Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
GoAnywhere MFT Logo

Top 10 GoAnywhere MFT Alternatives

Vendor: Fortra
4.4 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top GoAnywhere MFT Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to GoAnywhere MFT based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, webMethods.io, and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. GoAnywhere MFT surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive secure file transfer solutions, featuring centralized management, extensive security controls, and robust automation capabilities that streamline workflows and enhance data protection for organizations of all sizes.

Fortra Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortra, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Control-M
4.3 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Control-M
4.3 out of 5
Control-M excels in complex scheduling and cross-platform integrations, making it ideal for enterprises with diverse automation needs. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT offers streamlined, secure file transfers and data exchange, appealing to those prioritizing straightforward workflows and a user-friendly interface.
Download Control-M vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
Control-M involves significant setup costs, while GoAnywhere MFT offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Control-M involves significant setup costs, while GoAnywhere MFT offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
webMethods.io
4.0 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT excels in security features, advanced workflows, and reducing custom scripts, appealing for file transfer management. In comparison, webMethods.io stands out for business process integration, API development, and connectors, ideal for seamless communication between SaaS apps and legacy systems. Both offer significant positive ROI.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. webMethods.io Report
GoAnywhere MFT offers a cost-effective setup, while webMethods.io involves a higher initial cost, highlighting the budget differentiation.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT offers a cost-effective setup, while webMethods.io involves a higher initial cost, highlighting the budget differentiation.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite
4.3 out of 5
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite excels in complex integrations with stable, scalable functionality and ease of use. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT offers strong file transfer automation with robust security. SEEBURGER is ideal for integration, while GoAnywhere is favored for protocol handling and data exchange.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report
The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite incurs higher setup costs compared to GoAnywhere MFT. SEEBURGER typically involves a more complex initial implementation, whereas GoAnywhere offers a simpler, cost-effective setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite incurs higher setup costs compared to GoAnywhere MFT. SEEBURGER typically involves a more complex initial implementation, whereas GoAnywhere offers a simpler, cost-effective setup process.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Kiteworks
4.3 out of 5
Kiteworks appeals to compliance-focused industries with its secure sharing and collaboration features and lower costs. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT, with its automation and integration capabilities, suits complex IT environments, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive workflows despite a higher initial investment.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. Kiteworks Report
Kiteworks requires upfront setup costs, while GoAnywhere MFT offers a more flexible payment structure, making budgeting easier. Kiteworks is preferred for those investing in long-term solutions, whereas GoAnywhere MFT appeals to users seeking cost-effective initiation.
View comparison
Pricing
Kiteworks requires upfront setup costs, while GoAnywhere MFT offers a more flexible payment structure, making budgeting easier. Kiteworks is preferred for those investing in long-term solutions, whereas GoAnywhere MFT appeals to users seeking cost-effective initiation.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
IBM Sterling File Gateway
3.9 out of 5
IBM Sterling File Gateway focuses on high-capacity transfers and robust security, ideal for corporates needing protocol integration. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT emphasizes workflow automation and flexible deployment, appealing to those requiring extensive integration with diverse systems and enhanced configurable features.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. IBM Sterling File Gateway Report
IBM Sterling File Gateway incurs higher setup costs compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which offers a more affordable initial expense, making it budget-friendly for smaller enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Sterling File Gateway incurs higher setup costs compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which offers a more affordable initial expense, making it budget-friendly for smaller enterprises.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
MOVEit
4.1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
MOVEit
4.1 out of 5
MOVEit excels in handling large file transfers and robust security, appealing to those prioritizing speed and traceability. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT offers comprehensive workflow capabilities and integration options, making it ideal for businesses seeking automated processes and seamless system connectivity.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. MOVEit Report
MOVEit setup costs involve a higher upfront payment compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which often provides more flexible, lower initial pricing options. This difference underscores contrasting financial approaches between the two file transfer solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
MOVEit setup costs involve a higher upfront payment compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which often provides more flexible, lower initial pricing options. This difference underscores contrasting financial approaches between the two file transfer solutions.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct
4.1 out of 5
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct leads in robust security and large-file transfer for traditional IT environments. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT offers flexible deployment and comprehensive support, making it a cost-effective choice for modern integration needs.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct Report
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct has higher setup costs, contrasting with GoAnywhere MFT's more affordable initial investment. This significant difference may impact initial budgeting considerations between the two options.
View comparison
Pricing
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct has higher setup costs, contrasting with GoAnywhere MFT's more affordable initial investment. This significant difference may impact initial budgeting considerations between the two options.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
ActiveBatch by Redwood
4.6 out of 5
ActiveBatch offers extensive workload automation and scheduling with strong integration capabilities and adaptability across enterprises. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT prioritizes secure managed file transfer with encryption and centralized data exchange. Tech buyers appreciate ActiveBatch's automation depth and GoAnywhere's robust security and workflow management.
Download ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
ActiveBatch by Redwood typically involves higher setup costs, while GoAnywhere MFT offers more budget-friendly implementation options, highlighting a cost advantage for organizations with tighter budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
ActiveBatch by Redwood typically involves higher setup costs, while GoAnywhere MFT offers more budget-friendly implementation options, highlighting a cost advantage for organizations with tighter budgets.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Aspera Managed File Transfer
3.8 out of 5
Aspera Managed File Transfer attracts cost-conscious buyers with lower startup expenses and rapid deployment using its FASP protocol. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT offers extensive features like encryption and automation, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive functionality and integration despite higher initial costs.
Download Aspera Managed File Transfer vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
Aspera Managed File Transfer's setup costs are moderate, focusing on reliability, while GoAnywhere MFT features flexible pricing, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Aspera Managed File Transfer's setup costs are moderate, focusing on reliability, while GoAnywhere MFT features flexible pricing, appealing to budget-conscious users.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
VisualCron
4.5 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
VisualCron
4.5 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT offers comprehensive workflows, eliminating custom scripts and enhancing security and integration capabilities. In comparison, VisualCron provides user-friendly job scheduling with visual tools and efficient database connectivity. GoAnywhere excels in workflow capabilities, while VisualCron simplifies operations without programming requirements.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. VisualCron Report
GoAnywhere MFT has a higher setup cost compared to VisualCron, which offers a more economical setup.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT has a higher setup cost compared to VisualCron, which offers a more economical setup.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer
4.4 out of 5
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer excels in integration with automation and security features like encryption. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT focuses on secure file transfers with advanced encryption and flexible licensing. BMC suits complex scenarios, while GoAnywhere offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Download BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has a cost-effective setup process, whereas GoAnywhere MFT involves higher initial expenses. The differences highlight varying affordability and budget considerations between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer has a cost-effective setup process, whereas GoAnywhere MFT involves higher initial expenses. The differences highlight varying affordability and budget considerations between the two solutions.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer
3.9 out of 5
Axway AMPLIFY MFT targets complex enterprise integration, while GoAnywhere MFT stands out for user-friendly security features. In comparison, GoAnywhere offers streamlined deployment and responsive support, whereas Axway involves more technical setup. Axway suits larger firms needing integration, while GoAnywhere benefits cost-conscious smaller organizations.
Download Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer incurs significant setup costs, whereas GoAnywhere MFT offers a lower-cost setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer incurs significant setup costs, whereas GoAnywhere MFT offers a lower-cost setup.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
JSCAPE by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
JSCAPE by Redwood
4.5 out of 5
JSCAPE by Redwood excels in managed file transfer with high availability clustering and security. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT offers advanced workflow automation. Tech buyers might choose JSCAPE for robust protocol support or GoAnywhere for its intuitive project automation and workflow features.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. JSCAPE by Redwood Report
JSCAPE by Redwood has a straightforward setup cost, while GoAnywhere MFT offers a more complex pricing model that influences initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
JSCAPE by Redwood has a straightforward setup cost, while GoAnywhere MFT offers a more complex pricing model that influences initial setup expenses.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
CA XCOM Data Transport
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT is ideal for its competitive pricing, automated workflows, and user-friendly setup. In comparison, CA XCOM Data Transport offers robust features like high-speed transfers and cross-platform interoperability, appealing to those valuing performance and long-term strategic investment despite higher initial costs.
GoAnywhere MFT typically incurs lower setup costs compared to CA XCOM Data Transport, providing a more budget-friendly initial investment for businesses. Conversely, CA XCOM may involve higher upfront costs that could impact budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT typically incurs lower setup costs compared to CA XCOM Data Transport, providing a more budget-friendly initial investment for businesses. Conversely, CA XCOM may involve higher upfront costs that could impact budget-conscious organizations.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
TIBCO Managed File Transfer
3.8 out of 5
TIBCO Managed File Transfer, known for its integration and security, attracts cost-conscious users. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT's comprehensive features and ease of deployment appeal to those valuing versatility and long-term ROI despite higher initial costs, with robust support enhancing customer satisfaction.
Download GoAnywhere MFT vs. TIBCO Managed File Transfer Report
TIBCO Managed File Transfer has a higher setup cost compared to GoAnywhere MFT. While TIBCO's features may justify its cost, GoAnywhere provides a budget-friendly setup option with comparable functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
TIBCO Managed File Transfer has a higher setup cost compared to GoAnywhere MFT. While TIBCO's features may justify its cost, GoAnywhere provides a budget-friendly setup option with comparable functionality.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Flux
5.0 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Flux
5.0 out of 5
Flux offers competitive pricing and advanced scheduling, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT excels with robust security and integration, attracting those needing comprehensive features. Flux provides straightforward deployment, while GoAnywhere MFT's advanced functionality supports more complex enterprise requirements despite higher initial costs.
Download Flux vs. GoAnywhere MFT Report
Flux has higher initial setup costs compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Flux has higher initial setup costs compared to GoAnywhere MFT, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
OpenText Data Integrator
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT offers secure file transfer, workflow automation, and compliance, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, OpenText Data Integrator provides superior integration and scalability, which might attract enterprises needing comprehensive features and willing to invest in advanced capabilities.
GoAnywhere MFT has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while OpenText Data Integrator involves a more complex setup that increases initial expenses. GoAnywhere offers a budget-friendly entry point, opposite to OpenText's higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while OpenText Data Integrator involves a more complex setup that increases initial expenses. GoAnywhere offers a budget-friendly entry point, opposite to OpenText's higher upfront investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Aspera On Demand
1 out of 5
Aspera On Demand excels in high-speed data transfer with its cloud-based model offering quick deployment. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT supports extensive protocols and automation. Aspera is cost-effective for large data transfers, while GoAnywhere's security features suit enterprises needing robust compliance.
Aspera On Demand offers low setup costs, making it accessible, whereas GoAnywhere MFT requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust feature set. This cost disparity highlights a significant difference in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Aspera On Demand offers low setup costs, making it accessible, whereas GoAnywhere MFT requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust feature set. This cost disparity highlights a significant difference in their pricing strategies.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
3.5 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT excels in data integration and compliance, making it ideal for secure exchanges with third parties. In comparison, SolarWinds Serv-U offers a straightforward interface and rapid deployment, appealing to organizations seeking quick implementation and ease of use.
GoAnywhere MFT's setup cost is higher but offers more advanced features, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server has a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT's setup cost is higher but offers more advanced features, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server has a lower setup cost, making it a budget-friendly option.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
WingFTP Managed File Transfer
1 out of 5
WingFTP Managed File Transfer excels in pricing and personalized support, making it ideal for businesses seeking cost-efficient solutions with strong security. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT's extensive features and automation appeal to organizations with complex needs, providing long-term value despite higher initial costs.
WingFTP Managed File Transfer has a lower setup cost compared to GoAnywhere MFT, highlighting an affordability advantage. On the other hand, GoAnywhere MFT's higher setup investment may imply additional features or capabilities not present in WingFTP.
View comparison
Pricing
WingFTP Managed File Transfer has a lower setup cost compared to GoAnywhere MFT, highlighting an affordability advantage. On the other hand, GoAnywhere MFT's higher setup investment may imply additional features or capabilities not present in WingFTP.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Thru
4.0 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Thru
4.0 out of 5
Thru offers cost-effective pricing and efficient support with secure email capabilities, appealing to businesses seeking tailored solutions. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT is known for comprehensive automation and advanced security, making it suitable for environments needing extensive compliance and robust feature sets.
Thru offers a straightforward setup cost, while GoAnywhere MFT presents a more complex initial investment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Thru offers a straightforward setup cost, while GoAnywhere MFT presents a more complex initial investment.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT offers extensive protocol support and integration, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS provides AWS-native features with easier deployment. GoAnywhere MFT suits diverse ecosystems, while Thorn appeals to AWS-focused organizations with its cloud-native functionality.
GoAnywhere MFT involves a higher setup cost compared to Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS, making it a more expensive option upfront. In contrast, Thorn SFTP Gateway offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, appealing to cost-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT involves a higher setup cost compared to Thorn SFTP Gateway for AWS, making it a more expensive option upfront. In contrast, Thorn SFTP Gateway offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, appealing to cost-conscious organizations.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
MetaDefender Vault
1 out of 5
MetaDefender Vault offers comprehensive security and compliance features for data protection, making it suitable for sensitive data needs. In comparison, GoAnywhere MFT excels with automation and reporting, offering businesses streamlined file transfers and robust customer support, although it may require a higher initial investment.
MetaDefender Vault has lower setup costs, making it a cost-effective choice, whereas GoAnywhere MFT demands higher initial investment, highlighting a disparity in expense entry requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
MetaDefender Vault has lower setup costs, making it a cost-effective choice, whereas GoAnywhere MFT demands higher initial investment, highlighting a disparity in expense entry requirements between the two solutions.
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
GoAnywhere MFT Logo
SolarWinds Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server
1 out of 5
GoAnywhere MFT offers advanced features and flexibility, ideal for complex environments, while SolarWinds Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server stands out for ease of deployment and lower costs. In comparison, SolarWinds suits smaller enterprises needing straightforward processes, whereas GoAnywhere appeals to larger organizations requiring extensive customization.
GoAnywhere MFT offers a competitive setup cost, while SolarWinds Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server may have a higher initial expense, highlighting distinct pricing strategies for businesses considering cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
GoAnywhere MFT offers a competitive setup cost, while SolarWinds Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server may have a higher initial expense, highlighting distinct pricing strategies for businesses considering cost efficiency.

Related categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Process Automation
Workload Automation