Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Check Point VPN facilitates remote work, enhances flexibility, and offers cost savings with returns between 40%-100%, boosting stability.
Sentiment score
7.1
Cisco Secure Client offers seamless, user-friendly connectivity, simplifying remote work despite unclear direct ROI.
It reduces the dependency on being physically present in the office and enhances the overall user experience, saving time and maintaining security.
In this case, everything is pre-inbuilt, allowing me to easily create new users and share their details so they can connect to Check Point VPN and access internal servers.
I have seen a return on investment with fewer employees needed and time saved.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.7
Check Point Remote Access VPN support is appreciated overall, but issues with response times and escalation processes exist.
Sentiment score
6.7
Users find Cisco support knowledgeable and effective, despite occasional access difficulties, relying often on internal IT for Secure Client.
Contacting the Technical Assistance Centers (TACs) initially can be difficult, but once I get in touch with the TAC team, it is easy to solve problems.
The customer support for Check Point Remote Access VPN has been very helpful and responsive whenever we needed assistance.
It takes multiple days to get the issue escalated to someone that can actually help.
Cisco offers very high-quality customer service.
Cisco technical support is difficult, and it requires lots of contracts.
Over the years, there's been a decline in the quality, mainly in areas such as the experience level of support engineers and the time taken to address and escalate issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers scalability and reliability, efficiently supporting numerous users with flexible licensing and robust architecture.
Sentiment score
7.3
Cisco Secure Client is scalable and effective for thousands of users, with flexible licensing for diverse environments and remote work.
Currently, 130 users can connect simultaneously, and it is very reliable and efficient.
I don't see that we can hit any kind of roof in our organization.
The scalability of Check Point Remote Access VPN is good as it supports a large number of remote users simultaneously.
A smaller firewall can handle fewer sessions, while a larger one can handle tens of thousands of sessions.
The scalability of Cisco Secure Client depends on the hardware I choose.
Regarding scalability, Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) rates as excellent because we can scale out by simply buying more licenses from the vendor.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Check Point Remote Access VPN offers stable, reliable connections, efficiently supporting growth and thousands of users with minimal downtime.
Sentiment score
8.0
Cisco Secure Client is highly stable and reliable, with user satisfaction and minimal technical issues reported, scoring 8-10 regularly.
Check Point Remote Access VPN is very stable.
I would rate the stability ten out of ten.
The stability is really good, and I would rate it up to nine.
Regarding the performance of Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect), I have not seen any issues because performance-wise it functions properly.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Remote Access VPN faces challenges with complexity, support, integration, pricing, scalability, and lacks automation and intuitive features.
Users desire improvements in Cisco Secure Client's interface, ease of use, connectivity, security, updates, and integration with systems.
The response time is much worse, with the first layer of support lacking sufficient knowledge on how to troubleshoot issues.
Deploying these solutions requires higher technical expertise than other solutions.
Check Point Remote Access VPN can be improved by having more granular options to steer traffic, like easier configurations for split tunneling, which is currently complex.
I am using Intune for deployments, and it's not easy to create an automated deployment where users do not need to register server addresses.
Vendors offer more features, such as a kill switch.
Cisco's security portfolio, including Secure Client and the firewalls, is falling behind.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Remote Access VPN is affordable with straightforward licensing, balancing price and security while integrating well with NGFW.
Cisco Secure Client pricing is reasonable with term-based licensing, but some users find it costly compared to free competitors.
It is competitively priced, and we have chosen it for its market leadership in the firewall space.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are straightforward, though the setup is a bit expensive.
The pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Check Point Remote Access VPN are a bit low compared to my previous solution.
Palo Alto and Fortinet provide free VPN connections, but Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) requires a license purchase.
I perceive the pricing to be a seven, however, I have perpetual licenses.
The pricing seems to align equally with other competitors like Palo Alto during a competitive situation.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Remote Access VPN ensures secure, scalable connectivity with seamless integration, strong encryption, and centralized management for remote users.
Cisco Secure Client provides seamless, secure VPN access with user-friendly setup, cross-platform support, and integration with enterprise software.
The functionality enables secure access for remotely connecting users, which is necessary for our operations.
We don't know what vulnerabilities exist in outside networks, so when they connect to Check Point Remote Access VPN, they enter the internal network where traffic is monitored by my firewall, which provides comprehensive threat protection and prevents users from connecting to malware.
Check Point Remote Access VPN has positively impacted my organization by improving productivity and given us a workaround in times of downtime.
Beneficial for businesses needing secure access outside the office.
Additionally, it gives the user flexibility of working from anywhere, which is a major feature we are looking at.
Cisco Secure Client's AnyConnect VPN's reliability has been absolutely wonderful, as well as the ability to connect from any network, regardless of location.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
78
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (5th)
Cisco Secure Client (includ...
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
77
Ranking in other categories
SSL VPN (1st), ZTNA as a Service (10th), Cisco Security Portfolio (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 3.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) is 6.8%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)6.8%
Check Point Remote Access VPN3.8%
Other89.4%
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

Gfrancis Francis - PeerSpot reviewer
Has provided secure remote access for years but inconsistent support delays resolution
Regarding logging and management, while some of the logging is really good, other times it's not so great, and we've had to reach out to Check Point a few times for assistance, and the support we've gained hasn't been up to par with what Check Point usually offers as part of their support. When it comes to improvements, not specifically the remote access VPN, but the support associated with Check Point products has fallen over the last two years, and the response time is much worse, with the first layer of support lacking sufficient knowledge on how to troubleshoot issues.
Wouter Beer - PeerSpot reviewer
Generates revenue through service offering while needing additional safety features
The primary use case for Cisco Secure Client, including AnyConnect, is as a VPN for remote access I use AnyConnect because I have Cisco infrastructure. It utilizes certificates, which allows for automatic setup. The security features are beneficial, and the whole idea of the app is that it should…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
34%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business36
Midsize Enterprise31
Large Enterprise33
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise46
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
Regarding logging and management, while some of the logging is really good, other times it's not so great, and we've had to reach out to Check Point a few times for assistance, and the support we'v...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
My main use case for Check Point Remote Access VPN is to allow remote users access into our network to get access to our resources that are secured behind the Check Point firewall. A remote user ty...
What do you like most about Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?
The tool is user-friendly, robust and easy to use in any environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?
Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) is somewhat expensive compared to others such as Fortinet or Palo Alto, which provide free VPN when the firewall is purchased. Palo Alto and Fortinet prov...
What needs improvement with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client?
At times there is confusion regarding when to keep the proxy on or off, a problem faced by some users.
 

Also Known As

Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
MST, Molina Healthcare, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers, Arup, New South Wales Rural FireService
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.