

Control-M and GoAnywhere MFT compete in the domain of enterprise IT solutions focusing on automation and file transfer management. Control-M has an edge in comprehensive orchestration, whereas GoAnywhere MFT focuses on secured data exchange.
Features: Control-M provides a robust solution for scheduling and automating processes on AS400, with support for cross-platform dependencies and valuable modules like file transfers and error handling. GoAnywhere MFT excels in facilitating secure data exchange and centralizing file transfer automation, with intuitive interfaces and workflow elimination for custom scripts.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve its output analysis, reporting, and cost efficiency, as well as enhance agent deployment and API functionalities. GoAnywhere MFT needs better cloud integration, improved connector support, and workflow debugging tools, with a more modern interface to handle heavy loads smoothly.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M offers various deployment models, including on-premises and hybrid cloud, with robust support. However, users seek more comprehensive assistance and responsiveness. GoAnywhere MFT provides flexibility in private cloud and on-premises environments, appreciated for cost-effectiveness and service support, though better response times are desired.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is noted for its high cost, often based on tasks or job counts, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations. While expensive, its features deliver significant ROI through efficiency and centralized control. GoAnywhere MFT offers a more affordable pricing model, seen as cost-effective by mid-sized businesses, despite separate charges for additional features. Both solutions offer value over time by reducing manual intervention and improving operational efficiencies.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
GoAnywhere can perform the work of three people, leading to a decrease in manpower needs for automation and file transfer.
There is a drastic improvement in time; at least a 50% to 60% improvement in terms of effort.
In terms of percentage, for the amount of volume we are doing with GoAnywhere MFT and its functionality, I would estimate it has provided about a 50% return in four years.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
It's not a situation where you raise a ticket and wait for 48 hours to get a response; it's immediate.
They not only help you resolve issues but also ensure that you feel comfortable managing them in the future.
We can also email them, so through live chat I asked my questions and they cleared them, providing good technical support.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
As the workload grows, it is possible to expand the environment and manage additional processes while still maintaining centralized monitoring and control.
The scalability is ten out of ten because it works effectively even with many users, large files, and a lot of data moving at once.
I would rate the scalability of GoAnywhere MFT as a ten.
Stability is excellent, downtime is rare, and even large files can be transferred completely without any problem.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
Regarding stability, I would give Control-M a ten.
In my experience, once workflows and jobs are properly configured, it runs reliably and handles scheduled processes consistently.
The stability of the application itself is excellent.
Stability is excellent, downtime is rare, and even large files can be transferred completely without any problem.
It works very well, especially when kept up to date.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
That's the only thing that could help if the application could log what caused the error for us to prevent it.
We had to reach out to GoAnywhere support, and they were quick to provide support within a day, so we were able to complete that use case.
when the application runs on a server and encounters problems, it doesn't provide detailed information on the server issues, which could help users troubleshoot better.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Azure is significantly more expensive.
There are approximately 30% to 40% savings.
It is cost-efficient.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
It provides multiple cipher options for HTTPS and SFTP protocols, utilizing AES-based algorithms for secure communication and data transfer.
I can produce reports for security and have full control over secure protocols allowed on the system, making it easy to comply with security standards such as Sarbanes-Oxley.
Before, we had to write scripts and manually update them to move data around, encrypt files, or rename files. Now we just use the GUI to set the modules for transfers, encryption, renaming, and copying, allowing us to set it and schedule it to run without any user interaction.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| GoAnywhere MFT | 9.9% |
| Control-M | 6.7% |
| Other | 83.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 38 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 151 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 61 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 42 |
Control-M, from BMC, provides robust orchestration capabilities for managing hybrid cloud workflows, available both on-premise and as a SaaS option. Control-M from BMC supports growing teams in automating and scheduling enterprise workload processes. Control-M serves as a versatile tool for businesses, enabling automation across diverse platforms like SAP, mainframes, and cloud environments. It simplifies job scheduling with an intuitive GUI and integrates with multiple applications and platforms. Users benefit from managed file transfers, role-based administration, and self-service portals, enhancing security and workflow management. While the platform offers comprehensive alerting, reporting, and batch impact management, feedback has highlighted areas for improvement such as more flexible job execution, enhanced reporting capabilities, and better integration with third-party tools. Additionally, licensing costs and support during upgrades are common concerns. Organizations value Control-M for its ability to facilitate secure file transfers and support business-critical operations, minimizing manual intervention and ensuring efficiency.
What are the key features of Control-M?
What benefits should you look for in Control-M reviews?
Control-M is instrumental in industries managing complex workflows and IT operations. In finance, it offers accurate real-time data processing. Supply chain sectors benefit from its orchestration capabilities to streamline operations and minimize disruption. IT departments leverage integration capabilities to optimize workflow processes, ensuring seamless application management.
GoAnywhere MFT offers an intuitive interface with advanced workflows, robust security, and seamless integration across platforms. It automates file transfers, supports multiple protocols, and ensures strong encryption and centralized management for secure and efficient data exchange.
GoAnywhere MFT provides automation for secure file transfers using SFTP, FTPS, and HTTPS protocols. It supports comprehensive logging, auditing, and threat protection. The platform's encryption and scalability enhance data exchange and operational efficiency in sectors like finance and healthcare. Users appreciate its integration capabilities with AWS, Azure, and Salesforce, reducing manual tasks and maintaining security with robust encryption through connectors.
What are GoAnywhere MFT's most important features?GoAnywhere MFT is widely implemented in industries like finance and healthcare for secure data transfers and workflow management. It simplifies internal processes and enhances communication between systems, integrating seamlessly with platforms such as AWS and Salesforce, thus ensuring speed and security.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.