Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cyware Cyber Fusion vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cyware Cyber Fusion
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
22nd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (28th)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Ranking in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
SOC as a Service (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Cyware Cyber Fusion is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is 11.0%, down from 12.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
 

Featured Reviews

AhmedKonsowa - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution with excellent features and a helpful technical support team
We use the solution for cyber fusion centers The product has a lot of strong points compared to other tools. The prices must be reduced. I have been using the solution for one year. I am using the latest version of the solution. I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. In my company,…
NikhilSharma2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to multiple playbooks to fetch data from multiple firewalls and utomated several tasks, including vulnerability scans and SOCL (Security Orchestration, Automation
Recently, they started implementing microservices in XSOAR, which has improved quality and addressed previous issues. However, they should focus more on licensing costs. The user licensing fees are quite high. For example, I received a quote for XSOAR, and it was $12,000 per user per year. If you have a SOC team of 30 members/analysts, you're looking at a substantial expense. They should consider reducing these costs since this high pricing seems to be more about profit. So, there is room for improvement in the pricing. Moreover, the reporting and dashboard features are decent but could be improved. The user interface (UI) is quite heavy and takes time to load, which is a major drawback.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is stable."
"The technical support team is helpful."
"From the security team's standpoint, the solution has improved our organization's overall cybersecurity."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Many different playbooks are available and can be customized."
"The product is quite easy to use."
"The repository of playbooks and the integration between Palo Alto and IBM QRadar are some useful features"
"I would rate the stability of Cortex XSOAR as nine out of ten."
"It is quite scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"The orchestration in XSOAR is significantly easier compared to other SOAR tools I've used."
 

Cons

"The tool doesn't integrate well with ServiceNow."
"The prices must be reduced."
"We need a little hands-on experience to install the solution."
"The dashboard could be better."
"I think they should increase their collaboration base."
"The solution is very expensive."
"Palo Alto needs to develop more AI-centric products."
"The solution requires DV but does not support open-source DV elastic searches."
"With Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, managing its setup phase can be a complicated task."
"There is room for improvement in support. The response time could be faster."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"When I first looked at Demisto, it had a price tag of $250,000 but when we finally purchased it, it was $345,000."
"The solution's cost is high."
"Cortex XSOAR's price could be lower."
"The pricing is fair. The pricing reflects the value and feature set it offers."
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution is based on an annual licensing model that is expensive."
"The solution's cost is reasonable."
"My company did not make any payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product since we were only using its pilot version."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Even though customers often comment on the price, the potential savings come from managing a large number of security events with a limited number of analysts. This leads to economic advantages des...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
The complexity of Cortex XSOAR has a trade-off with its versatility. The product can be tailored for each deployment to respond to specific customer needs, and this complexity may be seen as a down...
 

Also Known As

CSOL, Fusion and Threat Response, Threat Intelligence eXchange, Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR)
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Find out what your peers are saying about Cyware Cyber Fusion vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.