Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Dizzion comparison

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citri...

Read 4 Dizzion reviews

368 Views
42 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 2, 2025

Citrix DaaS and Dizzion are competing in the Desktop as a Service market. Citrix DaaS seems to have the upper hand due to its strong emphasis on flexibility and integration with enterprise solutions.

Features: Citrix DaaS offers strong virtualization capabilities, seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure, and extensive scalability options. Dizzion focuses on providing secure virtual desktops with compliance-focused solutions, tailored especially for industries such as healthcare and finance.

Room for Improvement: Citrix DaaS could improve by enhancing security features to better cater to highly regulated industries. It may also work on simplifying the deployment process further and increasing cost-effectiveness. Dizzion could benefit from expanding its scalability options, improving integration with third-party tools, and offering better support for complex enterprise environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Citrix DaaS provides a comprehensive support system backed by a robust knowledge base, easing the deployment process. Dizzion is recognized for its fast deployment and personalized support, appealing to businesses needing quick implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Citrix DaaS involves higher initial costs but promises a good long-term ROI due to its scalability and integration strengths. Dizzion offers competitive pricing, focusing on providing cost-efficient security solutions, making it attractive for compliance-critical sectors.

To learn more, read our detailed Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Dizzion Report (Updated: June 2025).

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Dizzion

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citri...

Ranking in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)

3rd

Ranking in Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

126

Ranking in other categories

Application Virtualization (2nd), Remote Access (4th)

Dizzion

Ranking in Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)

13th

Ranking in Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Desktop as a Service (DaaS) category, the mindshare of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is 33.6%, up from 31.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dizzion is 5.3%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

Featured Reviews

Grant Waddell

Head of IT Architecture & Operations Support at Lyntia

User-friendly and easily accessible, but cost could be made cheaper

We use Citrix Workspace on Citrix Cloud. We have all of our servers on the AWS public cloud. There are a number of tools that we can implement that would save us costs. However, we've stuck to Citrix for convenience. If the prices keep increasing, we will have to consider other solutions. Users need to understand the tool's limitations correctly and what they require from a usability perspective. They should also understand the configuration of security policies. In some cases, people are unable to download or upload files onto their PCs, which is necessary for them to do their work. Users should understand the limitations of the product or the configuration options. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Hamada Farag

Technology Consultant at Beta Information Technology

A cost-effective and streamlined virtual desktop infrastructure solution with a user-friendly interface and simplified management

The singular management interface is crucial, particularly for the operations team as it minimizes complexity and enhances operational efficiency. The simplicity of the management tools is a key highlight, especially when compared to other solutions like Citrix, where there is often complexity due to various components such as controllers, storefronts, and different servers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to connect to our on-premise applications, through the Workspace app and the Workspace experience. The user experience when using the solution's technology remotely is good. Our users are able to work and it's seamless. The performance is also good."

"Remote work has been enhanced"

"The price and user interface are great."

"This is a very stable solution which you can feel confident using."

"The remote desktop feature allows employees to work from home."

"Stable product with straightforward setup."

"It is stable, easy to scale, and provides secure remote access."

"Troubleshooting Citrix is pretty straightforward."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) pros

"Nutanix Frame is easy to install, manage, and upgrade."

"The singular management interface is crucial, particularly for the operations team as it minimizes complexity and enhances operational efficiency."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good."

"The pricing of the solution and management are good features."

Cons

"The sales team does not focus on client needs but instead focuses on selling higher-priced items."

"The product should expand its capabilities for integrating with other environments."

"In the bank, a major part of all our applications is Microsoft App-V. If App-V is at end of life, then we need a new technology to replace it. As of today, I haven't seen in Citrix Studio that there is a new technology embedded directly in it to replace App-V."

"When I needed support for a couple of things, three people intervened. Each time, three people gave me a different answer. In the end, they did not manage to give the right answer. At a certain point, they stopped replying."

"When there are technical issues, sometimes we can't get on the cloud."

"Tech support can be slow if you do not receive help from the US representatives."

"The initial setup has room for improvement."

"The only thing we have found to be detrimental is when we have tried to find training. I realize that we're looking at it at the worst time possible, with a pandemic going on, but it seems that most of the training offered is learn-by-yourself online."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) cons

"As the solution is not completely straightforward, you do need some experience to configure and implement it."

"The solution can be made faster and it should improve performance wise."

"It would be highly beneficial if they could offer a version that is entirely on-premises, eliminating the need for cloud connection except for data access."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the tool's price a three."

"Citrix solutions cost a lot in comparison with competitors, like Azure Virtual Desktop or VMware Horizon. Those solutions cost around 50 to 60 percent less, per month per user, than Citrix."

"We are just now approaching the end of our initial purchase, which was an excellent price for us as an academic institution. We got a very good deal to get us on board. That license is up for renewal in about a year, and we are nervously waiting to see what the pricing will be."

"The price of Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is approximately $300 for the new version called Dash and the license is approximately $900 annually."

"It's costly in the market. But it is not expensive for the company. For the company, it's relatively inexpensive because the core of the work is compensated with the price."

"The tool is expensive."

"We are seeing a return on investment with Citrix Workspace."

"Citrix is expensive."

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of the solution is very good."

"It is a cost-effective option with comparable functionality to competitors."

"The licensing is based on the number of users of the solution."

"Nutanix Frame is a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Desktop as a Service (DaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

My focus has primarily been on publishing virtual applications.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

What needs improvement with Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops?

I have found that Citrix DaaS is still a complex product, especially on the desktop side, which affects scalability. Although it works well on the apps side, the desktop aspect still has room for i...

What do you like most about Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame is easy to install, manage, and upgrade.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame is a very expensive solution.

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Frame?

Nutanix Frame can be used to transition hardware and replace traditional hardware architecture like physical servers, storage, and SAN switches.

Azure Virtual Desktop vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Comparisons

Compared 49% of the time

Amazon Appstream vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 6% of the time

Rocket Exceed TurboX vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 4% of the time

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Compared 4% of the time

More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Competitors

Amazon WorkSpaces vs Dizzion

Compared 35% of the time

More Dizzion Competitors

Product Reports

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service)

Download Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) product report

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) report

Desktop as a Service (DaaS)

Download Dizzion product report

Also Known As

XenDesktop, XenApp (Citrix Virtual Apps), Citrix Workspace

Nutanix Xi Frame, Nutanix Frame

Interactive Demo

Citrix

Demo not available

Overview

Enable secure, flexible work with the leader in virtual apps and desktops

Deliver desktop as a service (DaaS) from any cloud or datacenter

Get started with Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) in minutes to provide a familiar, high-performance digital workspace experience to your users. We’ll manage the infrastructure and security. You focus on your business.

Citrix

Dizzion provides cloud-delivered desktops designed to meet the needs of modern businesses. It offers a secure, flexible environment for managing virtual workloads, enhancing productivity, and ensuring seamless user experiences.

Specializing in virtual desktop infrastructure, Dizzion ensures organizations can securely deploy virtual desktops accessible from any device, enhancing remote work capabilities. This approach allows businesses to maintain operational continuity while securing sensitive data and ensuring compliance with industry standards. By integrating with existing workflows, Dizzion supports enhanced productivity and scalability, leading to a more responsive IT environment.

What are the most important features of Dizzion?

Secure Endpoint Access: Protects data with comprehensive security protocols.
Scalability: Accommodates growing business needs with flexible capacity adjustments.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry-specific regulations and guidelines.
Performance Optimization: Delivers optimized user experiences through efficient resource management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Dizzion reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses by minimizing hardware investments and IT management costs.
Enhanced Productivity: Increases workforce productivity by facilitating remote work.
Data Security: Protects sensitive information, maintaining trust and compliance.
Business Continuity: Supports uninterrupted operations across distributed environments.

Dizzion is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and call centers, allowing organizations to maintain security and compliance while enabling flexible, remote work solutions. Each industry benefits from tailored features that address unique compliance and security challenges, ensuring reliable performance.

Sample Customers

Exelon, Aeronamic, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Alameda County Medical Center, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Aloysius Stichting, Amarchand Mangaldas, AmBev, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arval

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Dizzion