Top 10 Check Point Remote Access VPN Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies

4.3 out of 5

71 reviews
98% willing to recommend

358 followers

Top Check Point Remote Access VPN Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point Remote Access VPN based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, and Fortinet FortiClient. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point Remote Access VPN surpasses its competitors by offering seamless connectivity with advanced security features, user-friendly interfaces, and multi-platform support, ensuring secure and efficient remote work environments.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Microsoft Intune

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Intune

4.1 out of 5

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, aiding tech buyers in device management through its Azure console. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN emphasizes secure connectivity, ideal for organizations prioritizing security with integration into Check Point firewall infrastructure.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Microsoft Intune Report

Pricing

Microsoft Intune involves higher setup costs, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a more cost-effective setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Intune involves higher setup costs, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a more cost-effective setup.

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Check Point Remote Access VPN offers seamless access control and valued features for security, though its Linux support could improve. In comparison, Prisma Access provides enterprise-class security and excels in cloud deployments, despite a high setup time for policy changes.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Check Point Remote Access VPN has a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Remote Access VPN has a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment.

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiClient integrates with its Unified Threat Protection bundle for a cost-effective, all-in-one solution, making it ideal for those seeking comprehensive security. In comparison, Check Point balances robust security and integration with its existing firewalls, appealing to enterprises prioritizing rigorous protection.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiClient's setup cost is lower compared to Check Point Remote Access VPN, offering users a more economical initial expense. Conversely, Check Point presents higher setup costs but may include enhanced initial features.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services offers cost-effective integration with Windows environments for centralized application management. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN delivers robust security features, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing secure remote connections with comprehensive security policies.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Microsoft Remote Desktop Services Report

Pricing

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services setup costs are relatively high, while Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a more affordable initial investment. These differences might influence user preferences based on budget considerations.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

4.2 out of 5

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

4.2 out of 5

Citrix DaaS offers easy virtual desktop management and high scalability, benefiting enterprises needing robust virtualization. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN provides seamless network security with strong multi-factor authentication, appealing to businesses focused on secure remote access and existing Check Point ecosystem integration.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Report

Pricing

Citrix DaaS features a straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while Check Point Remote Access VPN may involve higher setup expenses due to its robust security features.

View comparison

Pricing

Citrix DaaS features a straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while Check Point Remote Access VPN may involve higher setup expenses due to its robust security features.

OpenVPN Access Server

4.2 out of 5

OpenVPN Access Server

4.2 out of 5

Check Point Remote Access VPN integrates seamlessly with Check Point firewalls, offering robust built-in security features. In comparison, OpenVPN Access Server is open-source, versatile across operating systems, and affordable for smaller deployments, emphasizing adaptability and economical deployment.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. OpenVPN Access Server Report

Pricing

Check Point Remote Access VPN has higher setup costs and includes extensive security features, whereas OpenVPN Access Server offers a more affordable setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Remote Access VPN has higher setup costs and includes extensive security features, whereas OpenVPN Access Server offers a more affordable setup, appealing to budget-conscious users.

TeamViewer

4.3 out of 5

TeamViewer

4.3 out of 5

TeamViewer excels in remote IT services across platforms with no need for user credentials input. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN offers seamless access to on-premises resources with centralized management and robust firewall integration, suitable for high-security needs.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. TeamViewer Report

Pricing

TeamViewer has a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Check Point Remote Access VPN requires a higher setup investment, highlighting distinct pricing approaches between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

4.2 out of 5

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect)

4.2 out of 5

Check Point Remote Access VPN integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructures, offering flexibility and fine-grained control. In comparison, Cisco Secure Client emphasizes ease of use and performance across platforms. Check Point enhances enterprise control, while Cisco offers robust security and connectivity for diverse environments.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) Report

Pricing

Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, unlike Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect), which may involve extra setup fees. This difference highlights a potential cost advantage for Check Point with initial configurations.

View comparison

Pricing

Claroty Platform

4.1 out of 5

Claroty Platform

4.1 out of 5

Check Point Remote Access VPN facilitates seamless integration with existing Check Point firewalls and convenient multifactor authentication. In comparison, Claroty Platform excels in threat detection tailored for industrial environments, focusing on secure remote access and enhanced protocol support for specialized niche needs.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Claroty Platform Report

Pricing

Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a straightforward setup at a moderate cost, while Claroty Platform involves a more complex setup with higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point Remote Access VPN offers a straightforward setup at a moderate cost, while Claroty Platform involves a more complex setup with higher initial expenses.

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway

4.2 out of 5

Check Point Remote Access VPN integrates with Active Directory and multi-factor authentication while offering seamless connectivity without extra hardware. In comparison, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is noted for scalability within Azure but needs better monitoring tools, making it ideal for cloud environments.

Download Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway Report

Pricing

Check Point Remote Access VPN has a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, which is higher due to more comprehensive integration features. Azure VPN Gateway justifies its price with seamless cloud service connectivity.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 23 more products

Related categories

Remote Access

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Configuration Management