No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudCheckr vs HPE Eucalyptus [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (9th), Cloud Cost Management (12th), Managed Cloud Services (5th), AI Observability (23rd)
HPE Eucalyptus [EOL]
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AbhishekGupta2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work
The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.
HW
Manager Global Cloud Strategy & Lean IT at Mubasher
Good interface, and an easy initial setup with good community support on the free version
The customization should be improved. We should be able to diversify the machine for AWS. When we get involved with that right now, it becomes very bad. Some areas of configuration didn't work for us. The solution should offer more speed and should be able to stabilize the database environment. We've tried to do this, but it hasn't been solid. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. If we want to do an interceptor, what we need is a really high level of TT programming or a specific configuration to be able to scale it out. It works to some extent, but it's not strong. When it does not implement in our center we have to go and manually fix it. The solution should be able to better scale the number of users, especially when you're using the cloud. The solution should extend better into the Microsoft community and companies should be able to run it on Azure Cloud.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CloudCheckr has impacted my organization positively by making things easier and saving time, approximately three hours a week."
"If you are on AWS, you don't need to even think about it, just go ahead with using the solution because there's no better tool in that segment than CloudCheckr CMx High Security."
"I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment."
"CloudCheckr offers excellent features, with the ease of scale through cloud operations being the most valuable to us because we need to be able to transition through those well and with the least amount of resistance as possible."
"The billing feature is great, it is easy to set up, the solution is mostly stable, the scalability is great, and it offers excellent technical support."
"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."
"The only way I have to see the costs is via CloudCheckr."
"CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the interface on the console."
"Eucalyptus should see good momentum if AWS propagates the theory of Hybrid cloud as the APIs in Eucalyptus are greatly compatible with AWS and serves as a great private cloud option for enterprises."
 

Cons

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."
"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration."
"The interface could be improved because it is too dense and overloaded with too many charts and too much information on each screen."
"The solution must improve its user interface."
"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."
"I was not satisfied with the customer support from CloudCheckr."
"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."
"Some limitations are faced sometimes depending on the dependency, service availability, or any service limitation."
"When we get involved with that right now, it becomes very bad."
"Customer Service: Requires improvement Technical Support: Good but could have been beeter"
"The customization should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is on par with other providers."
"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."
"The solution is reasonably priced."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Construction Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?
Some limitations are faced sometimes depending on the dependency, service availability, or any service limitation. I think this is the negative impact. I would love to know about future updates and...
What is your primary use case for CloudCheckr ?
We perform many services and professional services for our clients using CloudCheckr. Professional services include one-time scope locked services, where we deploy the infrastructure or whatever th...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP
Eucalyptus, HP Eucalyptus
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility
Mosaik Solutions, Nava Solutions
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.