Checkmarx One vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Checkmarx and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Checkmarx is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tenable is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.1. Checkmarx holds a 0.9% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Checkmarx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Checkmarx One and Tenable Vulnerability Management are key players in the vulnerability scanning and management market. Checkmarx One holds the advantage in advanced code scanning capabilities and remediation guidance, while Tenable's strength lies in its broader vulnerability management tools and integration capabilities.

Features: Checkmarx One offers advanced code scanning without code compilation, supporting various languages and providing comprehensive analysis tools. It identifies vulnerabilities and offers remediation guidance and syntax correction, which helps developers enhance secure coding skills. Tenable Vulnerability Management provides robust vulnerability scanning with strong integration capabilities with third-party solutions, making it competitive in managing a wide range of vulnerabilities.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One needs to address false positives, expand language support, and develop a more flexible and affordable licensing model. Tenable Vulnerability Management could benefit from better integration, intuitive dashboards, and expanded reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One supports multiple deployment options, including on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud, allowing flexibility for various infrastructures. While its technical support is positive, response times can be slow. Tenable Vulnerability Management offers diverse deployment options favoring public cloud availability, with customer service praised for promptness and knowledge, though improvements in response time and detailed support could enhance the experience.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is perceived as expensive due to its complex licensing model, but it promises a good ROI by reducing vulnerabilities early in development, minimizing troubleshooting costs. Tenable Vulnerability Management's pricing is seen as high, especially for SMBs, but offers reasonable ROI through comprehensive security coverage, with both needing more transparent and flexible pricing structures.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 868,787 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmarx One is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 4.6%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tenable Vulnerability Management	4.6%
Zafran Security	1.1%
Checkmarx One	0.9%
Other	93.4%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Syed Hasan

Specialist Leader at Deloitte

Partner experiences excellent technical support and seamless initial setup

In my opinion, if we are able to extract or show the report, and because everything is going towards agent tech and GenAI, it would be beneficial if it could get integrated with our code base and do the fix automatically. It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from. This would be really helpful.

Read full review

Chethan Gowda

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers

Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Checkmarx offers many valuable features, including Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Infrastructure as Code (IAC), Supply Chain Security, and API Security."

"Scan reviews can occur during the development lifecycle."

"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."

"It allows for SAST scanning of uncompiled code. Further, it natively integrates with all key repos formats (Git, TFS, SVN, Perforce, etc)."

"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."

"It is a stable product."

"The tool's valuable features include integrating GPT and Copilot. Additionally, the UI web representation is very user-friendly, making navigation easy. GPT has made several improvements to my security code."

"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."

More Checkmarx One pros

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."

"They are on a good trajectory as a company and investing in R&D in the right ways."

"The initial setup is not complex."

"Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting."

"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."

"You can customize each point in new scans."

"It has greatly impacted us by providing asset visibility."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Checkmarx needs improvement in its Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and API security features."

"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."

"The product's reporting feature could be better. The feature works well for developers, but reports generated to be shared with external parties are poor, it lacks the details one gets when viewing the results directly from the Checkmarx One platform."

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it."

"We can run only one project at a time."

"Meta data is always needed."

"I would like to see the tool’s pricing improved."

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The stability has room for improvement."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management could be improved with an increased number of dashboards and MSSP integration."

"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."

"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."

"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."

"Users get confused between VPR and CVSS ratings."

"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."

"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is costly."

"The solution's price is high and you pay based on the number of users."

"It's relatively expensive."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"We have purchased an annual license to use this solution. The price is reasonable."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."

"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	38

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...

See all answers

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I don't think I have any additional features to add for improvement, as Tenable Vulnerability Management does a prett...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 34% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 14% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

HackerOne vs Zafran Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Compared 44% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 12% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Zafran Security

September 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One

September 2025

Download Checkmarx One product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

September 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

September 2025

Free Report: Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmarx One vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.