CloudSphere vs OpenNebula comparison

CloudSphere and OpenNebula are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. CloudSphere is ranked #28 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenNebula is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.0. CloudSphere holds a 1.5% mindshare in CM, compared to OpenNebula’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CloudSphere users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenNebula users who would recommend it.

CloudSphere

Read 6 CloudSphere reviews

2,530 Views
1,645 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenNebula

Read 15 OpenNebula reviews

3,459 Views
3,286 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudSphere

OpenNebula

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

CloudSphere and OpenNebula are cloud management platforms vying in the competitive cloud management category. CloudSphere holds an edge in pricing and customer support satisfaction, while OpenNebula is favored for its advanced features and perceived value.

Features: CloudSphere offers multi-cloud governance, compliance automation, and robust policy management. OpenNebula stands out with its virtualization abilities, hybrid cloud orchestration, and extensive template configurations.

Room for Improvement: CloudSphere could enhance its interface simplicity, reduce dependency latency, and improve integration with more cloud platforms. OpenNebula may need better user-friendly documentation, simplified initial setup processes for non-experts, and expansion of its support services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudSphere ensures a streamlined deployment process complemented by strong customer support, aiding in quick initial setup. OpenNebula, while customizable and rapid in deployment, demands technical expertise for its configuration, appealing to users who prefer flexibility over simplicity.

Pricing and ROI: CloudSphere's competitive cost structure ensures a quicker ROI by mitigating compliance expenses. OpenNebula's pricing offers sustained ROI through its feature-rich setup that boosts long-term infrastructure adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudSphere vs. OpenNebula Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. OpenNebula

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudSphere

Ranking in Cloud Management

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (14th)

OpenNebula

Ranking in Cloud Management

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudSphere is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenNebula is 1.6%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenNebula	1.6%
CloudSphere	1.5%
Other	96.9%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Asad-Ali

Dev Ops Engineer at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Cloud security assessments have improved cost control and vulnerability management across clients

The alerting system could be explored further, as it would help users integrate the alerting system more effectively. Additionally, an AI feature would be beneficial, as AI is prevalent nowadays and could integrate into environments to help customers. I would particularly like to see the AI feature added to CloudSphere so it automatically integrates into our environment and generates comprehensive reports, which would decrease workload from the engineer's perspective. If CloudSphere integrates AI and guides users on which security compliance they need to follow, AI could automatically scan everything and provide a report stating which areas need improvement and what points require attention.

Read full review

FOURES Jean-Philippe

Products Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Reliable, simple to manage, and offers great technical support

The support of VXLAN fits with our network management. Thanks to this we can propose mixed solutions using virtual resources on OpenNebula and bare metal servers hosted in our facilities linked to each other on the sale network. This use case is very useful when some applications need bare metal power (Kubernetes workers, huge databases, AI models computations, et cetera). The cluster management is very useful for splitting our different clusters (mutual vs dedicated). We can manage deployments and capacity planning without pain. The API is also really simple and it helped us to develop the Terraform provider to manage OpenNebula like any other cloud infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When I started using CloudSphere, it wasn't mature, and it had multiple issues. For example, my team experienced server issues while using the solution, but recently, I noticed how much CloudSphere has improved. There used to be some latency issues with CloudSphere. It even gave error messages in the past when you select an option such as "the web server is not responding", but it has improved a lot, and now I don't get any errors from CloudSphere. What I like best about CloudSphere is that it has a lot of beneficial features, and it has a single pane for managing multi-cloud environments, which I find very helpful, and it's the main benefit you can get from CloudSphere."

"CloudSphere is a good solution that works well and can integrate with multiple clouds and manage all our customers."

"The product is helpful for the management, optimization, and utilization of resources."

"We do not need to install any appliances or any agents."

"To others, if a company is looking for a security vulnerability tool or governance and policy tools that help improve their environment, I would recommend CloudSphere because it is very helpful, easy to use, user interactive, and provides many functions and features."

"Provides multiple kinds of services for managing the clouds of multiple customers."

"For the customers I work with, it provides flexibility as far as storage is concerned, so it's security and access."

"CloudSphere is very mature and very effective."

More CloudSphere pros

"OpenNebula freed my customer from doing the maintenance operations of the servers because now that can be done by his clients."

"The live migration feature has been great and is something we use very often."

"It's easy to integrate OpenNebula with our IT systems."

"I also like the ability to build custom functions. I can define a function where I have two types of views and configure the dependencies. The virtual data centers concept allows me to define users. If a user wants to join certain kinds of machines, the host and the other user won't see them. It gives me the flexibility to define multiple views and data centers in one place."

"For our use case, we found the solution to be the best fit when dealing with infrastructure services."

"OpenNebula is easy to deploy and manage compared to other solutions like OpenStack."

"It has enabled us to decrease the optics by around 55 to 60%."

"What's best about OpenNebula that people like is that it's easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage. It's interesting because people choose OpenNebula over other solutions because of the ease of management."

More OpenNebula pros

Cons

"CloudSphere is not keeping up with the pace of the cloud and there are a number of services that can't be deployed using CloudSphere."

"One of the cons of this product is that it will not discover all the applications running."

"The alerting system could be explored further, as it would help users integrate the alerting system more effectively."

"When we start the scanning of, for example, 500 servers, it will not handle the scan. We need to differentiate the jobs - for example, one job for 100 servers, a second job for another 100 servers, et cetera."

"The solution must have a single management console for the resources and VMs."

"Their customer support leaves a lot to be desired. The standards are not that great."

"The next feature I would like to have full disclosure of what's being done with the data."

"The main issue I experienced from CloudSphere was recently resolved, but an area for improvement in the solution is that it lacks the functionality of migrating resources from one public cloud to another. If CloudSphere could provide that functionality, that would be very beneficial to users and companies."

"They should add more features like object storage."

"The protocol for clusterization is rough and doesn't work well."

"It should have a simple REST API like most other tools. It's the industry standard format. An XML-RPC API gives you an XML document that you have to convert and then do something with that. REST API endpoint provides outputs in a JSON document. I would also like to see support for user data or heat templates, which OpenStack offers, but OpenNebula doesn't have this yet."

"As with all enterprise software licensing, the pricing is not intuitive and must be negotiated; grandfathered contracts are better than anything offered today."

"An area for improvement in OpenNebula is the number of features it has. The solution doesn't have that many cloud features compared to other solutions. You'd say, "Okay, simplicity over a rich feature list?" Some say, "No, I need a big machine or a cloud interface for my customers to manage resources. I don't have to go and do it for them." Some people do it that way, and it works, but I'd like to improve the limited features in OpenNebula."

"The storage feature that they have is a bit confusing."

"Backup features are only available in the enterprise edition. The community version lacks a good solution for making backups."

"Hosting platforms are limited so the deployment process needs improvement."

More OpenNebula cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It depends on how that model will be used. It might be anywhere between $4 and $15 per license per month. It’s less expensive than other options."

"The product is very expensive."

"VRA is very expensive but OpenNebula is free."

"OpenNebula gives good value for money."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"OpenNebuoa has recently come up with a new subscription model that is economical and a lot of new customers are choosing this as it is an easy subscription model."

"We use the Community Edition, rather than the Enterprise Edition."

"The licensing for OpenNebula used to be free, but now it's no longer free. A customer contacted me asking to move to another provider because of the changes in the licensing terms for OpenNebula. I have no information on how much the OpenNebula license is because the customer pays for it, and I only do the integration."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for CloudSphere?

My company relies on security assessments and vulnerabilities in our cloud environment in Azure, so we scan using CloudSphere. We work in MSP and Azure MSP with multiple clients, using two tools: P...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CloudSphere?

To others, if a company is looking for a security vulnerability tool or governance and policy tools that help improve their environment, I would recommend CloudSphere because it is very helpful, ea...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudSphere?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Densify vs CloudSphere

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudSphere

Compared 8% of the time

Skytap Cloud vs CloudSphere

Compared 6% of the time

NTT Cloud Management Platform vs CloudSphere

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs CloudSphere

Compared 2% of the time

More CloudSphere Competitors

CloudStack vs OpenNebula

Compared 16% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs OpenNebula

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs OpenNebula

Compared 7% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs OpenNebula

Compared 5% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs OpenNebula

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenNebula Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere

August 2026

Download CloudSphere product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenNebula

July 2026

Download OpenNebula product report

Also Known As

HyperCloud

No data available

Overview

CloudSphere offers a unique multi-cloud management solution with features like attack path analysis, cost management, and predictive insights designed to enhance infrastructure reliability.

Providing an agent-less SaaS-based discovery tool, CloudSphere simplifies multi-cloud management with its single-pane interface, ensuring seamless data access in hybrid cloud environments. Its predictive insights and improved infrastructure reliability are valuable for both development and operational teams. However, it could improve in application management, real-time monitoring, and resource migration across clouds. Issues like inefficient large server scans and limitations in CI/CD integration and application discovery can be hindrances for some users.

What are CloudSphere's key features?

Attack Path Analysis: Identifies vulnerabilities to improve security.
Cost Management: Optimizes spending across cloud platforms.
Resource Optimization: Enhances operational efficiency using predictive insights.
Asset Discovery: Agent-less discovery tool assists in managing cloud resources.
Multi-Cloud Management: Single-pane interface aids in auditing and resource utilization.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Infrastructure Reliability: Predictive insights boost stability.
Improved Collaboration: Single-pane interface supports cross-cloud operations.
Risk Management: Attack path analytics bolster security measures.
Operational Efficiency: Cost management features refine cloud spending.

CloudSphere is widely used in DevOps to manage test development networks, monitor application behaviors, and assess risk levels. Ideal for those managing inventories across public clouds, it's found in hyper-converged infrastructures in industries like healthcare, supporting hospital management and integrated services.

CloudSphere

OpenNebula offers scalability, ease of deployment, and integration capabilities that enhance cloud management for enterprises. It supports both virtual and bare metal resources, providing a versatile cloud management experience.

OpenNebula provides a robust platform for building, managing, and automating private and public clouds. Its compatibility with platforms like VMware, KVM, and containers makes it ideal for businesses hosting virtual private clouds and deploying Kubernetes clusters. OpenNebula's API and SDK facilitate automation and integration, allowing organizations to connect with IT systems effectively. Despite its strengths, improvements in object storage, REST API integration, and UI enhancements are needed. The documentation can be disorganized, and users encounter challenges with upgrades and community support.

What are key OpenNebula features?

Scalability: Easily manage resources for growing cloud environments.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies cloud management tasks.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with IT systems using robust API and SDK.
Hypervisor Support: Works with multiple hypervisors and container platforms.

What benefits do users find in OpenNebula?

Efficiency: Streamlines cloud operations, reducing management complexities.
Versatility: Offers support for both virtual and bare metal resources.
Community and Documentation: Though needing improvement, provides valuable resources for users.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lightweight nature minimizes resource expenditure.

OpenNebula implementation spans industries where cloud automation and management are critical. Companies utilize OpenNebula for deploying private clouds and managing infrastructure. Its support for Kubernetes clusters is beneficial in tech-driven sectors, highlighting OpenNebula's adaptability to different operational needs.

OpenNebula

Sample Customers

Affymetrix, Bell Helicopter, Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, Porterville Unified School District, Interact for Health, VirtueCom, Warren Memorial Hospital, Front Porch, RMH Group, Meyers Nave, Intraworks, Information Technology, ETTE, Clackamas Community College

Akamai, BBC, Fermilab, Terradue, Surf Sara, Produban, Netways, ESA, China Mobile, BlackBerry, Deloitte, Fuze, Telefonica, Trivago, Nokia, Encore Tech, Beeks.

Buyer's Guide

CloudSphere vs. OpenNebula

August 2026

Free Report: CloudSphere vs. OpenNebula

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudSphere vs. OpenNebula and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudSphere vs. OpenNebula report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.