No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
CrowdStrike and Microsoft are both solutions in the Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) category. Additionally, 95% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...
Read 44 CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security reviews
  • 14,744 Views
  • 1,474 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 25, 2025

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and Microsoft Entra Permissions Management EOL are competing products in cybersecurity, focusing on cloud security and permission management. CrowdStrike tends to have an advantage in pricing and support, while Microsoft Entra is favored for its comprehensive features and perceived long-term value.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security offers real-time threat intelligence, advanced endpoint protection, and holistic visibility across cloud environments. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management EOL is known for its identity-centric access management, integration with Microsoft products, and comprehensive permissions oversight. CrowdStrike focuses on threat detection, whereas Microsoft Entra emphasizes identity and permissions security.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is recognized for straightforward deployment and robust customer support. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management EOL integrates well within Microsoft ecosystems but is sometimes perceived as less intuitive during deployment. Microsoft offers a cohesive experience for existing users.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security provides competitive pricing models with a favorable cost-to-benefit ratio, offering a strong return on investment through advanced security offerings. Microsoft Entra Permissions Management EOL might have higher initial setup costs but delivers strong ROI due to its enhanced security posture and integration advantages. CrowdStrike may be initially affordable, but Microsoft Entra is seen as offering greater long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) Report (Updated: October 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
October 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 920,336 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Se...
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (16th), Container Security (10th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (9th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (9th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (9th), Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (9th)
Microsoft Entra Permissions...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Manish Indupuri - PeerSpot reviewer
Manish Indupuri
senior DevOps engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Provides centralized visibility and real-time threat detection across multiple cloud accounts
Regarding how CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security can be improved, I would say they can improve their support. There were a couple of cases where we needed to escalate issues in order to get proper support. That part could use some tweaking on their end. Additionally, the recent incident during the last summer literally impacted our systems. We had some of our workloads that affected the business, and it was a difficult experience. Apart from that, it is a good tool and the experience with CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security has been excellent. We did not find any kind of issues, but if they could improve their response to security-related incidents and provide on-time support or better understand our concerns and address them accordingly, it could be very helpful. Regarding needed improvements, I think they should enhance automatic alerting with CI/CD scanning and reporting capabilities. Additionally, it would be better to implement Falcon sensor health monitoring so agents are always active. We could know how it is behaving and how it is treating our environment. That could be a little helpful.
Read full review
Sameer Bhat - PeerSpot reviewer
Sameer Bhat
Vice President at Goldman Sachs
Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem
Entra ID is the core of the identity management that we have. This is the key product that we are using. I am currently also looking into Entra Private Access because we are planning to deploy about 50,000 desktops into Azure and use Azure Virtual Desktop. We would like to give access to the users from the desktop to on-premises applications. I learned that Entra Private Access is a good solution. That is not yet GA, but that is what we are looking for. Entra provides a single pane of glass for managing user access, but because our company also integrates with Nebula API, only administrators use Entra's pane. A normal person who wants to get onboarded can do self-service using Nebula. The features for whitelisting and other things are definitely there. That is what we use specifically. Application IDs, enterprise applications, and all those things are already there, so we have more efficiency. There is also security because we usually do not allow user identities to get direct access to Azure resources. Usually, we use the service principles from Entra ID, so this way, it increases security. Entra has helped to save time for our IT administrators. We tend to automate a lot of things. We can do automation using Graph APIs and save time. It is hard to quantify the time savings, but there has been a medium amount of time savings. Entra has helped to save our organization money. We care about security and risk more than money, but it also saves money. We are premium customers, and because we have a commit-to-consume contract with Microsoft of multi-million dollars, the money does not come into it because we have to consume those resources.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security are Cloud Security Posture Management and Cloud Workload Protection, offering more visibility and protection across our cloud environment."
"It surfaces threats quickly, which has made a measurable difference for my team with fewer incidents."
"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security has had a positive impact on my organization by giving us the peace of mind we need to know that we are protected."
"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is practically perfect for providing visibility across all my cloud environments."
"The most valuable feature is the auto-detection capability for threat hunting and issuing advisories on remedies."
"It provides alerts on suspicious command executions, helping us safeguard our systems."
"It helps us by automatically blocking certain applications or activities."
"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is user-friendly and provides detection transparency, allowing us to present real-time documentation to our executives clearly explaining any detected issues."
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security pros
"Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"The solution integrates well with our infrastructure and other systems without any issues."
 

Cons

"For the past six months, we have been facing some issues. Because it is a cloud-based infrastructure, it has been getting slower."
"I think the UI could be improved, but the technical support said CrowdStrike will improve the UI in the near future. But right now, it’s so messy."
"The tool is expensive."
"I rate it a six because the visibility part, I feel, is a bit lacking."
"The tool could give us more templates so that people who are not updated with the platform can easily get acquainted with how to secure and utilize the product more."
"I would not say the tool's integration capabilities were straightforward because the complexity depends on the volume of the data."
"The UI part needs to be improved."
"The recent incident during the last summer literally impacted our systems. We had some of our workloads that affected the business, and it was a difficult experience."
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security cons
"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
"The solution's pricing and support services need improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is not too high, it is okay."
"It's an expensive package but does what it says it will do."
"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is very expensive for us. Last month, we had a big issue that took much time and money to resolve. It slowed down our business and required our management team to get involved. We had a problem similar to the "Blue Screen of Death" issue many US companies faced. This incident used up many of our IT resources in just a few months. That's why we're looking for a replacement tool now."
"It's an expensive product"
"I am not the one who handled the pricing. A different team worked on it, but it is pretty expensive."
"The pricing is fair for what you get. I'd rate them a solid nine out of ten in terms of pricing."
"CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is pricy."
"Its price is moderate."
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security pricing and cost advice
"We are a Fortune 500 company, so we always negotiate with Microsoft."
"The product cost is in the mid to high range."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business16
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise26
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?
I believe that CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is not expensive for United States-based companies. For Brazil, however, this pricing is very expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?
I am aware that just as we have a one-click sensor for faster deployment of the agent, there is probably a tool that will be available to deploy the sensor for container security. Falcon CAC and Fa...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM?
We use cloud security comprehensively, including CSPM, DSPM, AISPM, and CDR, not just for our organization, but because we are partners and provide services for our customers who are using cloud se...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Wiz vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
Wiz vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 5% of the time
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 5% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 4% of the time
AWS GuardDuty vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
AWS GuardDuty vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 4% of the time
AWS Security Hub vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Logo
AWS Security Hub vs CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
Compared 3% of the time
More CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security Competitors
TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 14% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 6% of the time
Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 6% of the time
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
October 2026
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security reportDownload CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
October 2026
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] reportDownload Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] product report
 

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon ASPM
CloudKnox Permissions Management
 

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security helps organizations stop cloud breaches from code to runtime. As CrowdStrike's cloud-native application protection platform (CNAPP), it combines real-time cloud detection and response with proactive cloud security to help security teams prevent, detect, investigate, and stop modern cloud attacks.

Industry-leading threat intelligence and AI-powered insights help security teams understand how adversaries operate, uncover evasive threats, and respond with confidence. The result is a stronger cloud security posture, faster investigations, and reduced mean time to detect and respond.

What are CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security's key features?

  • Real-Time Protection: Detects and responds to cloud attacks in real time.
  • Industry-Leading Adversary Intelligence: Turns intel into prioritized risk and threats.
  • Cloud Asset Visibility: Discovers and maps assets across the entire cloud estate.
  • Preemptive Security: Identities risks earlier in development to prevent insecure deployments.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

  • Faster Threat Detection and Response: Achieve up to 89% faster cloud detection and response
  • Improved Cloud Security Posture: Identify and prioritize high-risk vulnerabilities and misconfigurations faster
  • Reduce Blind Spots: Gain up to 72% faster ability to monitor the entire cloud estate
  • Compliance Assurance: Aids in maintaining industry standards.
  • Return on Investment: 264% Return on Investment over 3 year period

Organizations use Falcon Cloud Security to stop cloud breaches from code to runtime. It helps teams reduce blind spots, focus on the risks most likely to lead to a breach, and detect and respond to attacks faster. By connecting proactive cloud security with real-time detection and response, it strengthens security from development through production.

CrowdStrike

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] provides robust access control and identity management, enhancing security by optimizing permissions and reducing risk.

This advanced platform offers comprehensive capabilities designed to streamline identity management. It empowers organizations to manage permissions efficiently, enhancing security frameworks while addressing compliance needs. By focusing on visibility and control, it optimizes access to ensure the right resources are available to the right users, reducing excessive permission grants and potential security vulnerabilities.

What are the main features of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?
  • Advanced Visibility: Gain insights into permissions to identify and address security risks.
  • Access Optimization: Align permissions with actual usage to prevent over-privileged access.
  • Compliance Integration: Streamline compliance processes with built-in reporting tools.
What benefits should you consider when evaluating Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?
  • Improved Security Posture: Reduces risk by eliminating excessive permissions.
  • Enhanced Compliance: Eases regulatory compliance with robust auditing features.
  • Operational Efficiency: Saves time and resources by automating permission management.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] plays a crucial role in maintaining data integrity and regulatory compliance. Its implementation allows organizations to seamlessly integrate permission management into existing security infrastructures, providing tailored solutions that address sector-specific requirements and challenges.

Microsoft
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
October 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Tenable, Idira by Palo Alto Networks and others in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM). Updated: October 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.