Fortinet FortiSOAR vs Splunk SOAR comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortinet and Splunk are both solutions in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category. Fortinet is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while Splunk is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. Fortinet holds a 3.5% mindshare in SOAR, compared to Splunk’s 7.0% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Fortinet FortiSOAR and Splunk SOAR compete in the security operations category, with Splunk having the edge due to its extensive feature set which is highly valued for comprehensive functionality.

Features: Fortinet FortiSOAR includes customizable dashboards, integrations, and a dynamic case management feature, offering valuable tools for tailored security environments. Splunk SOAR excels with powerful automation capabilities, expansive integration options, and a mature orchestration module, enhancing incident response management.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiSOAR could improve by enhancing its AI integration, expanding its playbook capabilities, and reducing the complexity of configuration. Splunk SOAR could benefit from optimizing its resource consumption, improving support for non-ITSM processes, and simplifying playbook creation to be more user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiSOAR provides flexible deployment models and responsive customer service, facilitating smoother setup for users needing support. Splunk SOAR, on the other hand, offers a structured deployment process and extensive resources, standing out with thorough guidance and documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiSOAR typically presents lower initial setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious buyers and showing strong ROI via efficient scalability. Splunk SOAR has a higher setup cost but users find it justifiable due to its robust features, which contribute to a strong ROI, emphasizing its comprehensive functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Torq

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category, the mindshare of Torq is 3.5%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiSOAR is 3.5%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk SOAR is 7.0%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Splunk SOAR	7.0%
Torq	3.5%
Fortinet FortiSOAR	3.5%
Other	86.0%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Featured Reviews

AdityaDesai

Solutions Architect at ProArch

Automation has streamlined multi-tenant SOC workflows and improves alert handling efficiency

Although the reporting within Torq is not that great, we did ask for many features regarding reporting in Torq, but due to some platform constraints, they could not make the whole dataset available for us to be used in reporting. Except for that, we used some basic reporting. When I used Torq, it was indeed in the early stages of AI capabilities. Only a few customers were allowed to use it, and we were among them. It functioned well as long as we summarized the data properly. If you input garbage, you would get garbage out. Thus, we had to do significant fine-tuning regarding what data context we provided to the AI orchestrator to get meaningful results. In terms of Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management compared to managing multiple point solutions across my security stack, I find it case-centric. The unified view in case management is good since it provides clarity, although there are limitations regarding how many items in case management can be modified at once. Bulk operations are very limited, potentially due to their back-end database or data retrieval processes that can be improved. Regarding improvements for Torq, when we were onboarded, there were aspects we were uncertain about, such as the number of cases that could be generated, what data we could bring in, how many clients we could onboard, and similar concerns. Initially, we also lacked clarity about the number of playbooks or workflows we could build. Different triggers like system triggers, case-based triggers, and others can be employed without restrictions, but when it comes to on-demand and scheduled jobs, there is a limitation based on the subscription and pricing tier that notably caps the number of workflows we can create. No bulk editing across cases was one issue, along with limited filtering related to single grouping constraints. Additionally, the out-of-the-box case templates provided require substantial modifications before they become usable. There is also a feature in the cases for notes that cannot be searched. They are only visible through the UI, which is another area for improvement. The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially. I am not sure if new customers are made aware of this. It seems that workflows revolving around cases hinder functionality outside of case management, as we have many use cases needing on-demand triggers and schedules for functions like reporting or polling devices. Creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers. While they facilitate optimization and scaling, the support received tends to be very basic. Improvements can be made in that area as well.

Read full review

VIJAICYRIAC

Director at Movate

Automated playbooks have reduced response times and provided deeper threat analytics

The effectiveness of Fortinet FortiSOAR playbooks is that they minimize the mean time to response and MTTR, and I think more automation is required to improve the response time. I am working with the Dynamic Case Management feature, and it is dynamic. The Dynamic Case Management feature is more helpful for us to get real-time anomalies and identify the threats. It also assists in real-time response, so it is helpful.

Read full review

Vikash Kushwaha

Full-Stack Software Engineer at mindpathtech

Automated playbooks have transformed incident response and now protect critical services

The biggest advantage I see from my personal experience as an integrator with Splunk SOAR is that it integrates with most of the security features among the Defenders, Microsoft Defender, firewalls, CloudWatch, and AWS security agents, as well as EC2 machines, firewalls, EDR, IAM, email security, and antivirus. It automates the security process over phishing emails and any other brute force attacks. It helps quite a lot because if 100 phishing emails were sent to a domain, a developer can only reach one, two, or five, but for hundreds of others, it actually supports better automated playbooks and provides major security. Splunk SOAR introduced some new and innovative capabilities or approaches that transformed the way my SOC operates. Splunk SOAR provides playbooks for automatic security features, such as for firewalls, phishing mails, and utilizing Defenders or virtual tools. A playbook maintains its algorithms or processes, so if any kind of security issue arises, the playbook automatically runs and handles actions such as IP blocking or resolving brute force attacks, notifying the admin about suspicious users. After implementing Splunk SOAR, the training process for my SOC team to use playbooks takes a long time during the whole integration part, as it retrieves all credentials from us, whether for an EC2 machine or any antivirus. It takes about one to two months for the team to fully sustain and know the processes of the playbooks and security, particularly for three or four individuals in the cyber security or DevOps team. Splunk SOAR significantly reduces the time spent on monotonous security tasks. In banking, insurance, or healthcare, automated services for addressing phishing emails and security threats are common. Having a manual workforce of two or three individuals can only handle five or ten security threats while Splunk SOAR automates the entire process across apps and machines, making it easier and notifying the admin about the threats. If someone tries to breach, Splunk SOAR immediately processes incoming requests, validating them and blocking any unsecured requests, which reduces a lot of time and effort. With the help of the playbook viewer, I assess the visibility provided by Splunk SOAR as very positive, especially for security purposes. If someone is attacked by 100 users, it blocks all the users, while individual developers such as myself can only handle two or three at a time. The automated process of Splunk SOAR handles all the processes concurrently, making it a game-changing solution. It helps reduce mean time to resolve (MTTR). It takes around 10 to 20 minutes to resolve one incident through the whole process and notify the admin of the issue. If there are multiple incidents, calculating the time taken for each, it generally requires around 40 to 50 minutes to resolve five incidents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Torq's unified platform approach to AI, SOAR, automation, and case management is superior compared to my experience managing multiple point solutions."

"Torq has helped a lot regarding SOC analyst efficiency."

"With Torq, I automate actions while achieving SLA compliance and streamline alert investigation processes much better."

"As an analyst, it has demonstrated potential to reduce workforce requirements and time needed for related activities."

"Torq has definitely changed the day-to-day experience for our security analysts, as they feel more excited and feel that Torq interface and workflow allow them to build things themselves."

"Using that one piece of AI, we auto-closed 511 cases in quarter four alone."

"Once I started to use the system and I saw the potential, it changed all of our work in IT."

"What I appreciate most about Torq is that it is an essential part of our system."

More Torq pros

"The solution has many connectors, which is quite helpful."

"The fabrication, management, and communication across a single platform is beautiful."

"The product can be automated for network security purposes. The solution offers a great security automation response."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Fortinet FortiSOAR is a very interactive and user-friendly solution."

"The most fascinating aspect of FortiSOAR is its modern and simple to understand and operate dashboards."

"The solution is easy to implement and includes 450 built-in connectors."

"It has a quick detection and response time."

More Fortinet FortiSOAR pros

"The most valuable feature of Splunk SOAR is the automated playbooks, which saves analysts time."

"The main benefit of using Splunk SOAR is the automation, as a job that would have been very tedious for an analyst to do in terms of removing all the dashboards that haven't been used is now saving space and saving money."

"Integration has made our operations significantly easier, and for phishing investigations, IP checks, and endpoint isolations, our response time to incidents has reduced substantially, and false positives are identified much quicker because of Splunk SOAR."

"Splunk SOAR has saved us a lot; monthly, around 300 hours of effort, it is saving with Splunk SOAR, and it has helped us where we were able to run the SOC operation with the less number of headcount versus what we used to do earlier."

"The primary benefit relates to the response time of our operations team and our team overall, as certain recurring tasks that used to consume approximately 30 to 45 minutes daily are now automated and completed in around 40 minutes, allowing our limited team to achieve a maximum amount of tasks through automation along with AI."

"Splunk SOAR has helped me reduce manual work and improve the speed of incident response, and automating alert enrichment and repetitive investigation steps allows analysts to focus more on actual investigation and high-priority incidents."

"The best feature that Splunk SOAR offers is the no-code/low-code functionality."

"Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part."

More Splunk SOAR pros

Cons

"I wish Torq's AI assistant for building templated workflows from scratch worked better; when you start with a blank slate, asking AI to help you build or template the workflow out does not go well."

"There are some issues and bugs that I think need to be fixed, but they are currently not focused on it."

"We have MCP that we are working with our cloud security platform, and we wanted to connect this MCP to the case management."

"The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially, and creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers."

"Even now, we have workflows that are in production that use AI steps and I get different results, making it unusable to some degree."

"Additionally, the documentation for Torq is not very clear. Most of the information is presented in videos, which are not ideal for reading; there are mostly paragraphs and other text-based content."

"Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes."

"If Torq could enhance its AI features, it would benefit customers significantly by making the platform even more user-friendly."

More Torq cons

"The tool's user interface is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"Fortinet FortiSOAR should improve its analysis."

"Fortinet's tech support overall is not great when they are at their best."

"We need more fine-tuning for ChatGPT, especially when creating connectors."

"FortiSOAR needs to improve the response time for executing playbooks."

"Fortinet is good, however, as they get into security analytics, while their support is okay, sometimes it requires some hand-holding and their response is probably not as good as Palo Alto."

"I don't currently see where the solution is lacking features. For us and for our clients it works very well and we're pleased with it."

"The UI design of the solution needs to be changed since it can get difficult for a newbie to operate."

More Fortinet FortiSOAR cons

"Splunk SOAR does not help me reduce my security event volume; in fact, it makes them massive."

"Improving the integration ecosystem can raise the quality of the bottom tier of the integrations so that they can work better out of the box."

"have put a number of ideas on the ideas.splunk.com site for feature requests for the Splunk SOAR product. I posted one of them about three years ago, which finally got implemented in the latest release that just got announced, so the time to implement new features and things like that is a little bit concerning."

"Splunk SOAR can improve IoT/OT security-related case studies or your use cases. Their integration with identity and access management (IAM) solutions is a bit shaky. They don't have good integration with a lot of IAM solutions. They do have good capability in terms of user access management internally, but even with privileged user access, they have a good module. However, if they have to integrate with solutions, such as CyberArk or IBM IAM solutions they are lacking, the visibility of user access is not that much."

"The tool's response is slower because it has to search through a huge dataset, which can be improved for latency."

"The UI can be more customizable for the clients."

"What we have seen is if the workflow gets halted or if we want to halt a workflow, it cannot be resumed."

"Sometimes it lags when I am working on multiple things."

More Splunk SOAR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution offers both licensing and subscription models that are similar in price to other products."

"Fortinet FortiSOAR is an expensive solution."

"Considering all the features of Fortinet FortiSOAR, I think it has a good price."

"If you compare Fortinet FortiSOAR's price with the prices of the market leader, Palo Alto, then it can be considered a cheaper product."

"Fortinet FortiSOAR is expensive."

"Pricing is fine compared to other solutions."

"The price of the product should be lower. The brand value that Fortinet has, it has the reputation of being a reasonably priced product, and they have an enormous customer base in India. Most of the SME market is covered by FortiGate firewalls. It becomes an easy way for consultants, such as us, or even system integrators, to open the door with the Fortinet product lines."

"Since Africa is struggling with foreign exchange, the solution is pretty expensive there."

"It's very overpriced because it is based on the number of users. There is no bulk licensing."

"I don't know the exact price, but for my region, it is very expensive."

"The cost is high and the licensing is on an annual basis."

"When we first purchased our Splunk SOAR license, it was based on an event-count model. It was based on the number of events. I had strong opinions at the time that automation should not be stifled by the amount of automation you can accomplish, so the previous structure was not as beneficial for us. Later that year, we got told or saw at a conference that they announced user-based pricing. We are now in a renewal period, so we migrated to a user-based license model, which is more appropriate for us so that we no longer have to worry about stifling our automation based on the quantity."

"Splunk is a fast enterprise tool, but it costs too much. At the same time, it's worth what we pay, in my opinion. We can efficiently perform all the functions and tie together the data. It's the perfect tool for our needs."

"Splunk SOAR is more expensive compared to other options for SOAR."

"The licensing cost is reasonable."

"While I can't confirm the exact pricing, some colleagues have mentioned that Splunk SOAR may be on the costlier side."

More Splunk SOAR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	53

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?

There are some bugs in Torq, of course. They can be present in data transformation, some UI debugging, and other area...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Torq?

My main use case for Torq is the automation of cyber security processes through a SOAR platform and APIs. A main exam...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Torq?

Regarding someone thinking about using Torq, I recommend looking into their provided academy to start working with th...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiSOAR?

The product is expensive, but it is a value-for-money product. It is a good product to invest in, eventually securing...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiSOAR?

Fortinet FortiSOAR has to be updated on the recent threats. Threats are changing, and it has to be updated to meet th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiSOAR?

I have been working in my field for almost four years, but right now I am not using it because my current company is ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?

For pricing, I would rate Splunk SOAR a seven where one is high price and ten is low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?

Splunk SOAR could be improved by making playbook development easier for new users and providing better troubleshootin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Splunk Phantom?

My main use case for Splunk SOAR is automating repetitive SOC tasks and speeding up incident response, and I mainly u...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tines vs Torq

Compared 23% of the time

Blink Ops vs Torq

Compared 13% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Torq

Compared 9% of the time

Dropzone AI vs Torq

Compared 8% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Torq

Compared 3% of the time

More Torq Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 22% of the time

Securonix SOAR vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 10% of the time

D3 Security vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 6% of the time

Playbooks vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightConnect vs Fortinet FortiSOAR

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiSOAR Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 11% of the time

Tines vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 8% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Cloud vs Splunk SOAR

Compared 6% of the time

More Splunk SOAR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Torq

August 2026

Download Torq product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSOAR

September 2026

Download Fortinet FortiSOAR product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk SOAR

August 2026

Download Splunk SOAR product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberSponse, FortiSOAR

Phantom

Overview

Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.

Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.

What are the key features of Torq?

Adaptive Agentic Insights: Provides real-time threat intelligence tailored to specific security challenges.
Automation: Automates responses to security incidents, minimizing manual intervention requirements.
Threat Lifecycle Management: Comprehensive handling of threats from detection to remediation.
Telemetry Aggregation: Integrates data across platforms for a unified security overview.

Why consider Torq based on reviews?

Efficiency: Users notice significant reductions in time spent managing threats.
Risk Reduction: Enhanced ability to identify and address critical threats promptly.
Resource Optimization: Allows teams to allocate effort to other critical tasks by reducing manual security operations.
Scalability: Adaptable to meet the demands of growing or changing infrastructures.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.

Torq

Fortinet FortiSOAR offers a comprehensive platform for automating and managing security operations. It streamlines cyber incident response and integrates with existing security systems for effective threat detection and remediation.

FortiSOAR is designed to enhance security operations through its automation capabilities and seamless platform integration. Its playbooks allow for quick response and efficient policy application, simplifying incident management and network security tasks. The centralized analytics and intuitive dashboards support threat intelligence management and workflow automation. Despite its benefits, FortiSOAR has areas for improvement, such as third-party integration, user-friendliness, and a high learning curve which affects playbook creation. Documentation and technical support need enhancement to facilitate better user experience, along with refining its pricing model and improving orchestration with network devices.

What are the top features of Fortinet FortiSOAR?

Playbooks: Enable rapid response and streamlined policy application.
Centralized Analytics: Provides comprehensive insights for effective threat management.
Automation Support: Simplifies incident management and network security tasks.
Integration: Offers seamless connectivity with diverse platforms via built-in connectors.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Facilitates intuitive navigation and display of essential data.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Human Error: Automates tasks like incident validation and IP blocking.
Enhanced Threat Intelligence: Improves security through SIEM compatibility and comprehensive monitoring.
Streamlined Workflows: Automates processes like ticket processing and system isolation.

Fortinet FortiSOAR is utilized across industries for its ability to manage security operations and case management efficiently. In sectors such as finance and healthcare, FortiSOAR automates responses to cyber threats, aiding in compliance and data protection. Its integration with security technologies supports robust threat intelligence, vital for sectors that process sensitive information.

Fortinet

Splunk SOAR focuses on automating security operations with seamless third-party integrations and customizable workflows, enhancing incident response and threat management.

Splunk SOAR offers robust playbook automation and powerful API connectivity, allowing organizations to streamline workflows and integrate extensively with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow. With its capabilities in real-time data visualization and automated threat responses, it significantly enhances security and reduces manual efforts. Users appreciate the ease of creating playbooks, which reduces mean time to detect and resolve. However, attention to its integration challenges with Microsoft products, the need for more playbooks, and improved customization tools is necessary. Enhancements in the development process, visibility, scalability, and case management options are also beneficial. Improving documentation and training resources would add more depth and accessibility.

What are the top features of Splunk SOAR?

Third-party integrations: Supports extensive integration with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow.
Playbook automation: Facilitates easy creation and management of automated workflows.
Customizable workflows: Offers Python-based customization for tailored security operations.
API connectivity: Powerful API support for seamless tool consolidation and streamlined workflows.
Data visualization: Provides real-time data visualization for enhanced situational awareness.

What benefits or ROI users should consider?

Operational efficiency: Reduces mean time to detect and resolve incidents through automation.
Manual effort reduction: Automates threat responses, minimizing manual workload in security operations.
Enhanced security: Offers end-to-end visibility and automated threat mitigation processes.
Time savings: Optimizes processes and improves response efficiency in cybersecurity operations.

Organizations implement Splunk SOAR in industries to automate tasks in Security Operation Centers, addressing incidents such as phishing, brute force, and ransomware. It integrates with third-party applications for threat intelligence enrichment, commonly deployed both on-premise and cloud, enhancing cybersecurity efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Recorded Future, Blackstone

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR

September 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiSOAR vs. Splunk SOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.