Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CMW Platform vs ELMA 365 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CMW Platform
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
59th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Project Management Software (32nd)
ELMA 365
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
41st
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
CRM (75th), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (59th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of CMW Platform is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ELMA 365 is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ELMA 3650.5%
CMW Platform0.4%
Other99.1%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Use CMW Platform?
Share your opinion
PT
A great ERP for medium and even small businesses
If one has experience in the ERP market, big brands like Microsoft require a lot of money over other platforms like Odoo. We can implement an on-premise model for some enterprise customers because it gives privacy and security. For other customers, we provide the cloud version. Currently, we recommend customers implement the ERP platform on the cloud environment because of the flexibility and scaling. I recommend that customers invest in a solution with the possibility of scaling in the future while providing many functions and features out of the box. In many ERPs we provide, although we would recommend ELMA as a default option for medium and even enterprise customers, they need bigger brands. ELMA 365 should be the second or third option for customers right now. I rate ELMA 365 a ten out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
37%
Financial Services Firm
27%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about ELMA 365?
A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELMA 365?
I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It's not so cheap and not so expensive.
What needs improvement with ELMA 365?
Our customers mention three main topics when they review our product. The first point of improvement is the cost, the second one is they want improved productivity, and the last point would be cent...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Comindware Project, Comindware Suite
ELMA BPM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adobe 4. ADP 5. Airbus 6. Allstate 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. AmerisourceBergen 10. ATT 11. Autodesk 12. Bank of America 13. Baxter International 14. Becton Dickinson 15. Boeing 16. Bristol-Myers Squibb 17. Cisco Systems 18. CocaCola 19. Comcast 20. ConocoPhillips 21. Constellation Brands 22. Dell 23. Eli Lilly and Company 24. ExxonMobil 25. FedEx 26. Ford Motor Company 27. General Electric 28. General Motors 29. Google 30. Honeywell 31. IBM 32. Intel
Air Astana, GS Nanotech, Kapital Bank, Mriya Resort & SPA, Obninskorgsintez, VestaBank, pwc, Zarubezhneft, lockobank, Rosatom
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, SAP and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: August 2025.
868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.