objectives to protect your business.

Force multiply your team

Orchestrate and automate repetitive tasks, investigation and response to increase efficiency and productivity, and do more with the people you already have. Make a team of three feel like a team of 10.

From 30 minutes to 30 seconds

Work faster with Splunk SOAR. Respond to threats in seconds. Lower your mean time to respond (MTTR) by automating security tasks and workflows across all of your security tools.

End-to-end security operations made easy

Take advantage of Splunk Enterprise Security and Splunk SOAR joining forces to provide a seamless and intuitive SecOps platform to prevent, detect and respond to advanced and emerging threats.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

December 2025

Free Report: Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.