Cloudify vs Freshservice comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cloudify and Freshworks are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cloudify is ranked #40, while Freshworks is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3. Cloudify holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Freshworks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Freshworks users who would recommend it.

Cloudify

Read 12 Cloudify reviews

2,253 Views
2,185 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Freshservice

Read 40 Freshservice reviews

11,001 Views
1,540 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cloudify

Freshservice

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Freshservice and Cloudify are competing in IT service management solutions, each offering unique capabilities. Freshservice has the upper hand in user satisfaction with strong customer support and affordable pricing, while Cloudify stands out with advanced features for complex cloud environments.

Features: Freshservice offers automated workflows, integrated asset management, and a service desk component. Cloudify provides multi-cloud orchestration, scalability, and infrastructure automation.

Room for Improvement: Freshservice could enhance its advanced customization capabilities, expand integration options, and improve scalability for larger enterprises. Cloudify might work on streamlining its user interface, simplifying its initial setup, and offering more comprehensive customer support for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Freshservice is known for easy deployment and responsive customer service, enabling quick implementation. Cloudify provides a customizable deployment process designed for intricate environments, allowing for flexibility in detailed configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Freshservice offers competitive pricing with quick ROI due to efficient onboarding and minimal setup costs, while Cloudify has a higher initial investment, delivering significant ROI through flexibility for complex infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudify vs. Freshservice Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. Freshservice

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudify

Ranking in Cloud Management

40th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Freshservice

Ranking in Cloud Management

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (8th), Project Management Software (12th), IT Asset Management (7th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Configuration Management Databases (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (14th), AI IT Support (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cloudify is 1.4%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Freshservice is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Freshservice	1.3%
Cloudify	1.4%
Other	97.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Ullas Soman

DevOps Consultant at Coforge Growth Agency

Great at enabling a single platform to communicate with an entire infrastructure.

The best feature of Cloudify is that it enables a single platform to communicate with the DB, with applications, and with the entire infrastructure. The product is very stable and has a lot of troubleshooting and analytical features. It's easy to understand and user-friendly. If you want to uninstall something, it's very easy to have the logic created in Cloudify. Other solutions don't have this. For example, if you wanted to decommission after three or four years, rather than going for a full decommission, it's possible to unallocate a particular space. If you want to allocate storage for a new build, it's very easy to deploy, uninstall and release some storage from the TOSCA.

Read full review

Raja Farrar

IT Service Delivery Manager at Symposiam

Automation and AI have transformed our service delivery and have made IT support faster and more efficient

I always keep up with Freshservice's roadmaps and new features. Freshservice has been very good at listening to feedback and adding those feature requests into their next iterations. I wish they would offer more granular data export options for utilizing in Power BI, along with predictive analytics for capacity planning and SLA breaches to enable more proactive support management and reduce firefighting. While the dashboards are effective, some users find custom reporting limited compared to ServiceNow or Jira. I would also appreciate deeper integrations, especially for niche apps requiring development coding work to enable advanced orchestration. Native integrations for DevOps pipelines such as GitHub Actions and Jenkins, along with stronger API flexibility for complex workflows, would enhance functionality. Although the CMDB and asset management are solid, they do lack advanced dependency mapping compared to other enterprise tools. My wishlist includes automated impact analysis for changes and improved visualization of asset relationships, enabling quicker resolutions from an agent's perspective when alerts come in. I acknowledge that Device42 may enhance this, but it is an extra cost beyond what we already pay. While Freddy AI is excellent for triage and suggestions, some users desire more proactive automation, such as predictive ticket routing based on historical patterns and AI-driven capacity forecasting. Lastly, the pricing tiers might seem rigid for mid-sized teams, so a more granular add-on option for features such as Device42 or pay-per-use for orchestration workflows could be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Valuable features are auto-scaling and load balancing."

"It's easy to create a cloud server, such as Linux with JBoss or WebSphere, which is good for continuous deployment."

"Cloudify provides the infrastructure-as-code, as well as operational action capabilities (orchestrated startups or upgrades, and more)."

"The best feature of Cloudify is that it enables a single platform to communicate with the DB, with applications, and with the entire infrastructure."

"The solution includes the option to run background scripts and processes from a connected API."

"No need to change the existing application code base."

"It has enabled us to create the DICE Deployment Service and simplified deployment of any other services (monitoring, continuous integration, etc.)."

"Product has given us the ability to catch early scaling issues that many companies hit on with private clouds."

More Cloudify pros

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the user experience."

"You can just register and within five to minute minutes, you are ready to go."

"We really like the Freshchat widget that allows people to engage with our FAQs on any kind of webpage or web property."

"My advice for others looking into using Freshservice is that it is a very great tool, as it saves your time, your money, and your team efforts."

"The most valuable features of Freshservice are the notifications, customization, and flexibility."

"I would recommend it if you're looking for a really quick way of getting your help desk up and running with a ticketing system and some pretty cool automation with emails, notifications, etc."

"The solution is very responsive with a 97% success rate in funneling customer tickets."

"Freshservice has automated a lot of our tasks, including ticket responses and call assignments, which has sped up our operations considerably."

More Freshservice pros

Cons

"There were some issues with deploying the solution on OpenStack Mitaka."

"Error handling could be improved; GUI is lacking with respect to user privileges and connectivity."

"It lacked the user interface for multitenancy and basic platform management tasks. It is a leader in the niche area that they like to perform in, but it only does about 30% of top-tier advanced functions of platform management. It doesn't meet about 70% of what you need to manage a private cloud platform."

"The solution could be improved with respect to error handling. If we want to troubleshoot further and deep dive, we don't have access to admin privileges to extract those errors."

"Install of the product itself could be improved and I would like to see better event monitoring."

"The solution is a bit of a headache because mistakes happen in the blueprint every time we deploy and they require modifications."

"Unlike the Docker environment, Cloudify takes time for configuration and its learning curve."

"Cloudify is not a turn-key solution, nor designed as such."

More Cloudify cons

"The automation workflows are powerful, but the UI can feel limited; once the workflows get complex, it becomes hard to visualize them."

"Sometimes, the billing process is an absolute nightmare."

"We haven't had any issues with the stability of Freshservice. However, we have had some issues with data imports, we have noticed that large amounts of data can get stuck. This is something that we haven't seen in other solutions."

"It is 80% stable. Some users face issues in Chrome and Firefox."

"It would be good to have the product integrated with Google because that's our corporate tool of choice."

"The ability to customize the user interface is a bit lacking, and the reporting is a bit lacking because they're very stringent upon what you can pull reporting-wise within Freshservice. They have a lot of built-in reports that are very nice, but when it comes to customizing these, they just provide you with certain data. When you try to build your own report wizard, you aren't able to go and select some of the data that is shown in some of the reports that come with Freshservice. This is something that we have brought up with our account representative, and we have suggested these as feature updates in the future. We're still waiting on them to go and implement something like that."

"You can't implement a complicated delivery workflow."

"I am not too happy with the page layout or screen layout since it always looks messy."

More Freshservice cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't involved in the pricing of it because we were just doing prototype work with it, but I was told by the upper management team that it was quite expensive. That was another reason we switched to Morpheus."

"I can't recall exactly how much we pay, but it is somewhere in the middle compared to the rest of the market. The more we purchase, the cheaper it becomes, and I think the solution offers good value for money."

"It is good for the price you pay. It has different plans. If you need all features, you need to go for a higher plan. Currently, with the second tier plan, you cannot completely separate the group of agents. So, the agent in each group can see another person's ticket. You also cannot modify the rules based on the viewable, readable stuff and cannot have a custom role in this plan. If you want to do that, you have to go for a higher plan. It works in our case because it doesn't matter if the other group can see our ticket because it doesn't contain anything sensitive. We also didn't need the project or change management features. That's why we didn't go with a higher plan."

"The solution may be around 20,000 euros a year."

"It is $34 per license, per agent. Currently, we don't see any add-ons at extra fees."

"The cost at the current timing is very reasonable but as the product gains popularity, I anticipate it might become expensive. Fortunately my customers have been offered a generous discount making it more affordable for me and satisfying both my needs and customers requirement."

"Compared to other tools, Freshservice is affordable."

"I don't think it's expensive for the US or some European markets. Still, when I used Freshservice in Mexico, some customers found it a bit pricey, especially considering the platform's features. I think the pricing is fair for use in the European market, but it might be perceived differently in Latin America."

"One of the key benefits of Freshservice is license management. Asset management has the possibility to keep track of licenses and that's very useful. The price of the solution is very good."

More Freshservice pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Freshservice?

I cannot comment much on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Freshservice as it was already preset up in my company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Freshservice?

I believe Freshservice can be improved by offering more advanced features and customizability. In terms of improvements, I suggest enhancing performance for larger networks and addressing workflow ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Freshservice?

In Freshservice, I typically use it for day-to-day tasks. A quick, specific example of how I use Freshservice in my daily work includes getting some incidents, working on service requests, and hand...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs Cloudify

Compared 8% of the time

Tieto OneCloud vs Cloudify

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudify

Compared 6% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudify

Compared 4% of the time

More Cloudify Competitors

ServiceNow vs Freshservice

Compared 10% of the time

Zendesk vs Freshservice

Compared 8% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Freshservice

Compared 6% of the time

Samanage vs Freshservice

Compared 4% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs Freshservice

Compared 3% of the time

More Freshservice Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify

September 2026

Download Cloudify product report

Buyer's Guide

Freshservice

September 2026

Download Freshservice product report

Also Known As

No data available

Flint

Overview

Cloudify offers seamless orchestration and infrastructure deployment across major cloud platforms such as AWS, Azure, and VMware. Its TOSCA-based standard provides flexibility and integration capabilities, making it an effective tool for multi-cloud operations and infrastructure-as-code management.

Cloudify's robust orchestration abilities are complemented by its ability to support major cloud providers and its ease of use in following templates. The extensibility through custom logic and plugins facilitates orchestrated startups, multi-cloud deployments, service chaining, and operational actions. Despite its strengths, users face challenges such as complex debugging, a steep learning curve when compared to Docker, and limited multitenancy features. There's a need for improvements in installation, event monitoring, error handling, simplified upgrades, and better plugin robustness. Connectivity issues, mobile app integration, and broader operating system support remain areas for development.

What are Cloudify's most important features?

Support for Major Cloud Providers: Integrates with AWS, Azure, VMware for streamlined deployments.
Template Following: Simplifies deploying infrastructure using standardized templates.
Orchestration Abilities: Manages complex operations efficiently across platforms.
Extensibility: Supports custom logic and plugins for specific requirements.
Infrastructure-as-Code: Provides high availability and easy management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Flexibility: Enhances the ability to deploy across different cloud platforms.
Integration: Facilitates seamless orchestration and management of resources.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces deployment time and simplifies workflows.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resources and minimizes redundant processes.
Customizability: Tailors deployments with custom logic to meet specific needs.

In industries like telecom, edge computing, and networking, Cloudify is essential for orchestrating complex deployments and infrastructure management. Organizations leverage its capabilities for CI/CD processes, system testing, and NVF-related tasks. It enables the deployment of REST applications, virtual machines, and private clouds using technologies like Tomcat, SaltStack, Kubernetes, and OpenStack, while communicating effectively with tools such as ServiceNow, PowerShell, Python, and PSQL.

Cloudify

Freshservice specializes in user-friendliness and seamless integration, facilitating IT operations with AI-driven ticketing and flexible asset management, essential for diverse organizations.

Known for its comprehensive automation and integration with platforms like AWS, Freshservice enhances IT tasks with flexible workflows and intuitive dashboards. Its self-service portal and effective incident management promote efficient service delivery and SLA compliance, making it vital for IT teams. However, users seek enhanced customization and integration with Microsoft and Google, along with improved analytics and project management features.

What are the essential features of Freshservice?

User-friendliness: Simplifies IT processes with intuitive design.
Comprehensive automation: Optimizes operations through streamlined processes.
AI-powered ticketing: Enhances ticket management with intelligent solutions.
Seamless integration: Connects with platforms like AWS and SolarWinds for efficient workflows.
Flexible workflows and asset management: Adapts to diverse IT needs for better service delivery.

What benefits should users consider in Freshservice reviews?

Streamlined IT operations: Simplifies and speeds up service processes.
Improved SLA compliance: Enhances adherence to service level agreements through efficient management.
Increased service delivery: Boosts the quality and efficiency of services provided.
Visibility across departments: Provides clear tracking and management of service requests and assets.

Freshservice is widely implemented in IT service management, supporting ticketing, incident management, and change management. It assists in customer service, internal support, and integrates with Azure and AWS. Significant for HR service centers and knowledge bases, it enables workflow automation and reporting, centralizing service operations for enhanced visibility and tracking across departments.

Freshworks

Sample Customers

Proximus Partner Communications (Israel) VMware NTT Data Metaswitch Spirent Communications Lumina Networks Atos Fortinet

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Western Carriers, Judson University, Golf Canada, Travix, Proxama, Paymentez, Ready Auto Transport

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. Freshservice

September 2026

Free Report: Cloudify vs. Freshservice

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudify vs. Freshservice and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudify vs. Freshservice report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.