CrowdStrike Observability vs Datadog comparison

CrowdStrike Observability

Read 211 Datadog reviews

24,375 Views
8,531 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Datadog and CrowdStrike Observability are prominent competitors in the monitoring and observability tools category. Based on the comparison, Datadog has an upper hand in integration robustness and ease of use, while CrowdStrike excels in predictive analytics and data centralization.

Features: Datadog's most valuable features include a wide range of integrations, anomaly detection, and API functionalities. Its running in a hosted environment relieves users from infrastructure maintenance, offering seamless integration with cloud services like AWS. CrowdStrike Observability is notable for its predictive analytics, extensive data centralization capabilities, and detailed attack surface visibility, which provide deep insights into potential security threats.

Room for Improvement: Datadog users find the interface and alert functionality could be improved along with cost management tools and logging performance. Simplification of integrations is also desired. CrowdStrike Observability requires improvement in customer issue handling as response times need enhancement, and there is a noted complexity in module integration and cross-product data correlation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog is praised for its user-friendly interface and deployment across hybrid, public, and private clouds. Its support team is knowledgeable, although response times can vary. CrowdStrike Observability, while flexible in deployment, could improve technical support responsiveness to match the streamlined experience offered by Datadog.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog is known for its competitive pay-as-you-use pricing model, although it can become costly with increased log volumes and integrations. Nonetheless, it provides significant time and resource savings. CrowdStrike Observability's steep pricing is similar to premium tools, potentially being cost-prohibitive for smaller enterprises. However, its security offerings justify the expense for larger organizations requiring comprehensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Observability vs. Datadog Report (Updated: December 2025).

CrowdStrike Observability vs. Datadog

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Observability

Ranking in Log Management

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Datadog

Ranking in Log Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

211

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Container Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), AI Observability (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Observability is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 4.5%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Datadog	4.5%
CrowdStrike Observability	0.7%
Other	94.8%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

HectorRios

IT COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKS at Américas BPS

Has provided reliable alerts and helped identify infrastructure issues through detailed reporting

The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls. Additionally, they have the agent, but the presentation in the management console is excellent as we have observability end-to-end with the servers and all the services configured in the use cases. The intelligent alerting feature is excellent and configured on our console, being highly effective as it detects real alerts and just warnings or real issues. Identifying performance bottlenecks is important because they collect numerous MD5 or hash keys including movements or playbooks. The way they organize that in the console is excellent, allowing you to have reports detecting issues, which not only includes detection but also provides solutions to those issues.

Read full review

Dhroov Patel

Site Reliability Engineer at Grainger

Has improved incident response with better root cause visibility and supports flexible on-call scheduling

Datadog needs to introduce more hard limits to cost. If we see a huge log spike, administrators should have more control over what happens to save costs. If a service starts logging extensively, I want the ability to automatically direct that log into the cheapest log bucket. This should be the case with many offerings. If we're seeing too much APM, we need to be aware of it and able to stop it rather than having administrators reach out to specific teams. Datadog has become significantly slower over the last year. They could improve performance at the risk of slowing down feature work. More resources need to go into Fleet Automation because we face many problems with things such as the Ansible role to install Datadog in non-containerized hosts. We mainly want to see performance improvements, less time spent looking at costs, the ability to trust that costs will stay reasonable, and an easier way to manage our agents. It is such a powerful tool with much potential on the horizon, but cost control, performance, and agent management need improvement. The main issues are with the administrative side rather than the actual application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The price is worth it."

"I find the most effective feature of CrowdStrike Observability to be its cloud vision and attack surface vision, which enhance network traffic analysis."

"In the logs and the trajectory, it shows detailed information about where the source of infection comes from, how it travels, and how to reach there."

"The best features of CrowdStrike Observability include the way they show issues to the client or agent, and their data collection method is interesting because they use an agent-less approach in some cases, collecting data from infrastructure such as firewalls."

"CrowdStrike Observability is a signature-less solution where you don't need to update your endpoints or the CrowdStrike Observability agents regularly, and it is completely based on AI and ML search engines."

"CrowdStrike Observability offers strong predictive analytics capabilities, and the intelligent alerting system helps minimize noise and optimize IT resources effectively."

"The intelligence database provided by CrowdStrike is very impressive."

"The log aggregation and correlation of data are notable features that enhance our operations."

More CrowdStrike Observability pros

"The platform appeals to companies spanning many industries on a global scale."

"Datadog has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to look at things such as Cloud Spend and make sure our services are running at an optimal performance level."

"With Datadog I can look at the health of the technology stack and services."

"Datadog has so far been a breeze to use and set up."

"Datadog has a lot of features to be able to drill down deep into the swath of logs that our platforms generate."

"The dashboards are great."

"Having a clear view, not only of our infrastructure but our apps and services as well, has brought a great added value to our customers."

"It has enhanced the performance of my team."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"We had some difficulties at the beginning, but at this moment they are improving, so probably in some months I will give them a ten."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial. Currently, there is a default ninety-day backup period."

"Integration with Huawei should be more straightforward."

"We had some difficulties at the beginning, but at this moment they are improving, so probably in some months I will give them a ten."

"The customer service is not satisfactory for me. The support is only available in English, and my users in LATAM regions such as Peru and Colombia require local language support, which is not currently provided."

"Technical support received a rating of 4 out of 10."

"For reporting or log management, having a longer duration for backup without needing to purchase a paid subscription would be beneficial."

More CrowdStrike Observability cons

"The Log Explorer could be better. I don't think it has log manipulation as Splunk does."

"Graph filters for logs need to be set manually which works well for JSON but not for unstructured logs."

"The pricing nowadays is quite complex."

"The incident management beta looks promising, but it is still missing the ability to automatically create incidents based on certain alerts."

"The monitors need improvement."

"More helpful log search keywords/tips would be helpful in improving Datadog's log dashboard."

"I would also like to see an improvement in the server's data extraction times, as sometimes it can take up to ten minutes to download a report for a critical issue that is costing us money."

"It is very difficult to make the solutions fit perfectly for large organizations, especially in terms of high cardinality objects and multi-tenancy, where the data needs to be rolled up to a summarized level while maintaining its individual data granularity and identifiers."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing came up a bit compared to their competitors. It is not that the price has risen, but that the competitors have gone down. They keep adding more features that I would have expected to be baked in at a more nominal price. I have been increasingly dissatisfied with the pricing, but not enough to jump ship."

"Our licensing fees are paid on a monthly basis."

"If you do your homework, you'll find that if you're really concerned with cost, it's good."

"Licensing is based on the retention period of logs and metrics."

"The tool is open-source."

"The solution is fairly priced but history and log storage can get costly depending on your needs."

"Pricing seems reasonable. It depends on the size of your organization, the size of your infrastructure, and what portion of your overall business costs go toward infrastructure."

"Pricing seemed easy until the bill came in and some things were not accounted for."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	80
Midsize Enterprise	46
Large Enterprise	99

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CrowdStrike Observability?

The product at this moment is really good; CrowdStrike Observability is still working to improve it and they are including new features. At this time, I cannot provide an opinion about what else to...

What is your primary use case for CrowdStrike Observability?

We are currently finishing the configuration of the solution, making the playbooks and configurations with the use cases. From CrowdStrike Observability, we use all the solution including XDR and a...

What advice do you have for others considering CrowdStrike Observability?

We did not use Falcon Sandbox or Falcon Exposure Management. We are using a local partner and they have a marketplace, but we are working with a local partner from Google. We are just customers, no...

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

Wazuh vs CrowdStrike Observability

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Lumen Security Log Monitoring vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 7% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs CrowdStrike Observability

Compared 7% of the time

More CrowdStrike Observability Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 3% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

CrowdStrike Observability

February 2026

Download CrowdStrike Observability product report

Download Datadog product report

February 2026

Overview

Unify security, log management, and observability with the new CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale module, the next evolution of Humio, including the all-new managed Falcon Complete LogScale service.

CrowdStrike

Datadog integrates extensive monitoring solutions with features like customizable dashboards and real-time alerting, supporting efficient system management. Its seamless integration capabilities with tools like AWS and Slack make it a critical part of cloud infrastructure monitoring.

Datadog offers centralized logging and monitoring, making troubleshooting fast and efficient. It facilitates performance tracking in cloud environments such as AWS and Azure, utilizing tools like EC2 and APM for service management. Custom metrics and alerts improve the ability to respond to issues swiftly, while real-time tools enhance system responsiveness. However, users express the need for improved query performance, a more intuitive UI, and increased integration capabilities. Concerns about the pricing model's complexity have led to calls for greater transparency and control, and additional advanced customization options are sought. Datadog's implementation requires attention to these aspects, with enhanced documentation and onboarding recommended to reduce the learning curve.

What are Datadog's Key Features?

Sharable Dashboards: Facilitate collaboration with customizable, intuitive dashboards.
Extensive Integrations: Seamlessly connects with tools like Slack and AWS to support workflows.
APM and RUM: Provides deep insights into application performance and user interactions.
Real-Time Tools: Enables agile responses to system issues with real-time monitoring.
Unified Tagging and Visualization: Eases management of complex systems with simplified visualization.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Look For?

Efficient Troubleshooting: Centralized logging speeds up the identification and resolution of issues.
Streamlined Workflows: Integrations with popular tools enhance operational efficiency.
Improved Observability: Comprehensive monitoring improves system reliability and performance.
Resource Optimization: Efficient microservices and container management leads to better cloud resource utilization.
Responsive Alerts: Customizable alerts ensure timely identification of critical issues.

In industries like finance and technology, Datadog is implemented for its monitoring capabilities across cloud architectures. Its ability to aggregate logs and provide a unified view enhances reliability in environments demanding high performance. By leveraging real-time insights and integration with platforms like AWS and Azure, organizations in these sectors efficiently manage their cloud infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance and proactive issue resolution.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's