Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs Sangfor EasyConnect comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
71
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (6th)
Sangfor EasyConnect
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 3.8%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sangfor EasyConnect is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

Ozan Durmus - PeerSpot reviewer
Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve
The deployment takes around two to three hours. If you manage the product, one person could be enough, but if you need some kind of additional integrations like ADA integration, you need someone from ADT to access products. One person is enough, but one or two additional personnel may be included. To deploy Check Point Remote Access VPN, you must purchase a license, enable the blade, and purchase client access licenses. You can then follow the instructions to deploy the product, write the necessary rules, make the integrations, deploy the agent to the clients, and provide them with a login solution. I rate the initial setup an eight on a scale of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
SH
Easy to use and has a straightforward user interface
The solution is very straightforward and easy to connect. Sangfor EasyConnect is quite a secured product. The solution is easy to use and has a straightforward user interface The design of the user interface could be improved. The solution should have an AI feature that provides proactive alerts…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Among its most valuable features is how it quickly and easily connects everyone to the VPN service."
"Thanks to all these security processes, our users can access our infrastructure with the certainty that we will not be compromised."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN is a stable solution."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN positively impacts our organization by improving productivity, as employees are able to work even when they're not in the facilities, which is a plus for us."
"The solution offers high scalability as far as adding more users."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point Remote Access VPN is its ability to deploy. It follows the same process as their stateful inspection firewall or IPS. If you know how to enable one feature, you can enable and configure others. The learning curve isn't steep."
"The IPSec VPN, Mobile Access, and Identity Awareness are three of the blades with which we have been working with since the pandemic. This has given us great mobility, making our network more dynamic."
"The secure hotspot access for enabling good network connectivity is great."
"The solution is easy to use and has a straightforward user interface."
 

Cons

"I would like this service to be easier to manage when you integrate it with third parties."
"The ability to allow split-tunneling while still following our corporate policy needs to be on the table."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN can be improved by having more granular options to steer traffic, like easier configurations for split tunneling, which is currently complex."
"Connection of devices from various locations is efficient though there are a few challenges when there is a network failure."
"The Linux version may have an app (similar to Windows) instead of a shell script."
"This is the best version we are using, however, if some changes can be made in the next release, I'd like to see adjustments to the time period and internet connectivity."
"Generally, the license is included with the Check Point gateway licensing, however, in terms of the number of users that can be activated for use, it is generally five users."
"They need to increase their timeout. Right now, it will fail after ten seconds, however, it shouldn't fail until after 20 seconds."
"The design of the user interface could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company makes yearly payments only towards the licensing costs attached to Check Point Remote Access VPN, as there are no extra costs attached to the product."
"The product is expensive. I rate its pricing a ten out of ten. For the cost of one product, we could purchase two or three Fortinet solutions with the same amount of money."
"Regarding pricing, as a global customer, we get a big discount. For us, it's a good return on investment. We need to pay for additional features we want to enable. It seems cheaper than other vendors, but I can't say what it would cost an average customer."
"The solution is pretty expensive. The rating is an eight."
"I can say that the licensing costs are charged annually."
"I give the price of the solution a five out of ten."
"There is a license required for this solution."
"The price of this product is good."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Healthcare Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
One area that could be improved is the complexity of setting up Check Point Remote Access VPN, particularly with features like multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, and identity awareness. D...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
We are resellers of Check Point products in our country, and our customers use Check Point Remote Access VPN to keep their organization data clean and safe when users access remotely through the cl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sangfor EasyConnect?
On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive and ten is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with Sangfor EasyConnect?
The design of the user interface could be improved. The solution should have an AI feature that provides proactive alerts when your infrastructure lacks best practices.
What advice do you have for others considering Sangfor EasyConnect?
We're quite equipped with resources for maintaining the solution. One person would be sufficient to maintain Sangfor EasyConnect. The solution’s integration with other Sangfor products is quite eas...
 

Also Known As

Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), The Royal Malaysian Customs Department, ShunSin Technology Holdings Limited, Carsem, Sunway University
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, OpenVPN, Microsoft and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: May 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.