No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cisco Network Assurance Engine [EOL] vs Ekahau AI Pro comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 7, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Network Assurance Eng...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ekahau AI Pro
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Network Modeling and Simulation (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2352375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Helps to easily detect and resolve issues like security threats, bandwidth usage concerns, and performance bottlenecks
I use Cisco Network Assurance Engine to ensure the security, compliance, and smooth operation of my network infrastructure. With this tool, I can easily detect and resolve issues like security threats, bandwidth usage concerns, and performance bottlenecks across my hundreds of PCs and other ICT…
ALEXANDRE VIANNA - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Redeswirelessbrasil
Good optimization capabilities, automatic network planning tool and saves time
Ekahau needs to enhance the view of materials and make some adjustments to the reports. Currently, it's possible to make changes to the Word report using Python, but it could be improved. For example, when I create an AP on a survey report, information like the cable view, distance, and support assessments could be enhanced. Only one comment about Ekahau Optimizer. It needs improvement. I tried to upload site products, and for five products, I needed to involve Ekahau's supply chain. When I try to solve that, it's not possible. For example, I uploaded one product for a large bank, and the optimizer didn't finish. I needed to involve Ekahau support, and they sent me the file two or three days after I opened the case.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We install this solution for our clients who like the solution and their experience with it."
"Try Cisco Network Assurance Engine out, as it is really good."
"It is easy to set up."
"Any product that Cisco provides will give the user more visibility into their connectivity and network, thus protecting their environment."
"The standout feature of Cisco Network Assurance Engine is its ability to proactively detect and prevent network issues before they occur."
"It is scalable from the beginning. It is a product that you can scale upwards whenever you want."
"In a short amount of time, you can see what went wrong on a screen in a report."
"Channel planning, access points' auto position, and the size of the spectrum are valuable to me."
"The troubleshooting tools are the most valuable feature of the solution."
"I would highly recommend going to the Ekahau training class."
"Ekahau Site Survey is user-friendly."
"Ekahau really listens to their customers and regularly takes the advice of real users, categorizes these points, and adds them in product version releases."
"I like Ekahau's interface and the reports it can generate."
"I have found the most valuable feature is the RF interference and integration capabilities."
"Ekahau Site Survey is an easy and accurate solution."
 

Cons

"Because what they have right now is not good enough, and good enough will not work anymore."
"At the beginning, the setup was complex."
"The scalability is one of the biggest failures of the solution."
"To enhance Cisco Network Assurance Engine, simplifying its interface and making it more user-friendly would be beneficial."
"It needs authentication beyond just local and LDAP. It should also have TACACS+ and RADIUS."
"We were actually able to recover some access points in some areas that were over saturated. So I I can leave at least two areas where we probably had twice as many access points as we needed to. So we actually redesigned it and pulled some of those access points where I don't know that there was any proper planning done when they were initially deployed. It was before my time, but it just seemed way over saturated, and they were all beaten on each other. So Site wasn't helping. It was probably hurting, and we saved equipment that we could then deploy somewhere else. This can be improved."
"I wish there were a competitor to keep Ekahau Site Survey's pricing in line, but there's none."
"I wish the solution was better at making different survey modes."
"The new Sidekick is going to support Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E."
"It would be better if it provided clear visibility. It would be better if it accommodated large physical sites like a warehouse with a ceiling height of more than twelve to fifteen feet. In such situations, we were unable to provide better coverage."
"This tool needs too many of the resources (RAM) of your PC."
"I wish we could have an "offline" version of Ekahau in order to give the customer some kind of interactive report where he could find all the measured values."
"Ekahau could be improved by adding three-dimensional modeling, as we currently cannot view APIs in a three-dimensional perspective."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"9,000 Euro per year."
"The pricing is quite expensive. Not all companies can afford it"
"We pay $6,000 yearly for the licensing, but each piece of hardware, the Ekahau Sidekick, is $5,000."
"Ekahau Site Survey is a really expensive solution."
"The pricing is high."
"Since we are an academic institute, we get better prices and discounts from Cisco, but not Ekahau."
"The pricing could be lower because the Huawei radial planning is free for the partner. When I asked my boss about buying Ekahau and the USB key, it was complicated because of the high cost, which is €5,000."
"The product is quite expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Modeling and Simulation solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise15
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ekahau Site Survey?
Things to consider when choosing Ekahau Sidekick2: you need to add another 10% to the purchase price to buy Apple ipads as the Android version of the Ekahau survey app does NOT support APOS surveys...
What needs improvement with Ekahau Site Survey?
Ekahau could be improved by adding three-dimensional modeling, as we currently cannot view APIs in a three-dimensional perspective. They need to include backhaul features and improve the ease of in...
What is your primary use case for Ekahau Site Survey?
I use Ekahau for Wi-Fi designs and other services. It is used for troubleshooting and for analyzing the network. Additionally, we analyze each and every API, FSID, power transmission, bitrates, and...
 

Also Known As

Cisco NAE, Candid
Ekahau Site Survey
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

West Corporation, Axians Nordic, Robert Bosch, DICTU, Tenaris
Presidio, Planet Earth, Ruckus
Find out what your peers are saying about Ekahau, Cisco, iBwave and others in Network Modeling and Simulation. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.