Katalon Test Ops vs TestRail comparison

"Katalon Test Ops has AI features that speed up the process by automating tasks that would otherwise be done manually."

"I noticed that only the enterprise version has integration with GitHub."

"It's more user-friendly as a solution."

"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."

"It's very easy to use and simple with a low level of complexity. There are pros and cons with complex tools, but the advantage of TestRail is that it fits in really well with an agile life cycle."

"I use the solution for test management."

"The product helps us create test cases and reports."

"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."

"The most valuable features of TestRail by Gurock are the user experience, it's very easy to learn. There is no learning curve needed to work on projects and manage the test cases, it is easy. Exporting and importing are simple."

"Reliable and stable. It is important that TestRail be up and running 24/7 as we have users around the world using it."

"The biggest advantage of using TestRail is its simplicity and intuitive interface."

"There are stability troubles. My area does not have a good connection. That's why sometimes I face issues."

"The free version is limited."

"The execution module of Katalon Test Ops may need some improvement, especially when running a high volume of test scripts."

"The test suite management has room for improvement as well as better reporting."

"Reporting could be more flexible regarding repeating reports."

"The analytics and reporting capabilities in TestRail are not very extensive and tailorable. This doesn't make it very suitable for enterprise level programs."

"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."

"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."

"The reports should be more user-friendly."

"TestRail should improve its pricing."

"I do see room for lots of improvement in it. In terms of usability, duplication with test cases and constant creation of projects isn't easy. There is also too much API integration into automation tools, which is not there in ALM with UFT. Instead of setting it up as a project and using it, we set it up as a system for usability. It also lacks in the traceability aspect. For traceability, you need to use the JIRA plugin and drag traceability on JIRA, but the functionality is still quite limited. The biggest gap is mainframe testing. It would be good if I could start with mainframe testing. Manual granting of access is another issue. There is no API that I could use with another system where it is automated. There is an API for loading somebody to a project but not for adding to the application."

"The product is not much expensive."

"Its price is definitely not more. If they introduce automation, they can charge more."

"Negotiate the best deal you can."

"Use TestRail Cloud (online TR hosted server) and don't worry about maintenance or scalability. It saves a lot of cash and time."

"The product has a reasonable price in terms of the features."

"My advice to others is to shop around for the best deal. Some options out there are free in cyberspace."

"I give the price a five out of ten."

"Pricing for small teams seems correct with respect to competitors."