OpenText Operations Orchestration vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

OpenText and ServiceNow are both solutions in the Process Automation category. OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5, while ServiceNow is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 1.0% mindshare in PA, compared to ServiceNow’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Read 26 OpenText Operations Orchestration reviews

1,468 Views
661 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

ServiceNow Orchestration

Read 16 ServiceNow Orchestration reviews

2,099 Views
2,057 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OpenText Operations Orchest...

ServiceNow Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

OpenText Operations Orchestration and ServiceNow Orchestration are key competitors in IT automation. While ServiceNow offers superior integration with systems, OpenText stands out for handling complex workflows efficiently.

Features: OpenText Operations Orchestration offers advanced scripting capabilities, flexible workflow management, and agent-based or agentless automation. ServiceNow Orchestration provides seamless integration with the ServiceNow platform, strong AI-driven features, and efficient service mapping capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve its user interface, streamlined integration options, and reduce the complexity of flow creation. ServiceNow Orchestration requires enhancements in network connectivity testing, better management scalability, and simplification of non-API features usage.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ServiceNow Orchestration benefits from effortless deployment within its ecosystem and centralized support. OpenText Operations Orchestration, while initially complex, offers personalized support and a vast library of resources for troubleshooting efforts.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Operations Orchestration demands a higher initial setup cost but delivers high ROI on complex operations. ServiceNow Orchestration may have reduced upfront costs, especially for current ServiceNow users, providing quick ROI through its integrated structure.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Ranking in Process Automation

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (22nd)

ServiceNow Orchestration

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of OpenText Operations Orchestration is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Orchestration is 3.0%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ServiceNow Orchestration	3.0%
OpenText Operations Orchestration	1.0%
Other	96.0%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Increases productivity with automation and robust orchestration capabilities

The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available. There are ready-made workflows, integration with other products, a nice user interface, and reporting. The tool is flexible, agent-based or agentless. It allows significant automation and has robust orchestration and reporting capabilities. It is easy to configure and use, leading to increased efficiency across our IT processes.

Read full review

Claude-Yameogo

Consultant at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has helped orchestrate processes and integrate workflows across cloud environments

I recommend ServiceNow Orchestration for larger companies because they have the capability to manage complex environments where it performs better. I promote low-code solutions for these implementations. I don't currently have an idea regarding the pre-built integrations of ServiceNow Orchestration, but I plan to check my area to determine what added value it can bring. I would rate this solution a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In my environment, if I want to shut down all tools in one shot, I can create a workflow and run the workflow to shut down all tools in one go."

"It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options."

"It's very stable. If you ask me for the success rate metrics, it's more than 90% for both."

"The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available."

"The product is good functionality-wise. I am impressed with the tool's flexibility in customization."

"The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in languages like Java. But along with that, there are limitation in terms of network connectivity testing and administrator faces regular challenges in conducting connectivity tests due to these limitations."

"Orchestration is commonly utilized by major corporations. The process of linking methods in ServiceNow, known as the RTS chain to parent methods, is executed seamlessly and efficiently. It's quite impressive and significant in its impact."

"Great with IT processes and business processes."

"The product has a flexible interface for development."

"Provisioning of new systems is among the most impactful features for automating complex workflows with ServiceNow Orchestration."

"It's scalable."

"I use it to orchestrate processes and integration features to gather and update data during specified timeframes or exchange data in real-time when changes occur based on certain criteria."

More ServiceNow Orchestration pros

Cons

"Only the tool's support can be a drawback where improvements are needed."

"There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues."

"The tool's UI needs to be improved. It needs to have better administration features in future releases."

"I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios."

"The price is an area that should be addressed because the price is high."

"There should be connectors to cover at least the top industry applications, and they should be easier to configure in a plug-and-play fashion."

"If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration."

"Efficiency of some features could be improved."

"There is still room for more integrations. Or, it would be nice to bundle multiple products together rather than selling everything as a model as that turns out to be a bit costly."

"If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration."

"It is a highly complex platform to work on."

"The third-party integrations are challenging when the tools are not from ServiceNow partners. This presents issues when integrating solutions from other vendors."

"There can be gaps in integration."

More ServiceNow Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product."

"The cost is very high compared to anything else available."

"The tool is expensive. I rate the tool a six if one is cheap and ten is very expensive."

"In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."

"It is not very expensive."

"The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."

"ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."

"This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."

"The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."

"It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."

"Pricing is custom to every customer."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Operations Orchestration?

The pricing is medium, and the automation helps in cost and time savings, resulting in substantial value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Operations Orchestration?

I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios. This would save time by not starting from scratch each time.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Operations Orchestration?

This tool serves as a central management hub, allowing seamless control of various IT processes via one console. I rate this solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about ServiceNow Orchestration?

The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in l...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Orchestration?

The cost of ServiceNow Orchestration is considered medium; it is expensive but powerful. I would rate the pricing experience as a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ServiceNow Orchestration?

If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration. Boomi is an ESB with orchestration features to integrate and exchange dat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Perpetuuiti Platform vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

Control-M vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

C TWO vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Operations Orchestration Competitors

Camunda vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 27% of the time

Control-M vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 14% of the time

Temporal vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

BIC Process Execution vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 4% of the time

More ServiceNow Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Orchestration

January 2026

OpenText Operations Orchestration report

Download OpenText Operations Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

ServiceNow Orchestration

January 2026

Download ServiceNow Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Orchestration, Operations Orchestration, HPOO, HPE Operations Orchestration

No data available

Overview

OpenText Operations Orchestration (OO) automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automate using low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrate with an API rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows.

With OO you can automate and orchestrate infrastructure automation and IT processes from service fulfillment to incident remediation, cloud service delivery, and disaster recovery.

Operations Orchestration offers the tools needed to provide enterprise wide orchestration capabilities:

Design automation workflows with a low-code/no-code designer canvas, content library, and API generator wizards.
Govern your automation in one place and centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows in large, high availability environments.
Schedule workflows and make sure that SLAs are met and workflows execution happens when you need it.
Expose REST APIs to programmatically invoke orchestration from any external source.
Automate difficult interfaces with RPA robots that mimic screen based human actions.
Follow business and operational metrics to understand the value and the health of your orchestration environment.
Expose orchestration scenarios as services to your end users in an easy to use Self-Service catalog.

Operations Orchestration offers the following components:

OpenText

ServiceNow is the fastest-growing enterprise cloud software company in the world above $1 billion (2018 revenue was $2.6 billion, up 36% year over year). We deliver digital workflows that create great experiences and unlock productivity to approximately 5,400 enterprise customers worldwide, including almost 75% of the Fortune 500.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

Casablanca INT, Internet Initiative Japan, Railway Information Systems, Samsung SDS, and Turkcell.

experian, BEACHBODY, HealthPartners, Banosoft

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

February 2026

Free Report: OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. ServiceNow Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Operations Orchestration vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.