Check Point SandBlast Network vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Veritas are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while Veritas is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 3.5% mindshare in ATP, compared to Veritas’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Veritas users who would recommend it.

Check Point SandBlast Network

Read 42 Check Point SandBlast Network reviews

2,704 Views
2,542 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Read 14 Veritas Alta SaaS Protection reviews

2,503 Views
701 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Check Point SandBlast Network

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Check Point SandBlast Network and Veritas Alta SaaS Protection compete in the advanced security solutions category. Check Point appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive threat prevention features and robust security capabilities, though Veritas is noted for its seamless integration and ease of use within cloud environments.

Features: Check Point SandBlast Network offers advanced threat prevention with features like zero-day threat protection, sandboxing, and threat extraction. It efficiently mitigates email, endpoint, and network security threats. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection provides comprehensive backup and recovery with user-friendly interfaces and strong cloud integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Check Point SandBlast Network could enhance support for diverse file types, customization options, and interface usability. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection should consider refining its pricing strategy and technical support, addressing complexities in licensing and service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point SandBlast Network supports diverse deployments, including hybrid and on-premises, with noted inconsistencies in support. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection offers straightforward integration for public clouds but faces challenges with technical support and issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point SandBlast Network is viewed as costly yet offers significant ROI through comprehensive security features. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection has mid-range pricing, perceived as fair by some, but others express concerns about its cost versus feature set. Both solutions offer valuable security and operational confidence.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point SandBlast Network

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SaaS Backup (18th), SaaS Management Platforms (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Check Point SandBlast Network is 3.5%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is 1.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point SandBlast Network	3.5%
Veritas Alta SaaS Protection	1.6%
Other	94.9%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Mayur Wadekar

Technical Specialist at Softcell Technologies Limited

Comprehensive security solution mitigates advanced threats

Improvements for Check Point SandBlast Network can be seen in dashboard usability; the threat emulation logs and analysis reports could be made more intuitive and visually appealing. Enhancing the system for granular tuning to reduce false positives and allowing benign files to bypass checks more simply for non-expert users would be beneficial. Additionally, faster emulation times could be achieved by increasing file scanning speed through hardware productivity enhancements. A specific instance where file scanning speed posed an issue was when the time taken depended on the file size. Scanning can take less than a minute or up to 2 minutes for larger files. Enhancing the file scanning time would be a significant improvement to the system.

Read full review

Sammy Githinji

Technical Manager at Rigor Systems Limited

Experience with offsite backup enhances data integrity and reduces on-premise reliance

One of the features of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection that customers are looking for is immutability. This is the most important feature. With the cloud, Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is actually in the cloud, which means they have unlimited space to do their backups. They can expand on a need-to-need basis. The automated recovery feature of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection makes the recovery much easier, as opposed to earlier methods where we were using scripts to do the restore. Currently, it's automated so you just do a click. You select the feature in a graphical interface, making it easy to use even for a newbie.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Working for a Check Point partner we utilise Check Point's endpoint solution in our day to day work and the most valuable benefit is knowing I am being protected from email, endpoint and removable media attacks and when attacks occur I am likely to weather the storm better than other users."

"The most valuable feature is comprehensive threat prevention, whether signature-based or a zero-day secure network."

"Check Point has enabled us to detect a lot of threats and prevented a lot of threats from entering our environments. It has kept us safe."

"Threat Emulation gives networks the necessary protection against unknown threats in files that are attached to emails. The Threat Emulation engine picks up malware at the exploit phase before it enters the network. It quickly quarantines and runs the files in a virtual sandbox, which imitates a standard operating system, to discover malicious behavior before hackers can apply evasion techniques to bypass the sandbox."

"It provides a high rate of catching the zero-day advanced threats."

"Preventing zero-day threats and extracting potential threats from incoming files with Threat Extraction is the most valuable feature for us."

"The forensics reports and the ability to sandbox malware are its most valuable features."

"The most efficient and protective characteristics of Check Point's SandBlast solution are that we can see a lot of this protection at the network and mail levels."

More Check Point SandBlast Network pros

"It's very comprehensive. It's one of the first brands to appear in its field."

"The duplication is the solution's most valuable feature."

"What I like most about Veritas SaaS Backup is that it is easy to work on and has compatible features."

"I would recommend anybody to buy this solution and use it."

"The automated recovery feature of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection makes the recovery much easier, as opposed to earlier methods where we were using scripts to do the restore."

"The most valuable features are the ease of administration and the ease of configuration."

"The solution is stable; I haven't experienced any bugs or glitches on it."

"I think the most important feature is the ability of SaaS Backup to cover all modules proposed by Office 365, because competing solutions don't cover the total scope."

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection pros

Cons

"We have noticed a slight performance hit when the Threat Emulation and Extraction features were enabled, but the protection trade-off is worth it for us."

"The knowledge base of Check Point SandBlast Network contains some confusing context, which might be confusing while configuring and designing."

"I would like for them to improve the visibility in the product."

"We have found a need for the application to be a bit more elastic, bringing it to SAS services and not IAS."

"The Threat Emulation software blade significantly affects the performance of the NGFWs, we have a significant increase in the CPU and memory consumption."

"There have been a couple of things that we've tried where we read through the documentation, and we were really looking for some help in implementing, and technical support wanted me to try it first, then call them if it breaks. It would be nicer if they would hold my hand a bit more. It makes me nervous in production, as I don't have a lab."

"The guides or best practices of Check Point are difficult to find for the client. Therefore, it is sometimes difficult to make better implementations."

"I would like for them to improve the visibility in the product."

More Check Point SandBlast Network cons

"Licensing has been a struggle. It went from bronze, silver to gold. Licensing needs more sophistication. It has features that are sold as separate add-ons."

"The solution does lack a lot of features, and we're considering switching."

"In the future, we would like to see support for virtualized machines."

"The usability of the solution isn't the best."

"Other people will prefer this solution because they're used to it. However, from my point of view, you have more breaks, more failures on it than you will with Commvault."

"An area for improvement is the product's performance, especially how long it takes to do a job."

"The implementation could be improved. The server setup is very easy, but some specific client implementation, for example, Oracle or SQL servers, are a little bit complicated. they should offer a bit more assistance with the setup for these particular items."

"The program is quite expensive and I am not impressed by their technical support."

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think the overall cost for introducing Check Point with SandBlast was reasonable and competitive in the market."

"The pricing is quite effective, not excessively high. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the pricing a nine."

"We would like to try the Threat Extraction blade, but you need to buy a license. Check Point is expensive. I would like to buy things, but I would need the funding."

"The cost of Check Point SandBlast Network is annually, and there is only a standard license."

"We have seen ROI."

"The cost is not significantly high and it can be negotiated during any purchase of NGFW."

"The product's cost is high."

"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."

"I would rate this solution's pricing as five out of five."

"This solution is not cheap and not expensive but priced in the mid-range."

"SaaS Backup isn't the most expensive solution."

"The tool is expensive compared to Veeam."

"The program is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My experience with pricing and setup cost is that pricing was a bit high, but the setup cost was initially justified.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point SandBlast Network?

I feel that Check Point SandBlast Network could be improved with slight delays in cleaning the file delivery. Additionally, I think it requires proper tuning to avoid unnecessary notifications.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point SandBlast Network?

My main use case for Check Point SandBlast Network is advanced threat protection, especially for scanning emails, attachments, web downloads, and incoming files through a sandbox environment. A qui...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is slightly expensive, but they can do more on it. The exact figure for Veritas Alta SaaS Protection depends on the size of data being stored, the region, and the type ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

For Veritas Alta SaaS Protection, the only challenge is downtime and the impact of time synchronization whereby different customers are on different time zones, and Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veritas Alto SaaS Protection?

For the customers that I'm dealing with, they are using Veritas Alta SaaS Protection for long-term retention and offline backups. This means they don't have to constrain their on-premise resources....

See all answers

Comparisons

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 28% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 18% of the time

MetaDefender vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 8% of the time

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps vs Check Point SandBlast Network

Compared 3% of the time

More Check Point SandBlast Network Competitors

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Backup vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Own Data Platform vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix Network Detection and Response vs Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Veritas Alta SaaS Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network

May 2026

Download Check Point SandBlast Network product report

Buyer's Guide

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

April 2026

Download Veritas Alta SaaS Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

SaaS Backup

Overview

Check Point SandBlast Network is trusted for advanced threat prevention, employing real-time threat detection and AI-powered analysis to secure corporate environments from zero-day attacks and file-based exploits.

Focused on comprehensive security, SandBlast Network integrates seamlessly with smart security tools to deliver proactive threat prevention. The network leverages sandboxing for zero-day threats, sanitizes email attachments, and frequently updates threat signatures. Threat Emulation and Extraction are key, preventing malicious file downloads and minimizing disruptions while retaining originals for in-depth analysis. Effective at securing emails and web downloads, it offers robust protection against phishing and ransomware.

What are Check Point SandBlast Network's standout features?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Continuously monitors threats as they appear.
Sandboxing: Detects zero-day attacks by emulating files safely.
AI-Powered Analysis: Uses artificial intelligence for deeper threat insights.
Threat Extraction: Delivers clean files while keeping originals for analysis.
Email and Web Scanning: Effective in sanitizing both emails and web downloads.
Phishing and Ransomware Protection: Shields against phishing attempts and ransomware.

What benefits should users expect from using Check Point SandBlast Network?

Comprehensive Security: Ensures thorough protection across infrastructures.
Minimal Disruption: Reduces the impact of malicious files and downloads on operations.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing security measures and tools.
Maintains Original Files: Keeps original files for further analysis, enhancing threat detection accuracy.

Check Point SandBlast Network is widely implemented in industries needing advanced threat prevention, such as financial, healthcare, and governmental sectors. These industries utilize its robust features to safeguard sensitive data, protect against sophisticated cyber threats, and ensure a secure digital environment for their operations.

Check Point Software Technologies

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection delivers simplicity, robust duplication, and extensive Office 365 support. It integrates seamlessly with EMC, offers competitive pricing, automated recovery, and a user-friendly interface. Users benefit from its comprehensive capabilities and automated processes.

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is distinguished by its high-end dashboard, security features, and immutability functionality. It supports hybrid and cloud environments, providing extensive storage and easy configuration. Stability and non-intrusive resource use enhance user satisfaction, while organizations primarily employ it for backing up Office 365 environments, Linux servers, and virtual machines. Offering data protection, disaster recovery, and business continuity, Veritas aids in long-term retention and offline backups, cutting dependency on on-premise resources and infrastructure. It supports migrations to SharePoint and centralizes backup operations efficiently.

What are the key features of Veritas Alta SaaS Protection?

Simplicity of Use: Designed to be intuitive, reducing learning time and operational costs.
Office 365 Coverage: Comprehensive module support enhances cloud-based collaborations.
Seamless Integration with EMC: Ensures compatibility and enhances capabilities.
Automated Recovery: Streamlines restoration ensuring quick data access.
Security Features: Strong security architecture safeguards sensitive data.
Immutability Functionality: Protects data against unauthorized changes or deletions.

What benefits should users consider in user reviews?

Stability: Consistent performance reduces downtime risks.
Ease of Administration: Simplifies management with minimal intervention.
Non-Intrusive Resource Use: Efficient operation reduces system load.
Comprehensive Capabilities: Wide-ranging features meet diverse business needs.

Veritas Alta SaaS Protection is employed across industries for secure data protection and recovery, particularly in sectors requiring reliable Office 365 integration, such as education and healthcare. Organizations in these sectors benefit from the solution's automated processes and centralized backup to maintain business continuity and data empowerment. Companies also utilize Veritas for efficient infrastructure transition, enabling them to migrate to cloud-based systems seamlessly.

Veritas

Sample Customers

Edenred, State Transport Leasing Company (STLC), Edel AG, Laurenty, Conseil Départemental du Val de Marne, Koch Media

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

April 2026

Free Report: Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point SandBlast Network vs. Veritas Alta SaaS Protection report.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.