CucumberStudio vs TestRail comparison

The compared SmartBear and IDERA solutions aren't in the same category. SmartBear is ranked #24 in RADS , with an average rating of 7.5, and holds a 0.5% mindshare in the category. IDERA is ranked #2 in TMT , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

CucumberStudio

Read 12 CucumberStudio reviews

615 Views
320 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

TestRail

Read 24 TestRail reviews

1,521 Views
1,278 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CucumberStudio

TestRail

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CucumberStudio

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (24th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (9th)

TestRail

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. CucumberStudio is designed for Rapid Application Development Software and holds a mindshare of 0.5%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
TestRail, on the other hand, focuses on Test Management Tools, holds 7.9% mindshare, down 12.2% since last year.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CucumberStudio	0.5%
Microsoft Power Apps	9.9%
ServiceNow	7.2%
Other	82.4%

Rapid Application Development Software

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
TestRail	7.9%
OpenText Application Quality Management	9.0%
Tricentis qTest	8.7%
Other	74.4%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Walter Wirch

Technical Expert at Bertelsmann SE & Co.

Facilitates integration of test scenarios while needing modernization of components

CucumberStudio is primarily used for designing test scenarios and automating testing. We have implemented it in conjunction with our own routines for integration into our infrastructure CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing. It supports our product owners in designing…

Read full review

ChristineAnderssen

Release and Test Manager at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Provides quick test management for agile workflows but lacks customization for reporting and dashboards

The analytics and reporting capabilities in TestRail are not very extensive and tailorable. This doesn't make it very suitable for enterprise level programs. With OpenText, you have a lot of flexibility. I'm talking about the old version of ALM, the desktop client, which I used when it was still Micro Focus ALM. It has a tremendous ability to generate different types of reports. You can build different graphs, have Word document format, Excel format, or write your own Excel queries and incorporate that into your own reporting. TestRail has one type of format. If you want to generate a test summary report, there is basically only one format that you can use. You can't add your own components. You can choose which portions of your test results you want to include by selecting certain sections, but you don't have freedom to add and remove sections yourself. It's predefined and all that you can do is just take out the ones that you don't want. It is usable, but it's not tailorable, it's not configurable, it just gives you the bare minimum. It depends on what you use the tool for. If you want to use TestRail for enterprise-level waterfall projects with traditional reporting and a lot of analytics, it's not good enough because the analytics, dashboards, and reporting are not really there. However, if you use it for agile and you want quick and easy with very simple functionality, then it's very good because it's simple to use. For agile use cases, it's great and you don't need more than that. But if you are looking for an enterprise tool or waterfall project with large programs, even the enterprise version is not sufficient. There's no significant difference from the basic version. The only thing that you really get is the ability to have multiple project reporting, but the reporting itself is limited. There are no configurable dashboards. You can report across multiple projects, which is great, but the type of reports that you can run are limited to the current set of built-in reports. That's not good enough for enterprise level with multiple project and large programs. You want multiple reports across multiple projects and you want the tailorability and configurability of having dashboards and analytics, which TestRail is weak on for the enterprise level.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The URL is very useful, and it has a very good UI for deploying information of the scenarios created."

"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of CucumberStudio is its use of action words, which allows me to avoid writing test cases from scratch for the most common scenarios."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"CucumberStudio has a very user-friendly interface."

"The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."

"CucumberStudio aligns with our strategy for data-driven testing."

"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."

"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."

"The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition."

"The biggest advantage of using TestRail is its simplicity and intuitive interface."

"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."

"I have integrated TestRail, Leapwork, and Jira together using PowerShell scripting, so when we have 100 test cases and before every release goes out to our customers, we kick off the regression run in Leapwork, and at runtime, when the test case passes, it reflects the results on TestRail, and if it fails, it automatically creates a Jira story and sends that story to our backlog for further investigation."

"It's very easy to use and simple with a low level of complexity. There are pros and cons with complex tools, but the advantage of TestRail is that it fits in really well with an agile life cycle."

"The ability to time test runs gives the tester the ability to compare calculated times to actual times it takes for a test case to run."

More TestRail pros

Cons

"A key area for improvement is to revamp outdated components such as HipTest publisher."

"CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design."

"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."

"Another kind of deployment might be useful, perhaps an option to install the tool in a local deployment."

"I would like to see better customer support."

"The reporting needs to be improved."

"It would be nice if they would add an export to Word."

"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."

"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."

"It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be."

"The analytics and reporting capabilities in TestRail are not very extensive and tailorable. This doesn't make it very suitable for enterprise level programs."

"The product is not focused on synthetic data creation. I would also like to see more integrations with other platforms."

"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."

"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."

More TestRail cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

"The price of the solution is based on how many users you have per year. When you grow, it is segmented, For example, 10 to 25, you have a price, and more than 50, or 100, you need to take the enterprise license. I don't think we will reach this point."

"The solution is quite reasonably priced for what it offers and offers a monthly subscription model."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

More TestRail pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hiptest?

CucumberStudio's API integration could be improved both in terms of reliability and design. The API requires data to be sent in a specific format, which takes time to build. Additionally, the repor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiptest?

I use CucumberStudio as a test case repository. All of our test cases are stored there. It is also part of our test planning process. For every sprint, we plan the test cases in CucumberStudio and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Hiptest?

For teams following a BDD style software development approach, CucumberStudio is a great collaborative tool that covers all the basic requirements of a test management tool. I would rate CucumberSt...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestRail by Gurock?

Pricing is reasonable for TestRail. It offers good value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestRail by Gurock?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TestRail by Gurock?

I'm running an agile release train and we use TestRail for agile testing, mostly for manual testing, to keep track of test statuses. We link it directly to our user stories and execute our test cas...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub CoPilot vs CucumberStudio

Compared 33% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs CucumberStudio

Compared 28% of the time

More CucumberStudio Competitors

Tricentis qTest vs TestRail

Compared 16% of the time

TFS vs TestRail

Compared 8% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs TestRail

Compared 7% of the time

Katalon Test Ops vs TestRail

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs TestRail

Compared 3% of the time

More TestRail Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

January 2026

Download CucumberStudio product report

Buyer's Guide

TestRail

January 2026

Download TestRail product report

Also Known As

Hiptest

TestRail by Gurock

Overview

Formerly HipTest: CucumberStudio is the leading collaboration platform for BDD - an easy-to-use tool to define ideas, test code, and learn in production from real-time insight.

SmartBear

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!

IDERA

Sample Customers

Cisco, Cardinal Health, Intuit, Smartbox, Accenture, Deliveroo

Apple, Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, NASA, Amazon, HP, Samsung

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.