Cisco Intersight vs HPE Eucalyptus [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Cisco Intersight

Read 23 Cisco Intersight reviews

8,366 Views
2,510 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]

Read 2 HPE Eucalyptus [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

Cisco Intersight

HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Intersight and HPE Eucalyptus [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Intersight

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th)

HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer2922069

Software Developer

Centralized monitoring has improved visibility and standardizes profiles across multiple sites

One area where Cisco Intersight could be improved is making the interface and troubleshooting workflows more intuitive, especially for users who do not work with the platform every day. Sometimes finding the exact information needed or understanding certain alerts can require navigating to multiple locations. I would also appreciate more actionable recommendations alongside alerts rather than just identifying an issue and leaving the next step entirely to me. Overall, the functionality is strong, but improving usability and making troubleshooting more straightforward would enhance the everyday experience. Apart from usability, Cisco Intersight could benefit from smoother integration with third-party monitoring and IT management tools. Having alerts, performance data, and infrastructure information flow more seamlessly between platforms would reduce the need to switch between different systems. Performance-wise, keeping dashboards responsive when managing larger environments would also be important. I would also like to see more practical documentation, particularly step-by-step troubleshooting guides and real-world examples for automation workflows. These improvements would make the platform more accessible and efficient for everyday operations for new and existing users. Smoother integration with third-party monitoring and IT management tools would allow alerts, performance data, and infrastructure information to flow more seamlessly between platforms. These improvements, including usability enhancements, would make the platform more accessible and efficient for new and existing users.

Read full review

HiranthaWijayawardena

Manager Global Cloud Strategy & Lean IT at Mubasher

Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version

The customization should be improved. We should be able to diversify the machine for AWS. When we get involved with that right now, it becomes very bad. Some areas of configuration didn't work for us. The solution should offer more speed and should be able to stabilize the database environment. We've tried to do this, but it hasn't been solid. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. If we want to do an interceptor, what we need is a really high level of TT programming or a specific configuration to be able to scale it out. It works to some extent, but it's not strong. When it does not implement in our center we have to go and manually fix it. The solution should be able to better scale the number of users, especially when you're using the cloud. The solution should extend better into the Microsoft community and companies should be able to run it on Azure Cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our organization uses Cisco Intersight since it helps manage our physical infrastructure."

"Cisco Intersight has valuable features for workflow automation and inventory administration."

"Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up."

"This solution has provided time savings and required fewer people to operate this tool."

"The most valuable features I find in Cisco Intersight include the fact that it's a cloud-managed solution, which automates the process when a part on the server goes faulty, for example, if you have a module that goes faulty, automatically a TAC case opens at the Cisco level, and everything is automated, meaning there's no need to check for this."

"It offers visibility and optimization of workloads, which are very important features for a company."

"Cisco Intersight has positively impacted my organization by making it a lot quicker to diagnose or foresee problems that might be coming up, and since it is a technology that is at the heart of our infrastructure, it helps us feel safe."

"The product has good integration."

More Cisco Intersight pros

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."

"Eucalyptus should see good momentum if AWS propagates the theory of Hybrid cloud as the APIs in Eucalyptus are greatly compatible with AWS and serves as a great private cloud option for enterprises."

Cons

"I believe Cisco Intersight's licensing is quite expensive for a public healthcare environment, and I would like to see lower prices for us."

"Technical support from Cisco has been mixed. For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX."

"There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment."

"Cisco Intersight should allow for more automation capabilities and be more open."

"More products should be made compatible with iWORK, including more software and hardware."

"I do not have notes for improvement."

"Cisco Intersight's license cost is very high compared to AWS and Azure solutions, which have lower initiation costs. The high initial cost is a significant concern."

"In the future, the solution needs to plan on an extension to cover a broader range of objects since, at present, there are some Cisco devices within the range of Intersight UCS that it can't manage."

More Cisco Intersight cons

"The customization should be improved."

"Customer Service: Requires improvement Technical Support: Good but could have been beeter"

"When we get involved with that right now, it becomes very bad."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco Intersight has competitive pricing. On a scale of one to five, my rating for its pricing is four."

"Cisco Intersight is not cheap, but it's not the most expensive product either."

"You can get a free license for monitoring but need to purchase a license if you need extra control."

"The product is cost-effective."

"It's just the standard licensing cost. There are no additional fees."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco Intersight?

Regarding improvements for Cisco Intersight, I would say more third-party integration is needed. At the moment it does have a basic integration of Pure Storage, so I can add my Pure Storage if I ha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Intersight?

My main use case for Cisco Intersight is to register our Cisco UCS servers and apply profiles to our servers with configurations, firmware deployment automatically, and install the operating system...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cisco Intersight?

I would rate Cisco Intersight a nine out of ten. I give it a nine because personally, I think it is one of the best management tools ever. I have worked before with different server vendors and dif...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco UCS Manager vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 39% of the time

Cisco UCS Director vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Intersight

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Intersight Competitors

VMware vSphere vs HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]

Compared 30% of the time

CloudCheckr vs HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]

Compared 18% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

CloudStack vs HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

More HPE Eucalyptus [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Intersight

November 2026

Download Cisco Intersight product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2026

Download HPE Eucalyptus [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Intersight

Eucalyptus, HP Eucalyptus

Overview

Cisco Intersight delivers advanced data center management with cloud integration, remote server scaling, and predictive analytics, promoting efficient infrastructure management. It supports hybrid environments and is suitable for scaling across enterprises.

Cisco Intersight offers a comprehensive view of data centers with seamless cloud platform integration, enhancing manageability across environments. It is known for workflow automation, inventory management, and predictive analysis, allowing users to optimize workloads. Users leverage its scalability and ease of use, with features that aid in remote management and integration with both Cisco and non-Cisco products. However, improvements are needed in usability, automation, and third-party tool integration, especially for on-premises and hybrid cloud management. Users often face challenges with firmware management and transitioning from UCS Manager. Desired enhancements include better software compatibility, third-party integrations, expanded microservices support, enhanced AI features, and more automation capabilities, addressing setup complexity, support, and high maintenance costs.

What are the main features of Cisco Intersight?

Data Center Management: Provides insights into data centers with comprehensive monitoring.
Cloud Integration: Enables integration with cloud platforms for enhanced workflows.
Remote Management: Facilitates remote management of data center environments.
Predictive Analytics: Offers analysis tools for workload optimization and planning.
Scalability: Capable of scaling with enterprise infrastructure needs.

What are the expected benefits of using Cisco Intersight?

Improved Infrastructure Management: Offers tools for efficient management across environments.
Enhanced Workflow Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automation capabilities.
Cost-Effective Operations: Promotes efficiency and reduces maintenance costs.
Comprehensive Integration: Supports seamless integration with diverse platforms and technologies.
Performance Optimization: Utilizes predictive analytics for optimizing system performance.

In industries where data center management and integration are critical, such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Cisco Intersight is used to monitor and manage infrastructure across multiple sites. Its capability to combine platforms like HyperFlex and VMware allows organizations to maintain hardware status effectively, supporting both on-premises and cloud environments for efficient service delivery.

Cisco

HP Eucalyptus helps customers grow revenue and stay ahead of competition by enabling developers to get the IT resources they need in seconds, not days. Its unique AWS compatibility ensures applications are easily deployed in private, public or hybrid cloud environments.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

EXMAR, RapidScale

Mosaik Solutions, Nava Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.