CyberArk Identity vs IBM Security Verify Access comparison

CyberArk and IBM are both solutions in the Identity Management (IM) category. CyberArk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4, while IBM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. CyberArk holds a 2.1% mindshare in IAM, compared to IBM’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 29 CyberArk Identity reviews

4,893 Views
1,517 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Security Verify Access

Read 8 IBM Security Verify Access reviews

2,670 Views
881 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

IBM Security Verify Access

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

CyberArk Identity and IBM Security Verify Access compete in the security domain. IBM Security Verify Access stands out due to its extensive features, making it a preferred choice for many.

Features: CyberArk Identity users appreciate its identity management, secure authentication, and advanced user monitoring. IBM Security Verify Access is valued for its access control mechanisms, integration options, and detailed auditing capabilities. Users find IBM's features more comprehensive and nuanced, particularly for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Users of CyberArk Identity suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities, mobile interface, and user training materials. IBM Security Verify Access users highlight the need for a more intuitive setup process, improved documentation, and better customer support channels.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Identity is generally praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. IBM Security Verify Access, while rich in features, has more complex deployment requirements that can lead to longer implementation times. Users of IBM also report mixed experiences with customer service, pointing to a need for more consistent support quality.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Identity users feel they receive good value for their investment with lower initial setup costs and satisfactory ROI. IBM Security Verify Access, despite higher setup costs, is deemed worth the price due to its advanced functionalities and long-term benefits in large-scale deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

8th

Ranking in Access Management

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (9th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (7th)

IBM Security Verify Access

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

17th

Ranking in Access Management

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (15th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 2.1%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Security Verify Access is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Identity	2.1%
IBM Security Verify Access	1.5%
Other	96.4%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Hariharan Thangasamy

Cybersecurity Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Has strengthened privileged access control and improved audit visibility through session monitoring and password rotation

On the identity product side, it is awesome. However, they can improve in the documentation parts. For example, if there is a migration process, I can see the maximum customers are moving from self-hosted to on-premises or from on-premises to the cloud. It would be helpful if they released a generalized document for processes such as migration. A clear overview document would assist us in understanding more about the tool, configurations, and automations to enhance our security. Regarding the initial setup of CyberArk Identity, I faced some challenges. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components. I could not find the proper documentation in the community portal.

Read full review

Ateeq Rehman

Unit Head System Implementor at Allied Bank Limited

Has improved secure user access while managing development through multiple technologies

I have already explained this in my previous call; I don't handle financial terms and commercials. Pricing is generally managed by functional teams and management looking after licensing matters. In Pakistan, vendors such as Oracle and IBM manage account relationships with clients and have tailored pricing models, so I do not have sufficient insights into that aspect.IBM Security Verify Access installation process is not straightforward; it requires underlying specialized knowledge upon which the IBM products are based. The complexity and scalability of the architecture necessitate in-depth technical knowledge and understanding of the system. Thus, installation is not as simple as clicking through; it requires extensive configuration of the underlying application servers, such as IBM WebSphere, where these products are deployed and configured.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."

"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."

"I find the CyberArk Identity portal quite intuitive; it has changed a lot over the last year and a half and if you think logically and understand your environment, it is easy to establish a suitable setup for yourself and all your vendors."

"The tool is a very strong and valuable enterprise solution, particularly in ensuring the continuity of service."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."

"The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS."

"The setup, via cloud, is simple."

"The features are really powerful, providing really good SSO and MFA features and implementation capability, plus an MDM solution, and the cloud-based setup is simple and scalable."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"From the integration point of view, it supports SAML, OIDC, and OAuth; for legacy applications that don't have support for SAML and other new protocols, it provides single sign-on access to end-users, and from the integration compatibility point of view, it is highly capable."

"The tool provides a password vault, single sign-on, and multifactor authentication. It offers various authentication methods like fingerprint integration, one-time passwords, or tokens sent via email or SMS. This ensures secure access to your accounts by providing multiple authentication options."

"Its stability and UI are most valuable."

"I have found this solution to be really practical and when a user wants to log in, it is effortless and runs smooth."

"It can do a lot of different functions, and different types of teams can use this product for a variety of use cases, such as RSA, OTP, and single sign-on functionalities."

"It's a good solution for identification and access management."

"IBM Security Access Manager is a very good solution, so my company is still using it."

More IBM Security Verify Access pros

Cons

"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."

"The user interface could be improved."

"Something they could improve is the management of multifactor authentication. When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process."

"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."

"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

"Room for improvement for CyberArk Identity might be on the support side, as they constantly improve with new features and remove redundant ones, integrating multiple steps into a single one for easier use; however, this is not just CyberArk Identity, as many vendors start with basic troubleshooting services without recognizing that knowledgeable users often reach out after exhausting those options."

"Some areas experience slowness based on the workload. There's a need to enhance network performance despite the good user experience with access management."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved, but the main area is the lack of customization. You cannot easily customize anything in the product."

"For small or medium-sized businesses they cannot afford this solution."

"What we'd like improved in IBM Security Access Manager is its onboarding process as it's complex, particularly when onboarding new applications. We need to be very, very careful during the onboarding. We have no issues with IBM Security Access Manager because the solution works fine, apart from the onboarding process and IBM's involvement in onboarding issues. If we need support related to the onboarding, we've noticed a pattern where support isn't available, or they don't have much experience, or we're not getting a response from them. We're facing the same issue with IBM Guardium. As we're just focusing on the multi-factor authentication feature of IBM Security Access Manager and we didn't explore any other features, we don't have additional features to suggest for the next release of the solution, but we're in discussion about exploring ID management and access management features, but those are just possibilities because right now, we're focused on exploring our domain."

"They can improve the single sign-on configuration for OIDC and OAuth. That is not very mature in this product, and they can improve it in this particular area."

"The user interface needs to be simplified, it's complex and not user-friendly."

"Configuration could be simplified for the end-user."

"The solution could be classified as a hilt system. There are a lot of resources being used and it is suitable for very large enterprises or the public sector."

More IBM Security Verify Access cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

"I think it is a fairly priced tool. I rate the tool between six and seven on a scale of one to ten where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

"It costs about 300K AED for a year. Its pricing is a bit on the higher end, but in comparison to other products in the market, its price is still better. There are lots of other products that are very costly."

"The license and costs depend on the amount range of users you have. For just approximately 2,000 users, the price is practical and fair. However, when you have 20,000 users, it starts to become really expensive, and the discount per user is not attractive enough to go ahead and purchase."

"The product is not expensive. It depends on the number of users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

We do not specifically use the password vaulting feature of CyberArk Identity. The centralized user dashboard of CyberArk Identity has not been that important for us. If it would be possible to sha...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CyberArk Identity?

It's not being purchased through AWS, but we're using CyberArk Identity as a SaaS solution. I think it's running on AWS, but we bought it directly from CyberArk.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Security Access Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Security Access Manager?

We are still using the IBM BPM platform to automate the processes for our organization.I generally use Microsoft Project for project planning and schedule management, especially in relation to Orac...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Security Access Manager?

My current domain is leading project development, overseeing both technical and functional areas in process automation and orchestration, along with the hands-on implementation of process automatio...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Okta Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 4% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Okta Platform vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 9% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Cloud Identity Service vs IBM Security Verify Access

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Security Verify Access Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

April 2026

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Security Verify Access

April 2026

Download IBM Security Verify Access product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

IBM Security Verify Access (SVA), IBM Security Access Manager, ISAM

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

IBM Security Verify Access offers adaptable access management with multi-factor authentication, seamless protocol integration, and strong user management, suitable for cloud and on-premises environments.

IBM Security Verify Access provides multi-factor authentication, seamless integration with protocols like SAML and OAuth, and features including password vaults and single sign-on. Its adaptable nature allows for deployment both in cloud and on-premises settings. Users appreciate its quick setup, reliable authorization, and efficient user management, especially when integrated with Active Directory. The intuitive interface enhances security with mobile features like QR code enrollment, making it suitable for diverse environments. However, cloud deployment could be simpler, and the interface could use enhancements for better ease. Onboarding applications and support availability need improvements, and configuration for OIDC and OAuth should mature. More comprehensive documentation and simplified installation are also needed, along with automation to reduce resource consumption.

What are the key features of IBM Security Verify Access?

Multi-Factor Authentication: Offers robust multi-layered security.
Integration with Protocols: Works with SAML and OAuth for seamless connectivity.
Password Vaults: Secure storage for user credentials.
Single Sign-On: Streamlines access across platforms.
Active Directory Integration: Ensures efficient user management.
Mobile Features: Includes QR code enrollment for enhanced security.

What benefits or ROI can users expect to find in the reviews?

Rapid Setup: Quick deployment in cloud and on-premises environments.
Reliable Authorization: Trustworthy access control and management.
Security Enhancements: Through multi-factor authentication and mobile features.
Streamlined Processes: Simplified access management with single sign-on.

IBM Security Verify Access is widely used in the banking and educational sectors for access management, supporting activities like single sign-on and control across different user groups. Many in these industries utilize it for customer authentication and integrate it with mobile systems to enhance security. Its adaptability allows it to serve complex needs, particularly useful in environments such as universities and financial institutions.

IBM

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

POST Luxembourg

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access

April 2026

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. IBM Security Verify Access report.

See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.