Checkmarx One vs Kondukto [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Checkmarx and Invicti are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while Invicti is ranked #51. Checkmarx holds a 8.1% mindshare in SAST, compared to Invicti’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Invicti users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

30,538 Views
17,407 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Kondukto [EOL]

Read 1 Kondukto [EOL] review

1,531 Views
1,148 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Kondukto [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2026

Checkmarx One and Kondukto are competing products in the application security domain. Checkmarx One takes the lead in user satisfaction, pricing, and support, while Kondukto excels in feature set, compensating its cost with robust capabilities.

Features:Checkmarx One is known for its comprehensive static application security testing, integration capabilities, and solid basic features. Kondukto offers advanced risk assessment tools, seamless orchestration features, and superior risk management, making it a stronger option for complex security needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Checkmarx One provides a streamlined deployment process and effective customer support with rapid setup and comprehensive assistance. Kondukto offers a sophisticated deployment model with in-depth customer service, focusing on flexibility and advanced troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI:Checkmarx One tends to have a lower initial setup cost, emphasizing cost-effectiveness with a favorable ROI for companies needing solid features. Kondukto involves a higher setup cost but justifies this with a more substantial ROI through its advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

2nd

Ranking in DevSecOps

3rd

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Vulnerability Management (12th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (5th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (9th), AI Security (3rd)

Kondukto [EOL]

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

51st

Ranking in DevSecOps

19th

Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 8.1%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kondukto [EOL] is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	8.1%
Kondukto	0.7%
Other	91.2%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

Mohamed Abdel-Hassanein

Co-Founder and Business Development at TeCrypt

Unified dashboard has simplified managing multiple scanners and improved vulnerability remediation

The best feature and biggest benefit of the product is the ability to manage different scanners from a single dashboard. Regarding analytics capability, Kondukto provides actionable insights into security needs because it performs all the work on the customer's behalf. It checks findings and vulnerabilities from different scanners, confirms that all findings are matched together, and makes it clear and confident that the final finding is truly a vulnerability requiring action. Regarding automation features, Kondukto is fully automated and fully integrated with a plug and play approach. In terms of integration with DevOps pipelines, the benefit is that Kondukto itself is not an integration tool. The DAST tool is integrated, and I can manage the scanner. The tool itself, whether it is DAST or SAST, will be integrated with DevOps and other tools like notification tools, SIEM, and SOC. The scanner tool itself will be managed under Kondukto, but Kondukto does not provide integration. There is no need because the scanner itself will integrate with other tools.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."

"The best features Checkmarx One offers, in my opinion, are that it is easy to use, and there is not much deep diving into this."

"Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle."

"Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products to build a safe and stable application when it comes to inviting customers to use your online services."

"The biggest advantage we have seen is that we're able to develop and deliver secure solutions in a faster time."

"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."

"Vulnerability details is valuable."

"By using the automated testing in Checkmarx One, we have saved around one or two days in a full week of our team because we have a lot of code to do with seven markets."

More Checkmarx One pros

"Kondukto helps consolidate security findings by correlating them to minimize false positives and giving customers a complete and clear vision of high critical findings in an easy way."

Cons

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."

"The purchase of this solution was a mistake. I would advise others to deploy the solution and to test all of the functionality before buying and do not trust the marketing from Checkmarx."

"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it (if more then ~ 30 mb zip file provided - scan is crashes or takes a lot of time)."

"When we first ran it on a big project, there wasn't enough memory on the computer. It originally ran with eight gigabytes, and now it runs with 32. The software stopped at some point, and while I don't think it said it ran out of memory, it just said "stopped" and something else. We had to go to the logs and send them to the integrator, and eventually, they found a memory issue in the logs and recommended increasing the memory. We doubled it once, and it didn't seem enough. We doubled it again, and it helped."

"The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers."

"The lack of ability to review compiled source code. It would then be able to compete with other scanning tools, such as Veracode."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The primary concerns I have are that it is somewhat expensive, support would rate as seven, and there were licensing activation issues."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"The solution is costly."

"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is the biggest difference between Veracode and Checkmarx?

According to my experience of using both the tools in different organizations Veracode is a Cloud-native, managed AppSec platform with strong focus on ease of use, it is SaaS delivery, and provide...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 22% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Snyk vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

DefectDojo vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 19% of the time

SonarQube vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

Data Theorem API Secure vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Harness vs Kondukto [EOL]

Compared 1% of the time

More Kondukto [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

October 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Kondukto [EOL] product report

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

Kondukto offers robust solutions designed for advanced security in software development. It centralizes vulnerability management, enhancing efficiency for teams and improving the security posture across projects.

As a comprehensive platform, Kondukto streamlines vulnerability management by integrating with existing development tools to automate and simplify processes. It informs users promptly about potential security threats, enabling swift risk mitigation. Kondukto caters to enterprises by providing essential insights and high adaptability in software environments.

What are the core features of Kondukto?

Integration Compatibility: Seamlessly aligns with popular development tools, ensuring a smooth workflow.
Automation Capabilities: Reduces manual effort by automating repetitive tasks related to security checks.
Risk Assessment: Offers detailed reports on vulnerabilities, assisting in prioritizing security fixes.
Custom Alerts: Configurable notifications to keep teams informed about significant security developments.

Why consider Kondukto?

Efficiency Boost: Streamlined processes lead to faster threat identification and resolution.
Enhanced Security: Continuous monitoring maintains a high level of security assurance.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprises with expanding needs.

Kondukto is utilized in industries like finance and healthcare, where data protection is crucial. Its implementation focuses on integrating within existing ecosystems to strengthen security protocols without disrupting workflow. By providing relevant insights, it aids businesses in maintaining compliance and managing risk effectively.

Invicti

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Trendyol, Ödeal

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors, best DevSecOps vendors, and best Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.