Top 10 Palo Alto Networks Panorama Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

91 reviews
97% willing to recommend

Top Palo Alto Networks Panorama Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Palo Alto Networks Panorama surpasses its competitors by offering centralized management across distributed networks, providing comprehensive visibility and streamlined policy management, which enhances security operations and improves response times.

Palo Alto Networks Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Palo Alto Networks, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

AlgoSec

4.5 out of 5

AlgoSec

4.5 out of 5

AlgoSec excels in network policy management with multi-vendor ecosystem integration. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers centralized firewall management with strong security features but less integration flexibility. AlgoSec appeals for cost-effectiveness, while Panorama is valued for performance despite higher costs.

Download AlgoSec vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

AlgoSec has a straightforward setup process with a low initial cost, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama presents a more complex setup with higher upfront expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

AlgoSec has a straightforward setup process with a low initial cost, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama presents a more complex setup with higher upfront expenses.

Tufin Orchestration Suite

4.0 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite

4.0 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in multi-vendor firewall rule management and compliance. In comparison, Panorama by Palo Alto Networks offers centralized management with ecosystem integration. Tufin provides pricing flexibility, while Panorama's advanced security features justify its higher initial cost.

Download Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite's setup cost is reportedly lower, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a higher initial investment requirement.

View comparison

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite's setup cost is reportedly lower, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a higher initial investment requirement.

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers ease of use and scalable security with cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama provides advanced policy management and automation suited for larger environments. Tech buyers may choose Fortinet for flexibility or Panorama for comprehensive security and enterprise functionality.

Download Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers a lower initial setup cost, providing a cost-effective entry, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a higher upfront investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities and comprehensive network management features.

View comparison

Pricing

FireMon Security Manager

4.1 out of 5

FireMon Security Manager

4.1 out of 5

FireMon Security Manager is ideal for robust firewall rule management and policy visibility, excelling in automation. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers centralized management with extensive integration, making it suitable for large deployments needing comprehensive security features.

Download FireMon Security Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

FireMon Security Manager has a more affordable setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Panorama, which has a higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

FireMon Security Manager has a more affordable setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Panorama, which has a higher initial expense.

Skybox Security Suite

3.8 out of 5

Skybox Security Suite

3.8 out of 5

Skybox Security Suite offers advanced network path analysis and scalability for large enterprises. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama provides centralized firewall management with user-friendly policy deployment. While Skybox focuses on complex infrastructures, Panorama emphasizes integrated management and efficient policy execution.

Download Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs. Skybox Security Suite Report

Pricing

Skybox Security Suite has a lower setup cost with easy deployment, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama involves a higher initial investment due to advanced features and comprehensive management capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS Firewall Manager

3.9 out of 5

AWS Firewall Manager

3.9 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers extensive security management with ease of integration across firewalls; a tech buyer prioritizing automation and multi-location management may prefer it. In comparison, AWS Firewall Manager provides scalable automation and customization, appealing to those deeply integrated into AWS's ecosystem.

Download AWS Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a higher setup cost, while AWS Firewall Manager offers a more economical setup, attracting cost-conscious users.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Panorama has a higher setup cost, while AWS Firewall Manager offers a more economical setup, attracting cost-conscious users.

Azure Firewall Manager

4.3 out of 5

Azure Firewall Manager

4.3 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers comprehensive security controls and flexibility, suiting those prioritizing robust management. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager excels in scalability and integration with Azure services, appealing to cloud-focused strategies with potential cost efficiency for Microsoft ecosystem users.

Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Panorama typically involves higher setup costs due to its robust functionalities, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup option that appeals to cost-conscious users seeking essential firewall management.

View comparison

Pricing

ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer

4.2 out of 5

ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer

4.2 out of 5

ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer attracts tech buyers with affordable pricing and efficient customer support, making it ideal for straightforward deployment. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama appeals for its advanced features and centralized management, providing value in complex environments despite higher setup costs.

Download ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer offers a lower setup cost compared to Palo Alto Networks Panorama, making it a more budget-friendly option. In contrast, Panorama provides a robust feature set, justifying its higher initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiPortal

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiPortal

4.0 out of 5

Fortinet FortiPortal emphasizes user-friendly customization with efficient pricing and support. In comparison, Palo Alto Networks Panorama targets deeper security management and in-depth technical deployment. Fortinet suits cost-conscious buyers seeking ease of use, while Palo Alto appeals to those requiring advanced features and long-term ROI.

Download Fortinet FortiPortal vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiPortal has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama may require more extensive upfront investment. FortiPortal offers a simpler pricing model compared to the comprehensive but potentially higher setup costs of Panorama.

View comparison

Pricing

Cisco Security Cloud Control

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Security Cloud Control

4.1 out of 5

Panorama excels in centralized management and visibility over multiple firewalls, enhancing security operations. In comparison, Cisco Security Cloud Control offers robust automation for swift threat responses, ideal for environments needing quick mitigation. Both solutions provide extensive features with high pricing noted.

Download Cisco Security Cloud Control vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Panorama involves a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Security Cloud Control offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Firewall Security Management

Vulnerability Management

Microsoft Security Suite