Cisco Wireless vs Omada Access Points comparison

Cisco and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cisco is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while TP-Link is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.9. Cisco holds a 11.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Cisco Wireless

Read 153 Cisco Wireless reviews

15,312 Views
14,009 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

4,243 Views
3,405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Wireless

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Cisco Wireless and Omada Access Points compete in the enterprise wireless networking category. Cisco Wireless holds the upper hand due to its advanced features, stability, and support for enterprise scenarios, whereas Omada prioritizes affordability and ease of use, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

Features: Cisco Wireless offers security enhancements, seamless roaming, and robust management tools, focusing on high stability and scalability. It integrates well with other Cisco products and supports advanced security. Omada Access Points highlight ease of deployment, cost-effectiveness, and compatibility with essential management tools, proving reliable for smaller organizations.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Wireless users identify areas for improvement in pricing, ease of management, and cloud capabilities, criticizing its complex configurations and integration with non-Cisco products. Omada Access Points require enhancements in handling high user volumes, connection speed, and security, with users seeking better management tools and mesh features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Wireless mostly targets on-premises deployments with some cloud offerings, requiring professional expertise despite being straightforward. Its customer service is regarded as strong but occasionally inconsistent. Omada Access Points simplify deployment, earning praise for ease of use, and provide reliable customer service, though with a more limited support network.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Wireless incurs higher costs, attributed to its advanced features and stability, presented through complex licensing models. It affords significant ROI over time through enhanced connectivity and management. Omada Access Points offer a more affordable one-time purchase model, advantageous for smaller budgets, delivering substantial value and reliability without ongoing licensing fees.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Wireless vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,589 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Wireless

Ranking in Wireless LAN

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

153

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Wireless is 11.5%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

GulfrazAhmad

Division Head Enterprise Infrastructure (SVP) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Integrates with ISE, and is secure, reliable, and easy to deploy

The main concern is the length and overlapping. We have to put on four to six access points on the same floor, and we face the issue of overlapping areas. If Cisco can extend the range of their indoor APs, we would need to install just one or two access points, and it would eliminate the problem of the overlapping area. They should provide built-in features for safe authentication. Right now, we integrate with ISE and FortiClient for this feature. We first check the NAC, and after the NAC and before the domain, a token password installed on their mobile or a physical token is required to join the network. If Cisco had built-in authentication, we would be able to eliminate one product from our network.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco Wireless products are easy to use."

"This product has a long life and you don't have any issues with it."

"Authentication is the important feature for us. My IT staff no longer has to look after catering to clients who come from overseas."

"Cisco is one of the leading brands, particularly in the commercial sector. Other brands such as Extreme, cater to different categories at lower levels. Cisco maintains a comprehensive product range across all levels and excels in comparison to other networking sites. They also boast a team of highly qualified professionals, a feature that sets them apart from competitors like Netgear, which lacks such expertise."

"Some of the features I find valuable are the FlexConnect and overall it is a good global solution."

"Cisco Wireless is scalable."

"The solution offers very good application visibility and control integration for other analysis software."

"Compared to other solutions, captive guest network is one of the best isolation and tunneling."

More Cisco Wireless pros

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"The coverage provided by the solution is an area of concern in some cases, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The product could improve the security system's alertness to detect and respond to intrusions more effectively."

"Older versions used to be hard to deploy. The latest OS, however, has made things a lot easier. While deployment is much better, it could always be even easier."

"The product’s interface must be improved."

"Many wireless controllers' firmware have bugs in their new releases, which are not stable, especially in an environment with many wireless AP (WAP) types."

"The new licensing has no added value and seems to be Cisco's effort to take advantage of customers."

"When you integrate a network access control with authentication with an ISE engine it's really complicated to put in place."

"There are areas for improvement with Cisco Wireless, as well as with wireless technology in general. For instance, while Wi-Fi 6 offers significant advancements, some unresolved issues and quirks have delayed our migration to this standard."

More Cisco Wireless cons

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its licensing is hard to understand."

"The price of this solution is a little more than competitors."

"Expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a ten out of ten. It is expensive compared to Aruba and Juniper."

"They have simplified the licensing, now there is a single license that is required. Earlier, multiple licenses were required. Single licensing is good. As a customer, I don't need to keep an inventory of multiple licenses."

"Pricing is a little higher for Cisco Wireless than all other vendors. Cisco should work on improving the pricing because there are some other vendors out there in the market which may have the same features or equivalent features that Cisco has at a lesser price."

"Its licensing is not simple. There are additional license costs for features, which is frustrating for us. There are some features that are included for free in the base Aruba product, but they are available at additional costs in this solution."

"It's expensive. The pricing is an obstacle."

More Cisco Wireless pricing and cost advice

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,589 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user212721

President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Mar 24, 2015

Cisco vs. Aruba Wireless Solutions

Cisco or Aruba Networks? If you are considering wireless access solutions, this is a common question that you are probably asking. You probably have sales people knocking at your door. How do you make sense of all the stories that you are presented with. If you have done any research, you are…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?

Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...

See all answers

Which is better - Ruckus Wireless or Cisco Wireless?

Ruckus Wireless offers users the benefit of being both easy to set up and get running as well as being very user friendly. This user-friendly quality also renders it easy to learn how to use and ma...

See all answers

How does Cisco Wireless compare with Aruba Wireless?

On the most basic level, Cisco Wireless can offer a rather straightforward initial setup. In the span of about three hours, the basic framework can be set up. Step-by-step instructions are availabl...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 31% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 26% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 6% of the time

Juniper WLC Series vs Cisco Wireless

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Wireless Competitors

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 20% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 18% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 10% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless

April 2025

Download Cisco Wireless product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

March 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Cisco WLAN Controller

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Cisco Wireless is a comprehensive suite of wireless solutions designed to deliver secure, high-performance connectivity for enterprises of all sizes. Offering a range of access points, controllers, and advanced management tools, Cisco Wireless ensures seamless and reliable network access, enhancing mobility and productivity.

Cisco Wireless solutions provide robust, scalable wireless networks capable of supporting high-density environments and diverse applications. With features such as seamless roaming, advanced security protocols, and detailed analytics, Cisco Wireless addresses the needs of modern businesses. The solutions include the Cisco Catalyst and Aironet series access points, wireless LAN controllers, and the Cisco DNA Center for centralized management and automation.

What are the key features of Cisco Wireless?

High-Density Performance: Optimized for environments with a high number of devices, ensuring reliable connectivity and performance.
Advanced Security: Incorporates robust security measures such as WPA3, Secure Boot, and segmentation to protect data and devices.
Seamless Roaming: Enables uninterrupted connectivity as users move across different areas within the network.
Centralized Management: Cisco DNA Center provides a single pane of glass for managing and automating wireless networks, enhancing operational efficiency.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports various deployment models, including on-premises, cloud-managed, and hybrid solutions.

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Cisco Wireless?

Improved Mobility and Productivity: Users often highlight how Cisco Wireless enhances user mobility and productivity through reliable and consistent connectivity.
Scalability: Reviews frequently mention the scalability of Cisco Wireless, making it suitable for growing businesses.
Ease of Management: Many users appreciate the centralized management capabilities, which simplify network administration and troubleshooting.
Enhanced Security: The advanced security features are often noted for providing peace of mind and compliance with industry standards.
User Experience: The overall user experience, including ease of use and seamless integration with other Cisco products, is a common point of praise.

Cisco Wireless solutions are implemented across various industries, including healthcare, education, retail, and manufacturing. In healthcare, they support critical applications like patient monitoring and electronic health records. Educational institutions use Cisco Wireless to provide reliable internet access for students and staff. Retailers benefit from enhanced customer experiences through in-store connectivity, while manufacturers use wireless networks to improve operational efficiency and automation.

Pricing and licensing for Cisco Wireless solutions are typically based on the scale of deployment and specific product selections. Cisco offers various support plans, including 24/7 customer service, technical support, and access to software updates and patches.

In summary, Cisco Wireless provides robust, scalable wireless networking solutions that enhance connectivity, security, and management for diverse enterprise environments.

Cisco

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

March 2025

Free Report: Cisco Wireless vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,589 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Wireless vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.