


Logpoint and Splunk SOAR are both significant players in the SIEM and SOAR markets, offering distinctive features to address security challenges. Splunk SOAR seems to have the upper hand in automation and integration, crucial for larger operations with complex security needs.
Features: Logpoint is known for its comprehensive log collection, integrated SIEM and SOAR solution, and flexible pricing model based on devices rather than data use. Its efficient integration capabilities and ease of use make it appealing to various budgets. Splunk SOAR is recognized for its exceptional automation, especially enhanced by its customizable playbook features, which improve incident response times. Its comprehensive alert management and integration capabilities stand out.
Room for Improvement: Logpoint can enhance cloud-native capabilities and simplify dashboard customization. Handling complex log parsing and integration with non-standard logs are areas for development. Pricing flexibility limits its reach to smaller businesses. Splunk SOAR needs better scalability for smaller enterprises and improved integration with third-party applications. Its high cost and complexity in playbook creation need addressing.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint emphasizes on-premises deployments, offering praised technical support, though it can be slow for complex issues. Its straightforward deployment process is undermined by the lack of robust cloud solutions. Splunk SOAR's deployment options are complex but offer hybrid and cloud-based solutions, with quick problem resolution. However, interaction and support are areas needing better management, especially with outsourced support.
Pricing and ROI: Logpoint's fixed-cost pricing model offers predictability and mid-range pricing, perceived as good value compared to other SIEM solutions. Splunk SOAR's high pricing is offset by its advanced features, providing value in large deployments. Its shift to user-based licensing is positive, though upfront costs remain a challenge for smaller enterprises. Both aim for good ROI through different models.
Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts. It is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert.
By the time we officially bought Torq, we already had two workflows that were very helpful to us.
It pretty much took until we got to our first renewal where we said that this is the value we see, this is the things we want more, but that is the first place where we said we are happy enough that we want to renew.
Since deploying Splunk SOAR, there has been a notable reduction in time spent on monotonous security tasks, which I estimate to be around 95%, enabling my team to focus on more strategic initiatives.
We've seen a decrease in false positives and a significant increase in our containment.
Monthly, around 300 hours of effort, it is saving with Splunk SOAR.
The speed and quality of their answers have been pretty good, as I usually get a response within 24 hours, and they follow up well.
We can always get an answer, and the support team are experts in their own system.
Nine out of ten times, they give me a solution even if it is not the solution I wanted, and I still can get to the result.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
Discovering different troubleshooting methods is harder to do with Splunk SOAR than with Enterprise Security or other Splunk services.
We always have a customer support representative who will come in the picture and help us to direct any ticket or any issue that we are facing to the right team.
I have worked with Splunk SOAR's technical support or customer service, which I find to be as perfect as Splunk SIEM
Our case management is super scalable.
In terms of scalability, you can do as long as you can build it, and they can support it.
Regarding the ability of the solution to grow in your work environment, if it is scalable, if it fits your business requirements, and if there is room to scale up, the answer is yes, for sure.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
It can be extended and adapted as necessary.
Regarding scalability, I find it to be a nine, as we have had no issues with scaling Splunk SOAR.
Everyone is ingesting Copilots or some form of AI in their platforms, and Splunk SOAR doesn't have it yet.
Most of the time, the system is stable as long as the components that they integrate with are stable.
I have never faced any downtime or issues.
Regarding stability, I have noticed some lagging, crashing, and downtime, which is one of my largest gripes.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
We have not experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
We have not seen any impact in the work that we do with Splunk SOAR or the SIEM platform.
I have not encountered any outages or glitches within my experience with Splunk SOAR.
Torq should offer default templates that can directly scan firewall data and automate actions.
It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet.
From an engineering perspective, I think more error messages and error handling information for our engineering team would be very helpful.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
If we start ingesting those data to Splunk SOAR or SIEM with some sort of integration with threat intelligence feed, that will also improve our detection and prediction method or help us with the investigation.
Although it enhances alert handling, it still has a journey to compete with Palo Alto SOAR and FortiSOAR.
Splunk's Unified Platform does help consolidate networking security and IT observability tools.
When they bring more and more value into the platform, it makes more sense to pay that price, but still, it is expensive.
Before deciding to implement Torq, I considered that compared to our old case management platform, Torq was a much better price and had a lot better value for what you get out of the platform, which was a key consideration for the company.
It is an expensive solution, not an inexpensive solution, but we get through the flexibility.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
It is way below what it costs to hire some professionals to do only that type of work.
Splunk SOAR is moderately priced, neither cheap nor overly expensive.
I am familiar with the pricing aspect, setup cost, and licensing cost of Splunk SOAR, and it is pretty much similar to what industries are offering these days.
Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management has significantly benefited us by integrating the case management platform with the automation, which saves time compared to managing multiple point solutions across our security stack.
The fact that I can build whatever I want within my own imagination and skills without relying on code is the best thing about Torq.
You can copy and paste a cURL command. If you have documentation or APIs, you usually have an example on the side. You basically have all the information on how the API call should be. You can just copy that and paste it into a step, and it will just build the step for you.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
The most valuable feature, which is endpoint security, is included in Logpoint, and an extra feature is the integration.
Creating playbooks using the Playbook Editor in Splunk SOAR is easy. The editor is designed to be user-friendly with visual drag and drop features, allowing for easy workflows without writing any code.
Splunk SOAR saves time in threat response, and the time to solve an incident is currently the best in the market.
Splunk SOAR has improved our MTTD and MTTR both with the consolidation with a unified platform with Splunk.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk SOAR | 7.4% |
| Torq | 3.7% |
| Logpoint | 1.9% |
| Other | 87.0% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 37 |
Torq is the enterprise AI SOC solution that effectively combines adaptive insights and automation to handle critical threats efficiently. It manages threat lifecycles, swiftly moving from triage to response, ensuring effective risk management.
Torq is designed to streamline security operations by aggregating telemetry across your security stack. It investigates significant risks and manages threats from triage to containment and remediation. This AI-driven tool enhances the capabilities of your SecOps team, allowing them to achieve more impactful results without introducing complicated processes.
What are the key features of Torq?In industries like finance and healthcare, Torq shows effectiveness by adapting to specific risk scenarios often encountered in these fields. Its integration with existing infrastructures makes it a valuable asset for maintaining stringent security standards, essential for protecting critical data and operations in diverse high-stakes environments.
Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.
Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.
What are the most important features of Logpoint?Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.
Splunk SOAR focuses on automating security operations with seamless third-party integrations and customizable workflows, enhancing incident response and threat management.
Splunk SOAR offers robust playbook automation and powerful API connectivity, allowing organizations to streamline workflows and integrate extensively with tools like Salesforce and ServiceNow. With its capabilities in real-time data visualization and automated threat responses, it significantly enhances security and reduces manual efforts. Users appreciate the ease of creating playbooks, which reduces mean time to detect and resolve. However, attention to its integration challenges with Microsoft products, the need for more playbooks, and improved customization tools is necessary. Enhancements in the development process, visibility, scalability, and case management options are also beneficial. Improving documentation and training resources would add more depth and accessibility.
What are the top features of Splunk SOAR?Organizations implement Splunk SOAR in industries to automate tasks in Security Operation Centers, addressing incidents such as phishing, brute force, and ransomware. It integrates with third-party applications for threat intelligence enrichment, commonly deployed both on-premise and cloud, enhancing cybersecurity efforts.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.