Control-M and OpenText Operations Orchestration are competitive products in the realm of automation and orchestration. Control-M tends to have the upper hand due to its advanced scheduling and predictive analytics features, whereas OpenText Operations Orchestration offers superior integration flexibility, making it more adaptable in diverse environments.
Features: Control-M's valuable features include advanced job scheduling, comprehensive reporting, and predictive analytics which enhance operational efficiency. It supports various platforms and provides excellent error handling and forecasting utilities. OpenText Operations Orchestration offers custom workflows, supports broad integrations, and features a scalable architecture suitable for complex settings.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could enhance its user interface for even greater ease of use and reduce learning curves for new users. It might also benefit from expanding its integration with emerging technologies and cloud-native tools. OpenText Operations Orchestration could improve its automatic failover capabilities, offer better reporting features, and enhance its high-availability support to ensure uninterrupted operations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M offers both straightforward on-premises and cloud deployment options complemented by proactive customer support, noted for quick response times. OpenText Operations Orchestration features flexible deployment models including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid solutions. Its versatile deployment options increase adaptability, while efficient support ensures quick resolutions to inquiries.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M's pricing structure is an upfront investment that generally offers a high ROI through efficient operation and reduced costs. It provides a predictable cost model advantageous for budget planning. OpenText Operations Orchestration may present lower initial setup costs but often requires additional investments as operational complexity develops. Its pricing could offer long-term investment opportunities depending on scalability requirements.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
It has reduced the total cost of ownership by 30% to 40%.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
If something fails at 3 AM in the morning, you need to fix it and get it back up and working really quickly.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
The stability of the Helix Control-M solution is good.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
There should be an automation system for developers to set it up more easily and quickly.
What they've done about scheduling, other people are still trying to figure out.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
The best cell phone will always be more expensive.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
Control-M by BMC offers orchestration for hybrid cloud workflows, starting at $29,000 annually. It's designed for teams managing dependencies efficiently with automation and scheduling capabilities.
Control-M is known for its automation, integration, and scheduling capabilities. It provides a user-friendly GUI for seamless third-party application integration and robust file transfer capabilities. Role-based administration features, self-service portals, and the ability to handle complex workflows enhance operational efficiency. Its control modules enable diverse integrations, while forecasting, monitoring, and alerting functionalities improve reliability and adaptability across platforms, making it essential for orchestrating tasks efficiently.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is vital in industries like financial services, data management, and IT operations. It automates batch processing, job automation, and file transfers, supporting applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Informatica. This enhances transparency, reduces errors, and provides insights into job performance and system status.
OpenText Operations Orchestration (OO) automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automate using low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrate with an API rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows.
With OO you can automate and orchestrate infrastructure automation and IT processes from service fulfillment to incident remediation, cloud service delivery, and disaster recovery.
Operations Orchestration offers the tools needed to provide enterprise wide orchestration capabilities:
Operations Orchestration offers the following components:
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
