Checkmarx One vs ReShaper comparison

Checkmarx and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. Checkmarx is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while JetBrains is ranked #13. Checkmarx holds a 9.6% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

Checkmarx One

Read 81 Checkmarx One reviews

22,245 Views
2,225 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ReShaper

Read 2 ReShaper reviews

510 Views
510 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

ReShaper

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Checkmarx One and ReShaper are competing products in software development and security management. Checkmarx One has an advantage in comprehensive security features, while ReShaper offers enhanced code refactoring capabilities.

Features: Checkmarx One provides robust application security testing tools, including static and interactive testing, crucial for secure software development lifecycles. ReShaper focuses on powerful code analysis and refactoring tools to streamline the coding process. The main difference is Checkmarx One’s focus on security compared to ReShaper's on code optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers flexible deployment options like SaaS, on-premises, and hybrid models, along with extensive customer support. ReShaper is primarily a desktop application focusing on easy integration with development environments and straightforward installation processes.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One offers a competitive pricing model with a focus on long-term ROI through enhanced security. ReShaper presents a different financial model with a lower initial cost, emphasizing gains through improved developer efficiency and faster coding cycles.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Container Security (15th), API Security (4th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (1st)

ReShaper

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 9.6%, down from 18.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReShaper is 2.4%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Checkmarx One	9.6%
ReShaper	2.4%
Other	88.0%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Shahzad Shahzad

Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution

Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance

Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.

Read full review

reviewer937347

Sr. Test Engineering Manager - Embedded Linux SW / RF at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Beneficial real-time scanning, reliable, and overall good processing

ReShaper is a static code analysis tool The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system. ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."

"The solution has good performance, it is able to compute in 10 to 15 minutes."

"In summary, this is a good application that you can use to scan every code language."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"The most valuable feature is the application tracking reporting."

"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."

"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."

"Checkmarx is probably one of the best static code analyzers available in the market at this point."

More Checkmarx One pros

"It comes with many features and supports almost all of the coding languages available."

"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system."

"Once you get used to working with the ReShaper, you can't get enough of it."

"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time, and ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, with a decent system."

Cons

"Checkmarx needs to improve the false positives and provide more accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities. It misses important vulnerabilities."

"The stability of Checkmarx could improve. We're having issues with it, and the scan reliability is sometimes impacted so we sometimes have to restart the services to allow scans out of the queue."

"This product requires you to create your own rulesets. You have to do a lot of customization."

"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."

"Creating and editing custom rules in Checkmarx is difficult because the license for the editor comes at an additional cost, and there is a steep learning curve."

"Presently they support micro-services, but the supporting methodology of the micro-services is not good enough at the moment."

"There are some downtimes when Checkmarx One is being upgraded to the latest version or some improvement is there."

"Unfortunately, Checkmarx doesn't do any automated backups which is quite inconvenient."

More Checkmarx One cons

"When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times."

"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU."

"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU. The processing is taking too many CPU resources which causes the system to slow down."

"When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"As far as I know, the licensing isn't very cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmarx?

One way Checkmarx One could be improved is if it could automatically run scans every month after implementation. If it is possible to set it in the SAST portal to scan the repositories automaticall...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Checkmarx One

Compared 37% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Checkmarx One

Compared 2% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Whole Tomato Visual Assist vs ReShaper

Compared 35% of the time

Veracode vs ReShaper

Compared 30% of the time

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs ReShaper

Compared 22% of the time

Klocwork vs ReShaper

Compared 13% of the time

More ReShaper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

May 2026

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

April 2026

Download ReShaper product report

Overview

Checkmarx One delivers robust security through seamless integration with SCM and CI/CD tools, ensuring reliable SAST and SCA. Primarily used by organizations for vulnerability detection, it supports cloud and on-premises deployment to enhance secure coding practices.

Checkmarx One provides organizations with comprehensive tools for secure software development, integrating effectively with CI/CD pipelines to scan thousands of applications. Its capabilities extend to identifying vulnerabilities in both code bases and third-party software. Enhancing workflow by supporting SCM solutions, it assists in maintaining secure coding standards and compliance. While excelling in various areas, it requires improvements in scan speed, reduction of false positives, and broader platform integration, particularly for COBOL and Swift. Its pricing model is noted as high, and demand exists for better tutorials and documentation.

What are the key features of Checkmarx One?

Comprehensive Integration: Seamlessly connects with SCM, CI/CD tools to streamline security workflows.
Accurate SAST and SCA: Precisely identifies vulnerabilities down to the exact line of code.
Custom Rules Configuration: Allows tailored security measures to match specific needs.
Quick Scanning: Provides fast analysis to speed up the development process.
Automated Code Remediation: Helps in efficiently fixing code vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Security: Enhances code safety, reducing vulnerabilities efficiently.
Effective False Positivity Management: Optimizes time spent on genuine issues.
Enhanced Development Processes: Integrates smoothly to boost secure coding initiatives.
Comprehensive Language Support: Facilitates scanning in multiple programming languages, accommodating diverse needs.

Industries implement Checkmarx One for secure coding compliance and vulnerability management across varying environments, choosing between cloud and on-premises deployment based on requirements. Its extensive language support and integration with DevSecOps practices make it a popular choice for organizations aiming to enhance software security.

Checkmarx

ReShaper is designed to streamline code refactoring, optimize workflows, and enhance productivity for developers. It provides a suite of integrated tools that facilitate seamless code editing and comprehension.

ReShaper caters to development teams seeking efficient code management. Its robust features support refactoring, navigation, and code analysis. Built to enhance efficiency, ReShaper supports multiple programming languages, offering vital solutions tailored for modern development environments. Its tools reduce manual effort, fostering streamlined coding practices and improved software quality. Suitable for both small teams and large enterprises, ReShaper adapts to different project needs.

What are the key features of ReShaper?

Code Analysis: Identifies issues and suggests improvements.
Refactoring: Streamlines code restructuring to uphold quality.
Navigation: Quick access to code elements improves efficiency.
Code Editing: Offers comprehensive coding assistance.
Integration: Seamless support with popular IDEs enhances user experience.

What are the benefits or ROI from using ReShaper?

Improved Code Quality: Ensures high standards and mitigates errors.
Increased Productivity: Reduces development time through automated processes.
Efficient Workflow: Enhances team collaboration with integrated tools.
Cost-Effective: Reduces manual effort, bringing value to development initiatives.

In industries like software development and technology, ReShaper is used to elevate coding standards and optimize project timelines. Its implementation in sectors demanding high-quality coding results in reduced errors and improved software delivery times, contributing to a more reliable and efficient development process.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper

April 2026

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. ReShaper report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.