No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs Surfshark One comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco IOS SSL VPN
Ranking in SSL VPN
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (14th)
Surfshark One
Ranking in SSL VPN
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the SSL VPN category, the mindshare of Cisco IOS SSL VPN is 10.3%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Surfshark One is 3.3%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SSL VPN Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cisco IOS SSL VPN10.3%
Surfshark One3.3%
Other86.4%
SSL VPN
 

Featured Reviews

VM
student at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Ease and speed of connectivity impress and recommend
I have not found any areas that could be improved so far. I am not sure how Cisco IOS SSL VPN can continue their improvements for the future, but I think it is a great product. To stay on top, they probably need updates to this product. I do not know what kind of improvements these updates are offering. It is a great product so far.
WK
Head of Information Security at K2 Baseline Sdn Bhd
Offers ease of use and has an initial setup phase that is straightforward
The tool's performance is quite good till now, so I have no complaints about it. The tool still blocks IP addresses for certain websites, making it an area of concern that requires improvements. This may be because some websites don't accept VPN connections from non-VPN servers, so sometimes, users are blocked from accessing certain sites.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The split panel functionality is much better in the Cisco IOS SSL VPN than in the Aruba VPN."
"It is stable."
"Cisco is a well known brand which provides good service and many people have familiarity with it, including businesses."
"Cisco certainly has a really strong support team."
"The most valuable features are that it's reliable, convenient, and easy. It always works if configured well."
"It's a very stable solution and I'd say it works perfectly."
"We provide remote access solutions, internet access, and Voice over IP for our customers, as well as IT operational support."
"It is very effective and I am satisfied with how it works and with its performance."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"It did what I needed it to do. It was easy to use."
 

Cons

"I believe Cisco could support easier configuration and having tools that allow for easier management and configuration, as Linksys switches are a little bit easier to manage and set up compared to Cisco switches."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product’s dashboard is not good enough."
"The product costs a lot of money."
"The configuration is critical and complex."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN should improve its pricing."
"I can't say that I would recommend this solution at this time because the support for the Token software is expiring soon and Cisco IOS SSL VPN would have to be upgraded to another solution similar to Token."
"In terms of what needs improvement, it should have better integration. Although, it might have already been taken care of."
"There is room for improvement in stability."
"The tool still blocks IP addresses for certain websites, making it an area of concern that requires improvements."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With Cisco, there is a free solution or a licensed version of the solution with a set of endpoint services."
"It stands as the priciest solution available in the market."
"The licensing fee is expensive."
"Price flexibility could be improved in comparison to other vendors."
"The pricing of the solution is reasonable"
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN is more expensive than the Aruba VPN, but it is worth the money."
"It is an expensive product."
"I would say it is a bit expensive, but I think it is worth the price."
"There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges attached to the product. The product is reasonably priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL VPN solutions are best for your needs.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise26
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
I have not found any areas that could be improved so far. I am not sure how Cisco IOS SSL VPN can continue their improvements for the future, but I think it is a great product. To stay on top, they...
What is your primary use case for Cisco IOS SSL VPN?
Currently, I use Cisco IOS SSL VPN to VPN in, but not with high frequency. We use Cisco IOS SSL VPN as our VPN client to connect to our network. This is for health.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Cisco SSL VPN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MST Systems
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. Surfshark One and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.