

Control-M and Tines compete in automation tools, specifically in enterprise workflow management. Control-M stands out with its extensive integration capabilities and support for complex applications, while Tines has an edge with its intuitive, no-code approach, offering simplicity and flexibility for automated security workflows.
Features: Control-M enhances enterprise workflow optimization through robust job scheduling, extensive application integration, and advanced analytics. It supports complex scheduling and cross-platform capabilities. Tines provides no-code automation, streamlining security operations and offering effective integration with security tools. Its focus is on ease of use and flexibility in automation.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve by simplifying its user interface and reducing the complexity of deployment, which may require significant expertise and resources. It could also offer more cost-effective solutions for smaller enterprises. Tines could expand its integration capabilities beyond security-focused tools and add more advanced analytics features to better compete with comprehensive workflow managers.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M, while thorough, involves an intricate deployment process needing significant resources and technical expertise, though it provides robust support channels. Tines simplifies deployment with a user-friendly platform and quick, responsive support, enhancing user experience.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M's setup costs can be high, promising returns over time for larger enterprises with complex needs. Tines, with a more affordable entry point, offers quicker ROI, appealing to smaller teams eager to optimize security operations rapidly. Tines's pricing makes it a sensible choice for those needing a cost-effective solution with agility.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
I can speak for fewer employees needed because we used to require many analysts to deal with all the alerts that we were generating, but now we have about 90 to 95% of the alerts already automated through Tines, which requires tremendous time saved and a ton of reduction in the number of analysts required.
In some domains, we were in a position to actually let go of people, meaning at least two people have been reduced from one team, which saves a lot of cost for the organization.
We did not see proper value in it, whereas other platforms would have given much higher value for us.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
Even when we were new to Control-M, they assisted us greatly with any integration issues or other concerns.
Whenever we hit roadblocks or issues with the platform or story, even if it was our mistake, the people from the most senior engineering team of Tines immediately were willing to get on call with us.
I would rate the customer support a ten on a scale of one to ten.
The support and engineering team is quick to resolve bugs and respond promptly.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
As the workload grows, it is possible to expand the environment and manage additional processes while still maintaining centralized monitoring and control.
It is built for growing teams and has more complex automation capacity.
Whenever this became insufficient, we could easily reach out to the Tines team where they immediately gave us a remedy or fixed the issue.
From the workloads we have, it can scale for different workflows and add more workflows.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
Regarding stability, I would give Control-M a ten.
In my experience, once workflows and jobs are properly configured, it runs reliably and handles scheduled processes consistently.
The tool is stable up to ninety-nine point nine percent.
Tines is very stable.
Its AI improves the speed and quality of security workflows when analyzing large amounts of information.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
I would like Tines to improve by adding more advanced AI features that can help automatically analyze security alerts, summarize incidents, recommend response actions, and identify patterns from previous incidents.
Reporting and dashboards could be more advanced for deeper analysis.
The issue with the Implode action is that once we get a certain number of events into the Implode action, we lose context of all the events except the last one that came in, so it is a bit difficult to send data back once it goes through the Implode action.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Tines required no setup cost since we just used their cloud tier and built everything with internal engineering resources.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is very good.
I did not handle the purchasing side, so I did not actually know the exact pricing or the licensing details.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
It helps in streamlining our security operations effectively and efficiently without requiring coding knowledge.
What stands out mostly about Tines's features is the integrations. It connects easily with tools such as Slack, emails, and spreadsheets, and it makes data moves automatically without much work.
Tines caught the failure and queued them automatically. We did not lose a single student log.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 1.4% |
| Tines | 1.4% |
| Other | 97.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 28 |
| Large Enterprise | 176 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Control-M, from BMC, provides robust orchestration capabilities for managing hybrid cloud workflows, available both on-premise and as a SaaS option. Control-M from BMC supports growing teams in automating and scheduling enterprise workload processes. Control-M serves as a versatile tool for businesses, enabling automation across diverse platforms like SAP, mainframes, and cloud environments. It simplifies job scheduling with an intuitive GUI and integrates with multiple applications and platforms. Users benefit from managed file transfers, role-based administration, and self-service portals, enhancing security and workflow management. While the platform offers comprehensive alerting, reporting, and batch impact management, feedback has highlighted areas for improvement such as more flexible job execution, enhanced reporting capabilities, and better integration with third-party tools. Additionally, licensing costs and support during upgrades are common concerns. Organizations value Control-M for its ability to facilitate secure file transfers and support business-critical operations, minimizing manual intervention and ensuring efficiency.
What are the key features of Control-M?
What benefits should you look for in Control-M reviews?
Control-M is instrumental in industries managing complex workflows and IT operations. In finance, it offers accurate real-time data processing. Supply chain sectors benefit from its orchestration capabilities to streamline operations and minimize disruption. IT departments leverage integration capabilities to optimize workflow processes, ensuring seamless application management.
Tines offers no-code and low-code automation for users to automate tasks without coding expertise, integrating seamlessly with APIs to enhance incident management and security operations.
Known for a vendor-neutral approach, Tines provides detailed documentation and live chat support, allowing for effective integration with other tools, scheduling capabilities, and streamlined processes that save time and effort. Users find it intuitive for efficient task handling, making manual intervention unnecessary. Challenges include the need for more comprehensive documentation and instructional videos, as well as improvements in AI integration and reporting aesthetics. Pricing is also noted as higher compared to alternatives.
What are the most important features of Tines?Tines primarily serves organizations in the security sector, automating security operations such as alert detection and managed detection and response. It's utilized extensively in security operation centers for tasks like phishing email processing, ticket creation, IOC investigations, and ticket assignments within enterprise security frameworks, with multiple teams delivering Tines services to enhance task handling efficiency.
We monitor all AI IT Support reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.