Omada Access Points vs Ubiquiti WLAN comparison

TP-Link and Ubiquiti are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. TP-Link is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Ubiquiti is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.2. TP-Link holds a 3.8% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Ubiquiti’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of TP-Link users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Ubiquiti users who would recommend it.

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,138 Views
3,107 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Ubiquiti WLAN

Read 46 Ubiquiti WLAN reviews

3,890 Views
3,851 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Ubiquiti WLAN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Ubiquiti WLAN and Omada Access Points compete in the wireless networking category. Ubiquiti often holds the upper hand owing to its ease of deployment and cost-effective solutions.

Features:Ubiquiti stands out with ease of setup, remote management capabilities, and robust network tools like heat maps and proactive alerts. Its simple pricing model without recurring fees and comprehensive documentation are highly favored. Omada is notable for its reliability and compatibility with both wired and wireless technology. It offers effective network control with modern interfaces, appealing to budget-conscious buyers looking for ease of integration with cloud-based management.

Room for Improvement:Ubiquiti could enhance its support infrastructure and troubleshooting tools. Areas like signal strength adjustment and cloud-based management are identified for improvement. Omada seeks improvements in scalability and advanced security measures for larger enterprises. Enhancing configuration flexibility and adding features like automatic interference handling are suggested to improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Both Ubiquiti and Omada support on-premises deployments, but Ubiquiti offers more flexibility with public cloud options. However, both receive criticism for relying heavily on community forums for support. Ubiquiti’s deployment is straightforward but could improve in customer service responsiveness. Omada provides adequate community support but users call for more immediate professional guidance.

Pricing and ROI:Ubiquiti is known for its affordability with a one-time purchase model devoid of licensing fees, providing a strong ROI for SMEs. Omada Access Points are budget-friendly with attractive upfront pricing, although additional licensing costs may accrue for certain features, still serving companies well without heavy operational overheads.

To learn more, read our detailed Omada Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ubiquiti WLAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ubiquiti WLAN is 5.1%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ubiquiti WLAN	5.1%
Omada Access Points	3.8%
Other	91.1%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

reviewer1253430

Development & Innovation Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions

Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development. They could also enhance the reporting capabilities. At the same time, Omada's reporting has improved considerably in the latest version. That was an issue for us, but now it seems okay. More carrier-grade integrations should be available on Omada access points in the future. They could also add a hot spot and maybe a mobile upload solution. I still have issues from time to time when switching access points. I'm still connected to the SSID, but my signal drops when I switch from 5 Ghz to 2.4 Ghz. I'm not switched to the other access point that is closer to me. I should have been switched automatically to the other access point. Occasionally, the handoff doesn't work. I have tried this with WiFi 6, and it worked fine, so I think they may have resolved this issue in the latest versions.

Read full review

Gabriele-Pizzigati

Senior Software and Systems Engineer at SAMU.IT

Managing installations through one interface enhances efficiency but AI features improvement

Ubiquiti Wireless LAN is reliable and offers a good quality product. It provides one interface to manage all installations, allowing me to monitor all customers through the same web interface. The web interface in the controller allows for quick configuration of devices with just one click, which is a significant advantage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pricing is reasonable."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

More Omada Access Points pros

"The product’s most valuable feature is the workflow-driven setup for the infrastructure component."

"The initial setup was very straightforward."

"I am totally satisfied with the functionality of Ubiquiti WLAN for my clients; it does exactly what I need."

"There was a time when we were using Cisco switches and attempting to integrate Ubiquiti UniFi switches into our network infrastructure. Eventually, after some effort, we managed to understand the process. Initially, it was challenging to configure the unified console to manage virtual networks alongside internal networks effectively. We had to comprehend how both systems would integrate carefully. It became apparent that maximizing the usage of Cisco switches required a thorough understanding of how UniFi operates at the backend."

"I find the features of Ubiquiti WLAN most valuable."

"The main advantage of Ubiquiti WLAN is the network management. The whole concept has one complete range of products from end to end, with very basic and effective management systems. That's a key benefit in my mind. But the main thing is that it's so competitive—far more competitive than the other leading American brands."

"The solution works well and in the short time I have used it, I've enjoyed its capabilities."

"I have found Ubiquiti WLAN scalable. We have approximately 200 users using the solution in my organization and do not plan to increase usage."

More Ubiquiti WLAN pros

Cons

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

More Omada Access Points cons

"Its scalability, UI, and security features could be better."

"When I started to upgrade, the controller for Unbuntu was really struggling to start up, however, that has since been solved."

"The logs are not detailed enough. You can't clearly see what is being blocked in Ubiquiti WLAN, making the troubleshooting process a little bit harder."

"The statistics you can get on it are a bit limited from what I have seen so far."

"A potential improvement could be the addition of artificial intelligence features, similar to what Ruckus offers."

"The product's area of concern revolves around its lack of support."

"My expert view on Ubiquiti improvement is that capacity has been a concern, especially since I needed to change some of my devices to a 10 gig network due to limitations."

"The solution should support a larger bandwidth or distance between the access points and the main stations."

More Ubiquiti WLAN cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten. It is high."

"This solution is reasonably priced."

"The tool is affordable."

"It’s an expensive product but has all the essential qualities and functionality."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"The solution is cheap. I rate its pricing as three out of ten."

"Ubiquiti WLAN is cheap. It can work without licensing."

"There is a license required for this solution."

More Ubiquiti WLAN pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Is Ubiquiti Wireless better than Ruckus Wireless WAN?

Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is ve...

See all answers

Which is better - Ubiquiti WLAN or Aruba Instant?

We researched Ubiquiti and Aruba when looking for a WLAN solution. Ubiquiti offers good WLAN access both indoors and outdoors. It provides an enterprise-level WIFI while remaining cost-effective. U...

See all answers

What do you like most about Ubiquiti WLAN?

Anyone can buy the product off the shelf and configure it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Aruba Instant On Access Points vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Huawei Wireless vs Ubiquiti WLAN

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Ubiquiti WLAN

Compared 11% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Ubiquiti WLAN

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Ubiquiti WLAN

Compared 8% of the time

NETGEAR Insight Access Points vs Ubiquiti WLAN

Compared 5% of the time

More Ubiquiti WLAN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

January 2026

Download Omada Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Ubiquiti WLAN

January 2026

Download Ubiquiti WLAN product report

Also Known As

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

No data available

Overview

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

UniFi is a revolutionary Wi-Fi system that combines Enterprise performance, unlimited scalability, a central management controller and disruptive pricing.

Ubiquiti

Sample Customers

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

NASCAR Grand-AM, Maritime Parc, Outdoor Music Festival, One Republic Tour, British Armed Forces, Arcadia School District, Bartlett School District, Universidad del Azuay, Estelar Hotels, Intercontinental Bali, Moscow - Enforta, Miami - Sling Broadband, Manhattan - MST, Ecuador - Aire.EC

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN

February 2026

Free Report: Omada Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN

Find out what your peers are saying about Omada Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Omada Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.