Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] vs CloudCheckr comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cisco and Spot - A Flexera company are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Spot - A Flexera company users who would recommend it.

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS ...

Read 1 Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Read 15 CloudCheckr reviews

7,336 Views
3,961 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS ...

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] and CloudCheckr based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Piston Enterprise OS ...

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CloudCheckr

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (9th), Cloud Cost Management (12th), Managed Cloud Services (5th), AI Observability (23rd)

Featured Reviews

Enterprise677

BS Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

A simple interface and helpful support for a solution that grows with us

It's a flexible enough tool to submit the changes that you want. It gives you the ability to cancel any loop. You can connect new orchestrations together. It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device. The user interface is simple and easy to use.

Read full review

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work

The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I strongly recommend the solution to people."

"It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device."

"The billing feature is great, it is easy to set up, the solution is mostly stable, the scalability is great, and it offers excellent technical support."

"The recommendation section is pretty helpful."

"The Cost Allocation feature of CloudCheckr is the first priority of the customer."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security has a lot more detail than the native cloud service cost-management tools."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"CloudCheckr has positively impacted our organization as we've cut AWS spend by around 25% over two years."

"CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production."

"CloudCheckr offers excellent features, with the ease of scale through cloud operations being the most valuable to us because we need to be able to transition through those well and with the least amount of resistance as possible."

More CloudCheckr pros

Cons

"The solution is just too expensive, so maybe the pricing could be better."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"I was not satisfied with the customer support from CloudCheckr."

"The interface could be improved because it is too dense and overloaded with too many charts and too much information on each screen."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

More CloudCheckr cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

CloudCheckr must be cost-efficient.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

Some limitations are faced sometimes depending on the dependency, service availability, or any service limitation. I think this is the negative impact. I would love to know about future updates and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudCheckr ?

We perform many services and professional services for our clients using CloudCheckr. Professional services include one-time scope locked services, where we deploy the infrastructure or whatever th...

See all answers

Comparisons

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] Competitors

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

Apptio Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 3% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudCheckr

Compared 3% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2026

Download Cisco Piston Enterprise OS [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

CloudCheckr

October 2026

Download CloudCheckr product report

Also Known As

Piston Enterprise OS

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

Overview

Piston Enterprise OS (pentOS) is an enterprise grade cloud operating system meeting the security and governance needs of enterprises wanting to use OpenStack for their infrastructure services. pentOS is an OpenStack distro that builds on top of the OpenStack codebase adding some proprietary features to meet the security and governance needs of the enterprise customers.

Cisco

CloudCheckr offers a cohesive platform for managing cloud infrastructures with a focus on cost visibility, security, and compliance. Designed for multi-cloud environments, it provides insights and optimizations to enhance decision-making and resource efficiency.

CloudCheckr delivers thorough cloud management with features like cost analysis, security and compliance checks, and automated optimization suggestions. Its intuitive interface allows for easy deployment, supporting cost-saving measures. Users often find its cost visibility, multi-cloud integration capabilities, and granular reporting particularly beneficial. However, improvements can be made in areas such as Azure and Google Cloud integration, reporting capabilities, pricing model clarity, and UI complexity reduction.

What are CloudCheckr's key features?

Intuitive Interface: Easy navigation and deployment enhance user interaction.
Cost Visibility: Offers in-depth financial analysis and efficiency insights.
Granular Reporting: Customizable reports that provide detailed insights.
Multi-Cloud Integration: Supports various cloud platforms efficiently.
Actionable Insights: Auto-generated optimizations help reduce expenses.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost Reduction: Identifies idle resources and optimizes usage.
Resource Management: Facilitates effective allocation and governance.
Improved Security: Runs compliance checks and addresses vulnerabilities.
Managed Services: Simplifies billing and supports multi-tenant environments.

Industries using CloudCheckr benefit from enhanced cloud financial optimization and security monitoring. Managed service providers find it crucial for customer billing, while organizations leverage its multi-cloud support for maintaining compliance and governing usage. Specifically useful in sectors like finance and technology, it aids in data analysis and cost-saving strategies.

Spot - A Flexera company

Sample Customers

Kuwait Petroleum Italia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, Broadcom, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.