No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GoAnywhere MFT vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GoAnywhere MFT
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SolarWinds Serv-U File Tran...
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
26th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of GoAnywhere MFT is 7.1%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is 1.3%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GoAnywhere MFT7.1%
SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server1.3%
Other91.6%
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
 

Featured Reviews

Anuj Bhagwat - PeerSpot reviewer
Dev Ops Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Has enabled secure, centralized file sharing while saving significant time and resources
The best features in GoAnywhere MFT are that it's fast, reliable, and secure. First, the improvement is that we have resolved one of our security points with compliance. So that compliance point we resolved. And also it's a centralized file sharing system. All the users are able to access the file. There is no one-to-one sharing. It's improved about 80 to 85%. It saves about 80 to 90% resources. In terms of time, we can say 90 to 95% time is also saved because it avoids the one-to-one sharing and simply a user can put one centralized directory and all the users are able to access this solution and access the file. So it's 95%.
reviewer2292672 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Analyst at a integrator with 51-200 employees
The solution can be used for internal file transfer, but its technical support and third-party integrations should be improved
I am comparing SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, WS_FTP, and Wing FTP for my current company. We use the solution for multiple purposes, and it should be user-friendly when integrating something. We cannot always depend on the support team to come and fix the issues. Overall, I rate SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The automation capabilities are amazing. They help to reduce manual transfer tasks and handle the daily repetitive tasks that we do. It also ensures overall efficiency."
"GoAnywhere MFT is easier and more stable than IBM Sterling, and it is also more enterprise-friendly."
"We like that GoAnywhere helps to centralize the exchange of data among our systems, employees, and customers."
"Over the time we have had it, and given the things we have been able to do with it, it has paid for itself."
"We are the core users in our organization that use this application to transfer files between organizations in a secure manner, protecting data at rest and data in transit."
"It was very stable compared to other solutions we have used, so I would not complain regarding this."
"It streamlines the files. Anyone can go pick up the file that we give access to. It is great."
"GoAnywhere MFT is very scalable, I have integrated it with Amazon S3 and am working to integrate it with REST APIs as well, database integration was also very easy, I have an on-site, on-premises SFTP setup and that integration works very well, scalability is very good, and I am able to accomplish what we need."
"We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer."
 

Cons

"The support desk has room for improvement. I keep opening tickets and they keep telling me that they're closed, but they're not resolved."
"I think GoAnywhere MFT can improve in UI/UX redesigning and better cloud-native deployments."
"To improve GoAnywhere MFT, the UI could be more modern and some advanced workflow configurations and troubleshooting steps could be made easier for administrators."
"GoAnywhere MFT can be improved as the UI could be more modern, and some advanced workflow configurations and troubleshooting steps could be much easier for administrators."
"In terms of scalability, I would rate it around five, as it needs further scaling. The interface built should be more stable, as performance varies across different browsers and deployed versions."
"Scalability is around 7.5 for GoAnywhere MFT because there are restrictions based on file sizes for transfers, necessitating chunking to move complete files, which limits its effectiveness in data migration."
"Fortra needs to offer more use cases for GoAnywhere MFT during training."
"Maintenance does require some effort on my end."
"The solution’s technical support should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For what we pay to GoAnywhere every year, we are getting a fantastic deal. From a dollar perspective, it provides very good value."
"I find it to be very fair. It is very good."
"HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT is very reasonably priced for the value it brings."
"It is very attractive. In terms of the capacity of the product and functionality, it is a good price."
"Licensing can be expensive and it depends upon which features you want to buy."
"The product's pricing is reasonable."
"The pricing is not favorable when we use it for a few people."
"I get the invoices, and its price is fine and appropriate. It is well priced. Even if it was double the price, we'd use it. For us, it is indispensable. We're not going to go anywhere else. There are no additional costs. Its licensing is good. There is just one charge that we get. That's it."
"The pricing of the solution is INR 3,00,000."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business116
Midsize Enterprise38
Large Enterprise59
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good overall.
What needs improvement with Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT?
I believe GoAnywhere MFT could be improved with a better UI regarding user-to-user file sharing; one of the most requested features is related to user collaboration. Currently, if I share a Word do...
What is your primary use case for Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT?
My main use case for GoAnywhere MFT is managed file transfer for both user-to-user based file transfer and automation-based file transfer, where we automatically transfer files between one source s...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT, GoAnywhere MFT, GoAnywhere Managed File Transfer,
Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

McKesson City of Modesto, California Kwik Trip Northwestern University Charter Communications
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra, BMC, Progress Software and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: October 2026.
920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.