Cloudify vs Freshservice comparison

Cloudify and Freshworks are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cloudify is ranked #40, while Freshworks is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. Cloudify holds a 1.6% mindshare in CM, compared to Freshworks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Freshworks users who would recommend it.

Cloudify

Read 12 Cloudify reviews

1,591 Views
1,527 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Freshservice

Read 40 Freshservice reviews

6,589 Views
857 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cloudify

Freshservice

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Freshservice and Cloudify are competing in IT service management solutions, each offering unique capabilities. Freshservice has the upper hand in user satisfaction with strong customer support and affordable pricing, while Cloudify stands out with advanced features for complex cloud environments.

Features: Freshservice offers automated workflows, integrated asset management, and a service desk component. Cloudify provides multi-cloud orchestration, scalability, and infrastructure automation.

Room for Improvement: Freshservice could enhance its advanced customization capabilities, expand integration options, and improve scalability for larger enterprises. Cloudify might work on streamlining its user interface, simplifying its initial setup, and offering more comprehensive customer support for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Freshservice is known for easy deployment and responsive customer service, enabling quick implementation. Cloudify provides a customizable deployment process designed for intricate environments, allowing for flexibility in detailed configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Freshservice offers competitive pricing with quick ROI due to efficient onboarding and minimal setup costs, while Cloudify has a higher initial investment, delivering significant ROI through flexibility for complex infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudify vs. Freshservice Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. Freshservice

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudify

Ranking in Cloud Management

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Freshservice

Ranking in Cloud Management

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (6th), Project Management Software (10th), IT Asset Management (4th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (4th), Configuration Management Databases (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (9th), AI IT Support (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cloudify is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Freshservice is 1.2%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Freshservice	1.2%
Cloudify	1.6%
Other	97.2%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Mark Wittling

Cloud Architect at Cox communications

Works very well for advanced service chaining requirements and has extremely advanced engineers for support

We had a manager who thought that Cloudify could be used as a replacement for Horizon in OpenStack, but we found that Cloudify lacked the user interface or GUI for doing multitenancy and basic platform management tasks. Cloudify was really good at launching, for example, firewalls and configuring them and doing service chaining and rather advanced things like that, but it didn't meet the requirements for a basic platform management solution. It is something that seems to work better as a bolt-on or an augmented solution. It is a bit mis-marketed as a Cloud Management solution. It is not that. It is more of a service orchestration and automation tool. It is very good at doing that, but it fails to meet basic platform management requirements. Once you have it running, you can't really do anything with it without writing code and scripts. It requires a full-time DevOps person to use it. We deployed a Palo Alto firewall with it. That's basically what the project was for us, and it worked flawlessly once we got it finished, but it took another 12 weeks to get all of the automation and everything else coded, tested, and working. There is certainly a place for this technology, but when we got rid of OpenStack and moved to VMware, we either had to go with the vRealize Automation Suite to do this kind of automation, or we had to find an alternative solution to manage the private cloud. So, we put Cloudify in, but we really couldn't find it useful for basic platform administration tasks.

Read full review

Raja Farrar

IT Service Delivery Manager at Symposiam

Automation and AI have transformed our service delivery and have made IT support faster and more efficient

I always keep up with Freshservice's roadmaps and new features. Freshservice has been very good at listening to feedback and adding those feature requests into their next iterations. I wish they would offer more granular data export options for utilizing in Power BI, along with predictive analytics for capacity planning and SLA breaches to enable more proactive support management and reduce firefighting. While the dashboards are effective, some users find custom reporting limited compared to ServiceNow or Jira. I would also appreciate deeper integrations, especially for niche apps requiring development coding work to enable advanced orchestration. Native integrations for DevOps pipelines such as GitHub Actions and Jenkins, along with stronger API flexibility for complex workflows, would enhance functionality. Although the CMDB and asset management are solid, they do lack advanced dependency mapping compared to other enterprise tools. My wishlist includes automated impact analysis for changes and improved visualization of asset relationships, enabling quicker resolutions from an agent's perspective when alerts come in. I acknowledge that Device42 may enhance this, but it is an extra cost beyond what we already pay. While Freddy AI is excellent for triage and suggestions, some users desire more proactive automation, such as predictive ticket routing based on historical patterns and AI-driven capacity forecasting. Lastly, the pricing tiers might seem rigid for mid-sized teams, so a more granular add-on option for features such as Device42 or pay-per-use for orchestration workflows could be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Valuable features are auto-scaling and load balancing."

"TOSCA model allows modeling the application rather than the automation. It is a machine-readable representation of the application and its infrastructure, which can be used for other things too, not just for the orchestration (e.g. enterprise architecture big picture, who connects to whom)."

"We have found that this is not an undue burden, and the extra work gives immense flexibility and portability."

"It's easy to create a cloud server, such as Linux with JBoss or WebSphere, which is good for continuous deployment."

"The TOSCA model allows modeling the application rather than the automation, providing a machine-readable representation of the application and its infrastructure that can also be used for the enterprise architecture big picture, showing who connects to whom."

"Extensible internal functions and plugins. Can implement custom plugins to fit your scenario. Python based plugins."

"The solution includes the option to run background scripts and processes from a connected API."

"Cloudify works in cases where you have very advanced service chaining requirements. It really works well there, and it fits the best. They have a standardized markup that's based on TOSCA, which is a standard. I like the fact that they're standards-based. Their solution works extremely well if you have the talent and the manpower to write TOSCA descriptors to deploy and interchange services or to automate the configuration and turn up of services."

More Cloudify pros

"The portal is straightforward for the end-user, but that's not the best part of Freshservice; integration is the part that's interesting because it's easy to set up a process, it's extremely simple to integrate, and in one week, you can add change management, which is incredible."

"The portal is straightforward for the end-user, but that's not the best part of Freshservice. Integration is the part that's interesting because it's easy to set up a process. It's extremely simple to integrate. In one week, you can add change management. It's incredible."

"The solution has been very helpful engineering insights into the client's environment. We have been able to manage calls and incidence very efficiently which provides us with a clear understanding of the system warranty and the actions that we might need to take in terms of insights. The system is very dynamic and prevents any kind of over sides which is yours that there is smooth contract management. Also we can easily uphold SLAs and deliver enhanced services without breaching any agreements."

"The most valuable features of Freshservice are the notifications, customization, and flexibility."

"What I have seen in Freshservice is there's no room for customization. Which works as an advantage in some cases and it works as a disadvantage in others. If you are someone that starts managing your IT services, it is a great solution, because there's no way to go out away from the direction of the system. You have to follow the process as it was intended for the designers of a solution because there's no room for customization or configuration."

"Freshservice is very user-friendly and easy to customize."

"I do like the workflow automation capabilities, where based upon certain actions, it will automatically go and route tickets to a particular person. It is fairly user-friendly."

"All features explored in Freshservice have proven to be helpful in reducing workload and ticket redundancy."

More Freshservice pros

Cons

"It lacked the user interface for multitenancy and basic platform management tasks."

"I'd like to see a more simplified upgrade process so it can be completed in one step rather than multiple steps (snapshot backup + snapshot restore)."

"The solution is a bit of a headache because mistakes happen in the blueprint every time we deploy and they require modifications."

"Cloudify is not a turn-key solution, nor designed as such."

"The solution is a bit of a headache because mistakes happen in the blueprint every time we deploy and they require modifications."

"Unlike the Docker environment, Cloudify takes time for configuration and its learning curve."

"Error handling could be improved; GUI is lacking with respect to user privileges and connectivity."

"We'd like to see the maturity of the plugins continue, including Amazon EMR and others."

More Cloudify cons

"Asset management can definitely be improved because it doesn't pick up every single device on the network or every single piece of information. Some manual information still needs to be entered."

"I'd like to see better reporting on changes and as well as enhancements to the task/time function."

"We'd like better integration with other products."

"The only thing I would have against it right now is that the workflow automation is not as granular as we would like it to be, at least for the size of our organization."

"Freshservice could improve the delegation and workflow management features."

"In hindsight, Freshservice isn't the solution we should have chosen, as it's just not customisable enough."

"The round robin ticketing feature that they have is not ideal."

"While the dashboards are effective, some users find custom reporting limited compared to ServiceNow or Jira."

More Freshservice cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't involved in the pricing of it because we were just doing prototype work with it, but I was told by the upper management team that it was quite expensive. That was another reason we switched to Morpheus."

"The cost at the current timing is very reasonable but as the product gains popularity, I anticipate it might become expensive. Fortunately my customers have been offered a generous discount making it more affordable for me and satisfying both my needs and customers requirement."

"Freshservice's licensing costs are pretty good, and it has different categories of pricing based on what modules and features you choose, which gives a lot of flexibility."

"The pricing information is on their website. It's my understanding that their Pro Plan, for example, is around $89/month."

"The price of Freshservice could improve, it is expensive."

"There are some additional costs but not that many. For example, we have unlimited assets, which is something for which we pay extra. We also paid for additional orchestration. I would rate it a three out of five in terms of pricing. They are right in the middle."

"It is good for the price you pay. It has different plans. If you need all features, you need to go for a higher plan. Currently, with the second tier plan, you cannot completely separate the group of agents. So, the agent in each group can see another person's ticket. You also cannot modify the rules based on the viewable, readable stuff and cannot have a custom role in this plan. If you want to do that, you have to go for a higher plan. It works in our case because it doesn't matter if the other group can see our ticket because it doesn't contain anything sensitive. We also didn't need the project or change management features. That's why we didn't go with a higher plan."

"Freshservice is a fairly cheap solution. Though monthly payments can be made towards the licensing costs of the solution, my company prefers to make annual payments."

"Our licensing fee for Freshservice is $2,500 a year."

More Freshservice pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Freshservice?

I do not have any experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, as it was assigned to the infrastructure team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Freshservice?

Freshservice has an AI agent that needs improvement for finding knowledge base articles. When issues or incidents are received in Freshservice, new users should be able to receive direct help from ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Freshservice?

Freshservice is used to redirect ticket handling and acknowledge tickets and incidents received. Tickets are redirected with their short description and subject line in Freshservice, which allows f...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cloudify

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudify

Compared 8% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs Cloudify

Compared 7% of the time

CloudBolt vs Cloudify

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs Cloudify

Compared 4% of the time

More Cloudify Competitors

ServiceNow vs Freshservice

Compared 13% of the time

Zendesk vs Freshservice

Compared 8% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Freshservice

Compared 6% of the time

Device42 vs Freshservice

Compared 4% of the time

Samanage vs Freshservice

Compared 4% of the time

More Freshservice Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify

May 2026

Download Cloudify product report

Buyer's Guide

Freshservice

May 2026

Download Freshservice product report

Also Known As

No data available

Flint

Overview

Cloudify offers seamless orchestration and infrastructure deployment across major cloud platforms such as AWS, Azure, and VMware. Its TOSCA-based standard provides flexibility and integration capabilities, making it an effective tool for multi-cloud operations and infrastructure-as-code management.

Cloudify's robust orchestration abilities are complemented by its ability to support major cloud providers and its ease of use in following templates. The extensibility through custom logic and plugins facilitates orchestrated startups, multi-cloud deployments, service chaining, and operational actions. Despite its strengths, users face challenges such as complex debugging, a steep learning curve when compared to Docker, and limited multitenancy features. There's a need for improvements in installation, event monitoring, error handling, simplified upgrades, and better plugin robustness. Connectivity issues, mobile app integration, and broader operating system support remain areas for development.

What are Cloudify's most important features?

Support for Major Cloud Providers: Integrates with AWS, Azure, VMware for streamlined deployments.
Template Following: Simplifies deploying infrastructure using standardized templates.
Orchestration Abilities: Manages complex operations efficiently across platforms.
Extensibility: Supports custom logic and plugins for specific requirements.
Infrastructure-as-Code: Provides high availability and easy management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Flexibility: Enhances the ability to deploy across different cloud platforms.
Integration: Facilitates seamless orchestration and management of resources.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces deployment time and simplifies workflows.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resources and minimizes redundant processes.
Customizability: Tailors deployments with custom logic to meet specific needs.

In industries like telecom, edge computing, and networking, Cloudify is essential for orchestrating complex deployments and infrastructure management. Organizations leverage its capabilities for CI/CD processes, system testing, and NVF-related tasks. It enables the deployment of REST applications, virtual machines, and private clouds using technologies like Tomcat, SaltStack, Kubernetes, and OpenStack, while communicating effectively with tools such as ServiceNow, PowerShell, Python, and PSQL.

Cloudify

Freshservice specializes in user-friendliness and seamless integration, facilitating IT operations with AI-driven ticketing and flexible asset management, essential for diverse organizations.

Known for its comprehensive automation and integration with platforms like AWS, Freshservice enhances IT tasks with flexible workflows and intuitive dashboards. Its self-service portal and effective incident management promote efficient service delivery and SLA compliance, making it vital for IT teams. However, users seek enhanced customization and integration with Microsoft and Google, along with improved analytics and project management features.

What are the essential features of Freshservice?

User-friendliness: Simplifies IT processes with intuitive design.
Comprehensive automation: Optimizes operations through streamlined processes.
AI-powered ticketing: Enhances ticket management with intelligent solutions.
Seamless integration: Connects with platforms like AWS and SolarWinds for efficient workflows.
Flexible workflows and asset management: Adapts to diverse IT needs for better service delivery.

What benefits should users consider in Freshservice reviews?

Streamlined IT operations: Simplifies and speeds up service processes.
Improved SLA compliance: Enhances adherence to service level agreements through efficient management.
Increased service delivery: Boosts the quality and efficiency of services provided.
Visibility across departments: Provides clear tracking and management of service requests and assets.

Freshservice is widely implemented in IT service management, supporting ticketing, incident management, and change management. It assists in customer service, internal support, and integrates with Azure and AWS. Significant for HR service centers and knowledge bases, it enables workflow automation and reporting, centralizing service operations for enhanced visibility and tracking across departments.

Freshworks

Sample Customers

Proximus Partner Communications (Israel) VMware NTT Data Metaswitch Spirent Communications Lumina Networks Atos Fortinet

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Western Carriers, Judson University, Golf Canada, Travix, Proxama, Paymentez, Ready Auto Transport

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. Freshservice

April 2026

Free Report: Cloudify vs. Freshservice

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudify vs. Freshservice and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudify vs. Freshservice report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.