Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Palo Alto Networks Panorama comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.2
Check Point Security Management boosts ROI by enhancing efficiency, reducing incidents, and consolidating operations for better financial outcomes.
Sentiment score
3.2
URL filtering and a single interface enhance efficiency, with quick benefits for large networks, despite high pricing challenges.
I have seen a strong ROI from using Check Point Security Management through unified policy management, reduced misconfigurations, and faster incident response.
Senior Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The time to resolve issues is very much better now with Check Point Security Management.
Network Cyber Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I have seen a hundred percent return on investment with Check Point Security Management.
IT admin at Tonboimaging india pvt ltd
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Check Point Security Management support is praised for expertise but criticized for delays and mixed issue resolution satisfaction.
Sentiment score
6.5
Palo Alto Networks Panorama support is responsive and knowledgeable, but some users experience delays, especially for complex issues.
When we face technical issues, they are ready to help us.
Inside Sales Manager at Digitaltrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
They are very helpful in each and every technical aspect and able to resolve complex issues within the timeline.
Server Security Analyst and Solution at Digitaltrack Solutions Pvt Ltd
Customer support for Check Point Security Management is excellent
Senior Network Engineer at Anthology
The technical support from Palo Alto is rated around nine out of ten.
Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The technical support by Palo Alto Networks is great because the response time is solid.
Application Support Administrator at Meridian Port Services
The tech support I've encountered has been good, prompt, and fast.
Senior Principal Solutions Architect, HPE Aruba Networking - Full Stack Platform Expert at Danoffice IT ApS
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Check Point Security Management is scalable, supporting organizational growth with centralized management and expansion through Quantum Maestro and Multi-Domain systems.
Sentiment score
7.3
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers adaptability and scalability for managing large networks, praised for flexibility despite some cost concerns.
It can be a multi-domain Security Management server and can manage large or segmented environments with multiple domains or customers.
Cybersecurity Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
When you upgrade multiple times, you leave many files that are useless. They are dated, so it's always better to create a new machine every few versions, for example, three or four major versions.
Security Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
The scalability of Check Point Security Management is excellent.
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack
Scalability is primarily enhanced by Strata Cloud Manager as it is much easier to scale in the cloud than in an on-premises installation.
Senior Principal Solutions Architect, HPE Aruba Networking - Full Stack Platform Expert at Danoffice IT ApS
Scalability depends on whether it's a hardware or virtual machine model.
IT Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Security Management is stable, especially with updates, despite minor issues like process restarts and occasional console crashes.
Sentiment score
7.5
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is praised for its stability, reliability under load, and performs well on cloud platforms like AWS.
Check Point Security Management is really stable, and I have not experienced any downtime or issues with reliability except for when we do upgrades.
Network Engineering and IS Access at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
The SmartConsole used to administrate the security management is somewhat unstable.
Network Cyber Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Check Point Security Management is stable and I have not experienced any downtime or reliability issues.
Network Security Engineer at Digitaltrack
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is very stable.
Consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Enhancements needed in usability, stability, integration, cost, log management, support, rule creation, cloud capabilities, documentation, and GUI for Check Point Security Management.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama needs improvements in updates, integration, user interface, pricing, analytics, security, and storage for efficiency.
When the logs are too heavy for the security management server, the CPU spike will be high, causing our management day-to-day activity to lag or become difficult.
Cybersecurity Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Refining reports and automation capabilities to make it more intuitive and scalable for diverse enterprise environments could improve Check Point Security Management.
IT Support at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Engaging role-based access control is essential; granular permissions for more flexible RBAC will allow the organization to delegate tasks.
Support at a security firm with 51-200 employees
In terms of operation, it is quite important that the staff managing the Panorama should be technically sound enough, and they should know exactly what they are doing.
Sr. Staff Network Engineer at Blackhawk Network India
The AI module should be on-premises, not in the cloud.
Senior Network Engineer at UPS
I would like to improve the dashboards on Palo Alto Networks Panorama, especially because I work in an environment where my managers are not really that technical.
Application Support Administrator at Meridian Port Services
 

Setup Cost

Check Point offers competitive, high-value security management with flexible, cost-effective licensing, despite higher initial pricing than some competitors.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is costly but offers robust, reliable features, with negotiable pricing and possible discounts for bulk purchases.
Since we are using it extensively, we get significant discounts during procurement.
Information Security at Synechron
Licensing is quite expensive.
Security Support Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We pay on a three-year base.
Network Cyber Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Virtual Panorama is well-priced and is sold every time there's a solution.
Senior Principal Solutions Architect, HPE Aruba Networking - Full Stack Platform Expert at Danoffice IT ApS
Commercially, compared to Fortinet, Palo Alto is more expensive.
Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Palo Alto Networks Panorama is expensive but provides good value for money.
Consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Security Management excels with centralized control, user-friendly interface, advanced security features, and efficient automation.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama centralizes firewall management, enhancing security with user-friendly interfaces, advanced reporting, and scalable integration features.
Check Point Security Management has positively impacted my organization by providing centralized control, allowing us to manage all security policies and gateways from a single console, reducing complexity and saving time.
Senior Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
After deploying Check Point Security Management, we improved our productivity by integrating all devices into a single console instead of managing separate log-ins for each branch's gateways, making our admin team's tasks easier.
Technique at Digitaltrack
The monitoring is exceptional as it provides consolidated logs, signals, and any alerts that come from the security gateway in real time.
Technical Specialist at VDA Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd.
I find this solution valuable for full monitoring, centralized control for reporting, and centralized management.
Senior Network Engineer at UPS
We do not currently have a SIEM solution, so we are heavily relying on the monitoring features of Palo Alto Networks Panorama to conduct our investigations and log reviews.
Application Support Administrator at Meridian Port Services
Palo Alto Networks Panorama has positively impacted our organization by allowing a couple of network engineers to use Panorama simultaneously with different templates or device groups, which helps us save time and reduce the complexity of the network.
Network Security Engineer at Cyberwell Solution
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (10th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (10th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (3rd)
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Firewall Security Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. Check Point Security Management is designed for Log Management and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Palo Alto Networks Panorama, on the other hand, focuses on Firewall Security Management, holds 7.7% mindshare, down 8.3% since last year.
Log Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Check Point Security Management0.6%
Wazuh7.5%
Splunk Enterprise Security6.8%
Other85.1%
Log Management
Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks Panorama7.7%
AlgoSec20.3%
Tufin Orchestration Suite19.8%
Other52.2%
Firewall Security Management
 

Featured Reviews

RL
TI at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Simplified threat detection and reduced policy deployment time
The standout features of Check Point Security Management are unified policy management, real-time visibility, and automation capabilities, making it a powerful tool for security management. Consistency across environments with Check Point Security Management helps me ensure that instead of maintaining separate rules for firewalls, cloud workloads, and data centers, we apply one unified policy that covers them all. This reduces misconfigurations and ensures compliance, proving to be a time-saver because rolling out a new rule or updating an existing one takes minutes, not hours, because it is propagated everywhere automatically. Automation is one of the most valuable aspects of Check Point Security Management, and it often does not get enough attention compared to headline features like unified policies or visibility. With policy automation, routine tasks such as rule creation, compliance checks, or policy updates can be automated, reducing human error and saving hours of manual work. Check Point Security Management has simplified administration in my organization because instead of juggling multiple consoles, everything is managed from a single pane of glass. This has reduced complexity and saved significant time for our IT team, improving our operational efficiency. For a policy update, I used to spend two or three hours across multiple consoles. Now, with unified management in Check Point Security Management, it takes thirty to forty minutes, resulting in about a seventy percent reduction in effort, greatly boosting productivity.
Richard Dombo - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Support Administrator at Meridian Port Services
Monitoring and managing multiple firewalls has become more efficient through centralized oversight and reliable logging
I would say that while Palo Alto Networks Panorama reporting capability is functional, it is not really intuitive. The presentation is not really as advanced as what an advanced solution would have provided. I would like to improve the dashboards on Palo Alto Networks Panorama, especially because I work in an environment where my managers are not really that technical. They do a great job leading us, but they do not have a technical background. If the dashboard could be improved to suit more executive use cases when it comes to reporting, that would be excellent. It is basic as far as I am concerned, and from an executive standpoint, it is not really that good. I would rate Palo Alto Networks Panorama as a product nine or 9.5 out of ten because there is always room for improvement, especially on the dashboard. I think if they could improve the dashboard, I would give them ten out of ten because from a technical standpoint, the dashboard is good, but at an executive level, it is not really that good. I usually struggle when doing presentations to my bosses because the dashboard and reporting from Palo Alto Networks Panorama are not as polished as they could be.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
17%
Security Firm
10%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business55
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise43
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business33
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise46
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
Based on my experience with Check Point Security Management, I do not see anything lacking. It is currently managing all the gateways, and we are able to achieve what we want from our perspective. ...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
I am using Check Point Security Management in our day-to-day operations to centrally manage all Check Point Security Gateways within my organization. All of these Check Point Security Gateways are ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
We did not purchase Palo Alto Networks Panorama through the Azure Marketplace. We purchased it directly through Palo Alto.
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
From a monitoring perspective, if we could improve on data retention and keep it for quite a long time, such as 90 days of data retention, that would be good for us to manage our CPU usage, as we c...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Panorama?
My main use case for Palo Alto Networks Panorama is to manage our firewalls. We have around 450 firewalls, and we manage them through Panorama. Configuration entry is the primary focus of our use.
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Wazuh, Splunk, Cribl and others in Log Management. Updated: February 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.