CrowdStrike Observability vs Wazuh comparison

CrowdStrike Observability

Read 50 Wazuh reviews

36,157 Views
21,333 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 30, 2025

Wazuh and CrowdStrike Observability compete in integration and security monitoring solutions. While Wazuh is highly favored for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility in integration, CrowdStrike Observability offers superior data analysis and alerting features.

Features: Wazuh provides powerful vulnerability detection, compliance reporting, and ease of integration with various environments, especially suited for AWS. CrowdStrike Observability excels with advanced data visualization, intelligent alerting, and predictive analytics, ensuring effective threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Wazuh could enhance scalability, security features like AI integration, and reduce manual intervention required. CrowdStrike Observability needs improved response times, support effectiveness, and a more accessible pricing model for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Wazuh offers deployment flexibility across environments, though direct support requires payment and may have slow response times. CrowdStrike Observability provides robust support and flexible deployments, but its cost is high for smaller organizations.

Pricing and ROI: Wazuh benefits from being open-source and cost-effective, offering significant ROI for SMEs. CrowdStrike Observability, despite high costs, offers potential ROI with reduced detection times but may be cost-prohibitive for smaller businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Observability vs. Wazuh Report (Updated: December 2025).

CrowdStrike Observability vs. Wazuh

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Observability

Ranking in Log Management

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wazuh

Ranking in Log Management

1st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (2nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Observability is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 9.4%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Wazuh	9.4%
CrowdStrike Observability	0.7%
Other	89.9%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

HectorRios

IT COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS at Américas BPS

Has provided reliable alerts and helped identify infrastructure issues through detailed reporting

The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls. Additionally, they have the agent, but the presentation in the management console is excellent as we have observability end-to-end with the servers and all the services configured in the use cases. The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues. Identifying performance bottlenecks is important because they collect numerous MD5 or hash keys including movements or playbooks. The way they organize that in the console is excellent, allowing you to have reports detecting issues, which not only includes detection but also provides solutions to those issues.

Read full review

Rajin Sandira

Engineer - Information Security at N-Able (Pvt) Ltd

Has faced limitations in AI capabilities and pricing flexibility

Pricing-wise, Wazuh stands out, along with deployment flexibility and its documentation which is extremely good in comparison to Forti. The community support is also incredible. They have helped quite a bit because previously, we had a separate tool and management dashboard to do our compliance. With Wazuh, we receive that information without having to do anything extra. We just set up the SIEM and all of that information was automatically populated. The dashboards are very easy to understand and very quick with no lag or delay. I have experienced delays on Forti's dashboards, but not with Wazuh. Wazuh is quite good. In comparison to Forti, they are quite similar. They are very good at detection.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."

"The log aggregation and correlation of data are notable features that enhance our operations."

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."

"The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues."

"I find the most effective feature of CrowdStrike Observability to be its cloud vision and attack surface vision, which enhance network traffic analysis."

"CrowdStrike Observability is a signature-less solution where you don't need to update your endpoints or the CrowdStrike Observability agents regularly, and it is completely based on AI and ML search engines."

"The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls."

"The price is worth it."

More CrowdStrike Observability pros

"I like that the solution is on top of the Kubernetes stack."

"It allows you to aggregate all your logs in one place and provides a unified view to monitor your security environment."

"One of the most beneficial features of Wazuh, particularly in the context of security needs, is the machine learning data handling capability."

"The product’s interface is intuitive."

"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions."

"It is excellent in terms of visualization and indexing services, making it a powerful tool for malware detection."

"Wazuh is free and easy to use. It is also adjustable, and we can use it on the cloud and on-premises."

"It has efficient SCA capabilities."

More Wazuh pros

Cons

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"The customer service is not satisfactory for me. The support is only available in English, and my users in LATAM regions such as Peru and Colombia require local language support, which is not currently provided."

"Technical support received a rating of 4 out of 10."

"The pricing is very high and small companies cannot afford it. They should reduce the price because the backend infrastructure is the same."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial. Currently, there is a default ninety-day backup period."

"We had some difficulties at the beginning, but at this moment they are improving, so probably in some months I will give them a ten."

More CrowdStrike Observability cons

"The tool does not provide CTI to monitor darknet."

"When I face a challenge, I prefer not to spend too much time on it and may move to another solution that will give us the results."

"Log data analysis could be improved. My IT team has been looking for an alternative because they want better log data for malware detection. We are also doing more container implementation also, so we need better container security, log data analysis, auditing and compliance, malware detection, etc."

"The computing resources are consuming and do not make sense."

"An issue I noticed is with tag values in certain rules not functioning properly."

"The only challenge we faced with Wazuh was the lack of direct support."

"We would like to see more improvements on the cloud."

"Wazuh doesn't cover sources of events as well as Splunk. You can integrate Splunk with many sources of events, but it's a painful process to take care of some sources of events with Wazuh."

More Wazuh cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product price is neither too high nor too low."

"Wazuh is a good tool, but the open-source version has scalability limitations."

"Wazuh is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for use."

"The solution's cost is above the average."

"Wazuh is open-source, but you must consider the total cost of ownership. It may be free to acquire, but you spend a lot of time and effort supporting the product and getting it to a point where it's useful."

"Wazuh is totally free and open source. There are no licensing costs, only support costs if you need them."

"The current pricing is open source."

"The product is cheaper compared to other tools."

More Wazuh pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Observability?

The product at this moment is really good; CrowdStrike Observability is still working to improve it and they are including new features. At this time, I cannot provide an opinion about what else to...

What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Observability?

We are currently finishing the configuration of the solution, making the playbooks and configurations with the use cases. From CrowdStrike Observability, we use all the solution including XDR and a...

What advice do you have for others considering CrowdStrike Observability?

We did not use Falcon Sandbox or Falcon Exposure Management. We are using a local partner and they have a marketplace, but we are working with a local partner from Google. We are just customers, no...

What do you like most about Wazuh?

Wazuh is its flexibility and open-source nature, which allows us to tailor threat detection and response across diverse client environments. Its integration capabilities with SOAR, cloud platforms,...

What needs improvement with Wazuh?

Regarding compliance, I find it not stable. I do not recommend it for that purpose. It can comply with Wazuh NCA, which we have here in Saudi Arabia. Wazuh NCA has many frameworks starting with ECC...

What is your primary use case for Wazuh?

I have been working with Wazuh for two years, and I can explain how I use Wazuh. I did not use Wazuh as a SIEM solution. I use Wazuh as a tool for services we provide. This service is called compro...

Datadog vs CrowdStrike Observability

Comparisons

Compared 12% of the time

Lumen Security Log Monitoring vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Security vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 7% of the time

More CrowdStrike Observability Competitors

Security Onion vs Wazuh

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Stack vs Wazuh

Compared 9% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs Wazuh

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Wazuh

Compared 5% of the time

Elastic Security vs Wazuh

Compared 5% of the time

More Wazuh Competitors

Product Reports

CrowdStrike Observability

January 2026

Download CrowdStrike Observability product report

Download Wazuh product report

January 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Wazuh All-In-One Deployment

Overview

Unify security, log management, and observability with the new CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale module, the next evolution of Humio, including the all-new managed Falcon Complete LogScale service.

CrowdStrike

Wazuh offers an open-source platform designed for seamless integration into diverse environments, making it ideal for enhancing security infrastructure. Its features include log monitoring, compliance support, and real-time threat detection, providing effective cybersecurity management.

Wazuh stands out for its ability to integrate easily with Kubernetes, cloud-native infrastructures, and various SIEM platforms like ELK. It features robust MITRE ATT&CK correlation, comprehensive log monitoring capabilities, and detailed reporting dashboards. Users benefit from its file integrity monitoring and endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities, which streamline compliance and vulnerability assessments. While appreciated for its customization and easy deployment, room for improvement exists in scalability, particularly in the free version, and in areas such as threat intelligence integration, cloud integration, and container security. The platform is acknowledged for its strong documentation and technical support.

What are the key features of Wazuh?

MITRE ATT&CK Correlation: Streamlines threat analysis by correlating security data with known attack patterns.
Log Monitoring: Provides continuous oversight of log data to enhance security insights.
SIEM and ELK Integration: Simplifies centralization of security events and analytics.
Kubernetes Support: Ensures security measures align with containerized environments.
File Integrity Monitoring: Alerts on unauthorized changes to critical files.
Endpoint Detection and Response: Identifies and mitigates endpoint threats efficiently.
Compliance and Benchmarking: Built-in rules assist in meeting regulatory standards.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers an affordable open-source security solution tailored for extensive customization.
Customization: Users can adjust features to fit unique security requirements.
Scalability: Facilitates growth by adapting to expanding security needs.
Comprehensive Support: Backed by detailed documentation and technical expertise.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to industry-specific regulations.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Wazuh is utilized for its capabilities in log aggregation, threat detection, and vulnerability management. Companies often implement its features to ensure compliance with stringent regulations and to enhance security practices across cloud environments. By leveraging its integration capabilities, organizations can achieve unified security management, ensuring comprehensive protection of their digital assets.