Cisco Secure Workload vs TrendAI Deep Security comparison

Cisco and TrendAI are both solutions in the Cloud and Data Center Security category. Cisco is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.5, while TrendAI is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9. Cisco holds a 11.0% mindshare in CDCS, compared to TrendAI’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of TrendAI users who would recommend it.

Cisco Secure Workload

Read 15 Cisco Secure Workload reviews

4,609 Views
3,226 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TrendAI Deep Security

Read 100 TrendAI Deep Security reviews

9,661 Views
1,836 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Workload

TrendAI Deep Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 26, 2026

TrendAI Deep Security and Cisco Secure Workload are both prominent contenders in the cybersecurity management field. TrendAI Deep Security is preferred for its competitive pricing and customer service satisfaction. However, Cisco Secure Workload has the edge with its extensive feature set and higher perceived value.

Features: TrendAI Deep Security offers robust threat protection, real-time monitoring, and seamless integration with existing systems. Cisco Secure Workload provides extensive policy enforcement, workload protection across multi-cloud environments, and application dependency mapping.

Room for Improvement: TrendAI Deep Security could enhance its automation capabilities, refine its user interface for better navigation, and improve scalability for larger enterprises. Cisco Secure Workload may benefit from simplifying its complex integration processes, reducing the cost of implementation, and offering more flexible licensing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TrendAI Deep Security presents a straightforward deployment process alongside ample support resources. Cisco Secure Workload features a flexible deployment model ideal for large-scale operations, bolstered by extensive customer service that aids in adaptable deployment in diverse environments.

Pricing and ROI: TrendAI Deep Security is favored for its lower initial setup cost, yielding significant ROI for smaller-scale implementations. Conversely, Cisco Secure Workload justifies its higher investment through long-term savings and advanced protection features, offering greater ROI for more extensive and complex deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Secure Workload vs. TrendAI Deep Security Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Workload vs. TrendAI Deep Security

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,961 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Secure Workload

Ranking in Cloud and Data Center Security

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (15th), Microsegmentation Software (4th), Cisco Security Portfolio (8th)

TrendAI Deep Security

Ranking in Cloud and Data Center Security

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

100

Ranking in other categories

Virtualization Security (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Cloud and Data Center Security category, the mindshare of Cisco Secure Workload is 11.0%, down from 13.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TrendAI Deep Security is 7.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud and Data Center Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Trend Micro Deep Security	7.3%
Cisco Secure Workload	11.0%
Other	81.7%

Cloud and Data Center Security

Featured Reviews

Raj Metkar

Director, Head of Networks at MUFG, EMEA

Discover internal application dependencies and create a dependency map

We actively seek improvements in integrating the Infoblox DDI platform with Cisco Secure Workload. This integration allows Cisco Secure Workload to learn about our networks and network tags, providing valuable insights into vulnerabilities related to the operating system and various applications installed on our servers. Recently, Cisco announced a new product called HyperShield, an AI-based autonomous micro-segmentation solution. While Cisco has not stated that HyperShield will replace Cisco Secure Workload, it represents a natural evolution for the company. HyperShield features dynamic policy discovery and enforcement; however, once policies are enforced, they do not change until a discovery occurs, requiring a re-enforcement process. This new platform operates autonomously, minimizing the need for user or security engineer intervention. I would have expected Cisco to incorporate more automatic discovery and enforcement features within the existing Cisco Secure Workload product. Instead of enhancing the current product, they have introduced a new solution. Cisco plans to honor existing Tetration licenses, allowing users to transition to HyperShield without additional costs, reflecting the investment enterprises have already made. From Cisco’s perspective, this represents a natural progression in their product line. While the product name changes, it seems more of a rebranding effort. The enhancements are greater autonomy, improved discovery, and automatic enforcement, which are now being introduced in HyperShield. Cisco Secure Workload offers automatic policy enforcement but cannot adjust policies dynamically as the application needs to change. Having used the platform for the past five years, the recent announcement has been reassuring. Cisco has confirmed that our investment in the platform will not go to waste. They will honor our existing licenses, providing a natural migration path to the new solution without any disruption

Read full review

reviewer2759025

Information Technology Service Desk Manager at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Virtual patching has protected critical workloads and reduced downtime across financial environments

The best features Trend Micro Deep Security offers include virtual patching and comprehensive protection from multiple modules such as anti-malware, web reputation, firewall, integrity monitoring, and log inspection. It is very user-friendly, easy to understand, and helps us integrate multiple products with Deep Security. The user-friendly aspect and integration of Trend Micro Deep Security have helped my team significantly. For example, we can integrate our SIEM product, Active Directory, and multiple platforms. If an operations engineer cannot find something or forgets about a suspicious activity, we can identify the suspicious thing with the help of the SIEM. With Active Directory, we maintain our compliance, checking which server has Deep Security and which does not. By integrating these solutions, we effectively maintain compliance in our environment. Trend Micro Deep Security has positively impacted our organization because we have implemented it for multiple purposes, primarily for server security. It is installed on both multiple virtual and physical servers with minimal performance impact. It has been extremely stable throughout our usage, with no major disturbances.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product offers great visibility into the network so we can enforce security measures."

"The most valuable feature is micro-segmentation, which is the most important with respect to visibility."

"The product provides multiple-device integration."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that we don't have to do packet captures on the network."

"Instead of proving that all the access control lists are in place and all the EPGs are correct, we can just point the auditor to a dashboard and point out that there aren't any escaped conversations. It saves an enormous, enormous amount of time."

"The only use case I can see that makes sense is micro-segmentation. I think there are other use cases for it. The main purpose of the product is to do micro-segmentation by collecting IP. That could be done by installing an agent, and then you have all the communication coming in and out. You could also use some flow sensors installed in the network that receive a copy of the traffic and then report that back to the system."

"Secure Workload's best feature is that it's an end-to-end offering from Cisco."

"By using Tetration insight, we are able to get the latency on our level accounts and we can determine whatever the issue is with the application latency itself."

More Cisco Secure Workload pros

"Some of the main features of this solution are it is reliable and can be used in small to large size businesses."

"The most valuable and advanced feature of the solution is the ability to check vulnerabilities."

"The solution's features, including real-time monitoring, IPS activity, and firewall alerts, are found to be the most effective in our company"

"The initial setup was straightforward and we didn't have any problem with it."

"Very straightforward and very easy to implement."

"There is no competition for this product, as no other product provides HIPS, host-firewall, and anti-malware together."

"Virtual patching stands out as the best feature Trend Micro Deep Security offers, allowing us to virtually patch servers without downtime, which is critical given our limited patching windows, and helps prevent servers from being exploited."

"Trend Micro Deep Security has a sandboxing unit, which is one of the major features that actually gives you a chance to detect any kind of threat in your network or on your servers."

More TrendAI Deep Security pros

Cons

"There's room for improvement when it comes to Cisco Secure Workload. A couple of internal areas could be refined a little bit. They are trying to solve it, depending on where you suppose the agent is. Suppose you have the agent on both the server and the client, which could be the front-end server or web server connecting to the. In that case, if those two are communicating on RPC, the server can look into its configuration. It could go down and find the configuration file on the FTP server and then set the policies to it. But there are a lot of different FTP servers out there. It's also a complex case for the tool to support all FTP servers."

"It has an uninviting interface."

"The integration could be better, especially with different types of solutions."

"It is highly scalable, but there is a limitation that it is only available on Cisco devices."

"There was a controversy when Cisco reduced the amount of data they kept, and the solution became quite cost-intensive, which made its adoption challenging….Although they have modified it now, I preferred the previous version, and I wish all the functionality were back under the same product."

"It is not so easy to use and configure. It needs a bunch of further resources to work, which is mainly the biggest downside of it. The deployment is huge."

"The interface is really helpful for technical people, but it is not user-friendly."

"The multi-tenancy, redundancy, backup and restore functionalities, as well as the monitoring aspects of the solution, need improvement. The solution offers virtually no enterprise-grade possibility for monitoring."

More Cisco Secure Workload cons

"What this product lacks at this stage is the ability to have automated workbooks to do the response. At this stage, the response is more manual, and it is not automated. If there is a response functionality in Deep Security, similar to what we have in EDR these days, to automatically respond to some of the threats, it would be cool. So, we'd like to have an automated response. There should be a response functionality."

"The price could be reduced."

"While it is fundamentally good, the patches are released every month; if it could remain stable for a longer time, it would be helpful instead of requiring monthly patches."

"The initial setup was complex."

"We are not very happy with Trend Micro Deep Security since it is not able to detect many viruses and bugs."

"They need to build in a central console because central integration is not very good right now."

"Some of the reporting and integrations could be more robust."

"The cost is very high."

More TrendAI Deep Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a bit higher than we anticipated."

"Regarding price, Cisco Secure Workload can be expensive if you don't have a budget. If you're not doing micro-segmentation, every extra security measure or enforcement you're putting on top of your existing environment will be an extra cost. It's not a cheap solution at all. But from my point of view, if you need to do micro-segmentation, this is one of the best tools I've seen for it. I can't compare that to Microsoft's solution because I haven't looked into it. I've looked into VMware and Cisco. Those are the only two that I know of. I didn't know that Microsoft could do micro-segmentation at all. Maybe they can, but I haven't heard anything about it."

"The price is based on how many computers you're going to install it on."

"The price is outrageous. If you have money to throw at the product, then do it."

"It is not cheap and pricing may limit scalability."

"Pricing depends on the scope of the application and the features. Larger installations save more."

"The cost for the hardware is around 300k."

"The solution is offered at an average price point"

"Purchasing this solution through the AWS Marketplace was secure and quick. AWS has good prices for a good product."

"We pay a yearly fee of between $10,000 and $15,000."

"Trend Micro Deep Security is quite expensive."

"Most of it is annual at this stage."

"It is expensive but reasonable compared to other products by Trend Micro."

"We need to make yearly payments for the solution's licensing. There are different pricing models, like subscription-based and perpetual."

"The cost runs around forty dollars per server a month."

More TrendAI Deep Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	37
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Secure Workload?

CloudStrike offers antivirus capabilities and firewall features for servers and VDI but lacks automatic policy discovery. This raises questions about the resources required to discover and write po...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Secure Workload?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cisco Secure Workload?

When we onboarded Cisco Secure Workload, the usual use case was to discover internal application dependencies and create a dependency map for Cisco ACI. As the network team, we chose to implement A...

See all answers

Is Crowdstrike Falcon better than Trend Micro Deep Security?

I like that Crowdstrike allows me to easily correlate data between my firewalls. What’s most useful for my needs is the intelligence modules feature. I also find that Crowdstrike Falcon’s dashboard...

See all answers

What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?

Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Trend Micro Deep Security?

I like the anti-malware features.

See all answers

Comparisons

Illumio vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 18% of the time

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 15% of the time

VMware NSX vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Hypershield vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco Secure Workload Competitors

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs TrendAI Deep Security

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs TrendAI Deep Security

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs TrendAI Deep Security

Compared 8% of the time

Symantec Data Center Security vs TrendAI Deep Security

Compared 5% of the time

Entrust CloudControl vs TrendAI Deep Security

Compared 3% of the time

More TrendAI Deep Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Workload

February 2026

Download Cisco Secure Workload product report

Buyer's Guide

TrendAI Deep Security

January 2026

Download TrendAI Deep Security product report

Also Known As

Cisco Tetration

Deep Security

Overview

Cisco Secure Workload is a cloud and data security solution that offers a zero-trust policy of keeping an organization’s application workloads safe and secure throughout the entire on-premise and cloud data center ecosystems.

Cisco Secure Workload will consistently provide protection by discovering workload process anomalies, stopping threats immediately, minimizing the risk threat surface, and aborting any lateral movement.

Today’s ecosystems are very elastic, and in the application-focused dynamic of today’s aggressive marketplace, Cisco Secure Workload delivers a robust security solution that works effectively with today’s most popular applications. The solution uniquely surrounds each and every workload to ensure organizations are able to keep their data, network, and applications safe and secure at all times. Cisco Secure Workload ensures that enterprise organizations can maintain secure applications by consistently building firewalls around every workload level throughout the entire ecosystem. The solution can manage applications that are deployed on containers, virtual machines, or bare-metal servers.

Cisco Secure workload is able to meet an organization's busy needs and offers flexible options such as Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and on-premises options. Using the Secure Workload SaaS options, users receive all the benefits of Cisco Secure Workload protection without the hassle of having to deploy and maintain the platform on premises. Users are responsible for acquiring the necessary software licensing and deploying software agents. Using SaaS, Secure Workload runs in the cloud and is operated and maintained by Cisco. This option offers the ability to scale easily and is a popular choice for SaaS-first and SaaS-only clients. Many organizations find they get the best TCO and achieve the best productivity and profitability using the SaaS options.

When choosing on-premises options, organizations choose between hardware-based appliance models (large or small form factors). Platform selection is dependent on scalability goals, the desired fidelity level of flow telemetry, and the actual number of workloads. When a user chooses to configure Cisco Secure Workload for a conversation-only flow telemetry for all workloads, each platform has the capability to scale up vertically twice the default platform scale. Additionally, with Secure Workload, it is possible for the platform to be scaled horizontally in order to satisfy the demands of extra large widely distributed enterprise environments using federation capabilities.

Cisco Secure Workload also provides a robust disaster recovery (DR) tool, which helps to make it a complete, comprehensive solution. The DR allows for continuous restore and backup capabilities that enable users to quickly remediate operations and data to a standby cluster in the event of a drastic failure or disaster.

Reviews from Real Users

“The solution offers 100% telemetry coverage. The telemetry you collect is not sampled, it's not intermittent. It's complete. You see everything in it, including full visibility of all activities on your endpoints and in your network. Other valuable features include vast support for annotations, flexible user applications, machine learning, automatic classification, and hierarchical policies.” - CTO at a tech vendor

Cisco

TrendAI Deep Security offers advanced protection with anti-malware, virtual patching, and intrusion prevention. It supports hybrid and cloud environments, providing comprehensive security solutions for large organizations.

TrendAI Deep Security provides a robust suite of features tailored for defending systems against evolving threats. With centralized management, it seamlessly integrates with hybrid and cloud environments. Notable is its virtual patching, which reduces zero-day vulnerability risks and downtime, making it an optimal choice for large corporations seeking extensive protection. Despite challenges like less intuitive dashboards, compatibility, and performance issues during scanning, it excels in server and endpoint protection, intrusion detection, and application control. It's particularly effective in financial sectors and integrates with cloud platforms to automate security policy deployment.

What are TrendAI Deep Security's most significant features?

Anti-Malware: Guards against modern threats across multiple environments.
Virtual Patching: Shields systems from zero-day vulnerabilities without immediate updates.
Intrusion Prevention: Detects and prevents unauthorized access attempts.
Firewall Capabilities: Ensures network safety by regulating data across systems.
Cloud Integration: Provides seamless operations with automated policy application.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Users should expect robust security for both physical and virtual environments.
Operational Efficiency: Look for improved efficiency due to automated processes and policy applications.
Zero-Day Protection: Consider the benefits of virtual patching in minimizing downtime and security risks.
Compliance Support: Ensure the feature aids in adhering to industry-specific regulations.
Centralized Management: Centralized control simplifies security management across infrastructures.

Organizations in sectors like finance deploy TrendAI Deep Security for its virtual patching and hybrid environment support. The solution's adaptability across cloud platforms ensures secure workloads, making it essential for environments requiring robust threat detection and monitoring.

TrendAI

Sample Customers

ADP, University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNCC)

Rush University Medical Center, Guess? Inc., Mazda Motor Logistics Europe, MEDHOST, KSC Commercial Internet Co., Ricoh Company Ltd., Square Enix, SoftBank Telecom, Telecom Italia, United Way of Greater Atlanta, A&W Food Services of Canada

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Workload vs. TrendAI Deep Security

February 2026

Free Report: Cisco Secure Workload vs. TrendAI Deep Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Secure Workload vs. TrendAI Deep Security and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Secure Workload vs. TrendAI Deep Security report.

See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.