Cloudify vs Freshservice comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Cloudify and Freshworks are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cloudify is ranked #39, while Freshworks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Cloudify holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Freshworks’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cloudify users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Freshworks users who would recommend it.

Cloudify

Read 12 Cloudify reviews

2,558 Views
2,430 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Freshservice

Read 40 Freshservice reviews

12,549 Views
1,757 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cloudify

Freshservice

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Freshservice and Cloudify are competing in IT service management solutions, each offering unique capabilities. Freshservice has the upper hand in user satisfaction with strong customer support and affordable pricing, while Cloudify stands out with advanced features for complex cloud environments.

Features: Freshservice offers automated workflows, integrated asset management, and a service desk component. Cloudify provides multi-cloud orchestration, scalability, and infrastructure automation.

Room for Improvement: Freshservice could enhance its advanced customization capabilities, expand integration options, and improve scalability for larger enterprises. Cloudify might work on streamlining its user interface, simplifying its initial setup, and offering more comprehensive customer support for non-technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Freshservice is known for easy deployment and responsive customer service, enabling quick implementation. Cloudify provides a customizable deployment process designed for intricate environments, allowing for flexibility in detailed configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Freshservice offers competitive pricing with quick ROI due to efficient onboarding and minimal setup costs, while Cloudify has a higher initial investment, delivering significant ROI through flexibility for complex infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloudify vs. Freshservice Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. Freshservice

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudify

Ranking in Cloud Management

39th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Freshservice

Ranking in Cloud Management

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (6th), Project Management Software (14th), IT Asset Management (7th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (7th), Configuration Management Databases (5th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (14th), AI IT Support (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cloudify is 1.4%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Freshservice is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Freshservice	1.3%
Cloudify	1.4%
Other	97.3%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Ullas Soman

DevOps Consultant at Coforge Growth Agency

Great at enabling a single platform to communicate with an entire infrastructure.

The best feature of Cloudify is that it enables a single platform to communicate with the DB, with applications, and with the entire infrastructure. The product is very stable and has a lot of troubleshooting and analytical features. It's easy to understand and user-friendly. If you want to uninstall something, it's very easy to have the logic created in Cloudify. Other solutions don't have this. For example, if you wanted to decommission after three or four years, rather than going for a full decommission, it's possible to unallocate a particular space. If you want to allocate storage for a new build, it's very easy to deploy, uninstall and release some storage from the TOSCA.

Read full review

Raja Farrar

IT Service Delivery Manager at Symposiam

Automation and AI have transformed our service delivery and have made IT support faster and more efficient

I always keep up with Freshservice's roadmaps and new features. Freshservice has been very good at listening to feedback and adding those feature requests into their next iterations. I wish they would offer more granular data export options for utilizing in Power BI, along with predictive analytics for capacity planning and SLA breaches to enable more proactive support management and reduce firefighting. While the dashboards are effective, some users find custom reporting limited compared to ServiceNow or Jira. I would also appreciate deeper integrations, especially for niche apps requiring development coding work to enable advanced orchestration. Native integrations for DevOps pipelines such as GitHub Actions and Jenkins, along with stronger API flexibility for complex workflows, would enhance functionality. Although the CMDB and asset management are solid, they do lack advanced dependency mapping compared to other enterprise tools. My wishlist includes automated impact analysis for changes and improved visualization of asset relationships, enabling quicker resolutions from an agent's perspective when alerts come in. I acknowledge that Device42 may enhance this, but it is an extra cost beyond what we already pay. While Freddy AI is excellent for triage and suggestions, some users desire more proactive automation, such as predictive ticket routing based on historical patterns and AI-driven capacity forecasting. Lastly, the pricing tiers might seem rigid for mid-sized teams, so a more granular add-on option for features such as Device42 or pay-per-use for orchestration workflows could be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Product has given us the ability to catch early scaling issues that many companies hit on with private clouds."

"Cloudify works in cases where you have very advanced service chaining requirements. It really works well there, and it fits the best. They have a standardized markup that's based on TOSCA, which is a standard. I like the fact that they're standards-based. Their solution works extremely well if you have the talent and the manpower to write TOSCA descriptors to deploy and interchange services or to automate the configuration and turn up of services."

"Cloudify provides the infrastructure-as-code, as well as operational action capabilities (orchestrated startups or upgrades, and more)."

"Has great extendability which means you can build your own custom logic."

"No need to change the existing application code base."

"We have found that this is not an undue burden, and the extra work gives immense flexibility and portability."

"TOSCA model allows modeling the application rather than the automation. It is a machine-readable representation of the application and its infrastructure, which can be used for other things too, not just for the orchestration (e.g. enterprise architecture big picture, who connects to whom)."

"Even with the learning curve, the solution is an interesting concept and reminds me of Vagrant Terraform with its own difficulties and easiness."

More Cloudify pros

"The most valuable features of Freshservice are the notifications, customization, and flexibility."

"All features explored in Freshservice have proven to be helpful in reducing workload and ticket redundancy."

"I would recommend it if you're looking for a really quick way of getting your help desk up and running with a ticketing system and some pretty cool automation with emails, notifications, etc."

"We really like the Freshchat widget that allows people to engage with our FAQs on any kind of webpage or web property."

"The portal is straightforward for the end-user, but that's not the best part of Freshservice; integration is the part that's interesting because it's easy to set up a process, it's extremely simple to integrate, and in one week, you can add change management, which is incredible."

"The stability is pretty solid; we've never had major outages or any workflow issues that weren't caused by an administrative error, and it's been pretty stable as far as a ticketing platform is concerned."

"It allowed the development team to concentrate on the client’s requirements instead."

"Due to our previous system being so poor, our ROI was effectively immediate as staff could easily log tickets via email, web, or over phone."

More Freshservice pros

Cons

"It lacked the user interface for multitenancy and basic platform management tasks."

"The upgrading process could be simplified."

"Unlike the Docker environment, Cloudify takes time for configuration and its learning curve."

"More of the debug functionality is needed; hopefully, we can pause during the server building process."

"Certainly the UI could use some intensive work, but nevertheless, overall, it’s a complete product with its 3.4 version and much better features are available with 4.0."

"There were some issues with deploying the solution on OpenStack Mitaka."

"I did encounter any issues with scalability."

"The solution is a bit of a headache because mistakes happen in the blueprint every time we deploy and they require modifications."

More Cloudify cons

"The product should look at BCM or ServiceNow and see if there are features that would make nice additions. It would help them stay competitive."

"There are some limitations in reporting. For example, I would like to have a report of conversations or replies."

"The ability to customize the user interface is a bit lacking, and the reporting is a bit lacking because they're very stringent upon what you can pull reporting-wise within Freshservice. They have a lot of built-in reports that are very nice, but when it comes to customizing these, they just provide you with certain data. When you try to build your own report wizard, you aren't able to go and select some of the data that is shown in some of the reports that come with Freshservice. This is something that we have brought up with our account representative, and we have suggested these as feature updates in the future. We're still waiting on them to go and implement something like that."

"Currently, we can have only one plan per subscription. All users have to be on the same plan."

"The most significant area for improvement is consistency across the different modules, as they are inconsistent. It makes me think the modules have different development teams with no consistent approach. From an end-user perspective, I can do certain operations in one module, such as instant management, but not in problem management, for example, and I don't see why that should be the case. It would be good to see more consistency in the development process."

"We did a review of our project management tool internally within the company, and it was one of the choices, but it didn't match up anywhere close to any of the other tools we were considering."

"Asset management can definitely be improved because it doesn't pick up every single device on the network or every single piece of information. Some manual information still needs to be entered."

"They're not very good at technical support."

More Freshservice cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't involved in the pricing of it because we were just doing prototype work with it, but I was told by the upper management team that it was quite expensive. That was another reason we switched to Morpheus."

"It is $34 per license, per agent. Currently, we don't see any add-ons at extra fees."

"Freshservice's licensing costs are pretty good, and it has different categories of pricing based on what modules and features you choose, which gives a lot of flexibility."

"Freshservice is a fairly cheap solution. Though monthly payments can be made towards the licensing costs of the solution, my company prefers to make annual payments."

"I can't recall exactly how much we pay, but it is somewhere in the middle compared to the rest of the market. The more we purchase, the cheaper it becomes, and I think the solution offers good value for money."

"It was a middle tier. It wasn't an expensive one. It was a tier model usage. Licensing costs varied between admin users and regular users."

"Compared to other tools, Freshservice is affordable."

"The price of Freshservice could improve, it is expensive."

"The solution may be around 20,000 euros a year."

More Freshservice pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Construction Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	16

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Freshservice?

I cannot comment much on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Freshservice as it was already preset up in my company.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Freshservice?

I believe Freshservice can be improved by offering more advanced features and customizability. In terms of improvements, I suggest enhancing performance for larger networks and addressing workflow ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Freshservice?

In Freshservice, I typically use it for day-to-day tasks. A quick, specific example of how I use Freshservice in my daily work includes getting some incidents, working on service requests, and hand...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Automation vs Cloudify

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs Cloudify

Compared 8% of the time

Tieto OneCloud vs Cloudify

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudify

Compared 6% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudify

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudify Competitors

ServiceNow vs Freshservice

Compared 9% of the time

Zendesk vs Freshservice

Compared 7% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Freshservice

Compared 5% of the time

Samanage vs Freshservice

Compared 4% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs Freshservice

Compared 3% of the time

More Freshservice Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify

October 2026

Download Cloudify product report

Buyer's Guide

Freshservice

October 2026

Download Freshservice product report

Also Known As

No data available

Flint

Overview

Cloudify offers seamless orchestration and infrastructure deployment across major cloud platforms such as AWS, Azure, and VMware. Its TOSCA-based standard provides flexibility and integration capabilities, making it an effective tool for multi-cloud operations and infrastructure-as-code management.

Cloudify's robust orchestration abilities are complemented by its ability to support major cloud providers and its ease of use in following templates. The extensibility through custom logic and plugins facilitates orchestrated startups, multi-cloud deployments, service chaining, and operational actions. Despite its strengths, users face challenges such as complex debugging, a steep learning curve when compared to Docker, and limited multitenancy features. There's a need for improvements in installation, event monitoring, error handling, simplified upgrades, and better plugin robustness. Connectivity issues, mobile app integration, and broader operating system support remain areas for development.

What are Cloudify's most important features?

Support for Major Cloud Providers: Integrates with AWS, Azure, VMware for streamlined deployments.
Template Following: Simplifies deploying infrastructure using standardized templates.
Orchestration Abilities: Manages complex operations efficiently across platforms.
Extensibility: Supports custom logic and plugins for specific requirements.
Infrastructure-as-Code: Provides high availability and easy management.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Flexibility: Enhances the ability to deploy across different cloud platforms.
Integration: Facilitates seamless orchestration and management of resources.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces deployment time and simplifies workflows.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resources and minimizes redundant processes.
Customizability: Tailors deployments with custom logic to meet specific needs.

In industries like telecom, edge computing, and networking, Cloudify is essential for orchestrating complex deployments and infrastructure management. Organizations leverage its capabilities for CI/CD processes, system testing, and NVF-related tasks. It enables the deployment of REST applications, virtual machines, and private clouds using technologies like Tomcat, SaltStack, Kubernetes, and OpenStack, while communicating effectively with tools such as ServiceNow, PowerShell, Python, and PSQL.

Cloudify

Freshservice specializes in user-friendliness and seamless integration, facilitating IT operations with AI-driven ticketing and flexible asset management, essential for diverse organizations.

Known for its comprehensive automation and integration with platforms like AWS, Freshservice enhances IT tasks with flexible workflows and intuitive dashboards. Its self-service portal and effective incident management promote efficient service delivery and SLA compliance, making it vital for IT teams. However, users seek enhanced customization and integration with Microsoft and Google, along with improved analytics and project management features.

What are the essential features of Freshservice?

User-friendliness: Simplifies IT processes with intuitive design.
Comprehensive automation: Optimizes operations through streamlined processes.
AI-powered ticketing: Enhances ticket management with intelligent solutions.
Seamless integration: Connects with platforms like AWS and SolarWinds for efficient workflows.
Flexible workflows and asset management: Adapts to diverse IT needs for better service delivery.

What benefits should users consider in Freshservice reviews?

Streamlined IT operations: Simplifies and speeds up service processes.
Improved SLA compliance: Enhances adherence to service level agreements through efficient management.
Increased service delivery: Boosts the quality and efficiency of services provided.
Visibility across departments: Provides clear tracking and management of service requests and assets.

Freshservice is widely implemented in IT service management, supporting ticketing, incident management, and change management. It assists in customer service, internal support, and integrates with Azure and AWS. Significant for HR service centers and knowledge bases, it enables workflow automation and reporting, centralizing service operations for enhanced visibility and tracking across departments.

Freshworks

Sample Customers

Proximus Partner Communications (Israel) VMware NTT Data Metaswitch Spirent Communications Lumina Networks Atos Fortinet

Sinclair Broadcast Group, Western Carriers, Judson University, Golf Canada, Travix, Proxama, Paymentez, Ready Auto Transport

Buyer's Guide

Cloudify vs. Freshservice

November 2026

Free Report: Cloudify vs. Freshservice

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudify vs. Freshservice and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cloudify vs. Freshservice report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.