DataCore SANsymphony vs Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure comparison

DataCore and Red Hat are both solutions in the HCI category. DataCore is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.4, while Red Hat is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. DataCore holds a 2.6% mindshare in HCI, compared to Red Hat’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of DataCore users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

DataCore SANsymphony

Read 58 DataCore SANsymphony reviews

3,905 Views
2,070 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infr...

Read 7 Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure reviews

794 Views
786 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DataCore SANsymphony

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infr...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

DataCore SANsymphony and Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure compete in the enterprise IT domain. Red Hat often has an upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and perceived long-term value.

Features: DataCore SANsymphony features efficient storage management, advanced caching, and dynamic auto-tiering. Red Hat Hyperconverged offers containerization, automated management, and is tailored for scalability and flexibility.

Room for Improvement: DataCore could enhance integration with newer tech and expand its feature set for dynamic environments. Red Hat could improve its support for diverse storage architectures and refine its initial setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat integrates seamlessly with existing environments focusing on minimal downtime. DataCore's deployment aims to reduce complexity. DataCore offers strong customer support, while Red Hat enhances its support with comprehensive documentation and a community-driven approach.

Pricing and ROI: DataCore offers competitive setup costs focusing on operational savings. Red Hat incurs higher initial costs but offers substantial returns due to its scalability and future-ready features.

To learn more, read our detailed DataCore SANsymphony vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DataCore SANsymphony vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DataCore SANsymphony

Ranking in HCI

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Storage Software (2nd), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (4th), Storage Performance (3rd)

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infr...

Ranking in HCI

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

2.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the HCI category, the mindshare of DataCore SANsymphony is 2.6%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

HCI Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DataCore SANsymphony	2.6%
Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure	1.3%
Other	96.1%

HCI

Featured Reviews

SigfridCecillon

Owner at Arsium

High availability and user-friendliness enhance infrastructure health and redundancy

I would rate technical support from DataCore SANsymphony a 10. Each time I contact the technical support, it's when I don't have a choice because it's very difficult for me on site, and each time, I have good people online who are able to help me solve the problem. Usually, the problems are not very technically difficult, but sometimes they are, and the support team is still there to help us resolve them. The majority of the problems are linked to licensing, so when the license has expired or the number is not correct, they are proactive and change things live, which is very good.

Read full review

Maheshc Chathuranga

Senior Enterprise System Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Has provided mature containerization support and responsive assistance while meeting diverse customer needs

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure can be improved primarily because the biggest problem in Sri Lanka is its high price compared to other solutions. Feature-wise, it's very mature for the containerization side, but the price point is an issue. I would like to see more features related to disaster recovery and continuity in Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure, specifically disaster recovery, disaster recovery sites, and business continuity.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for us is that we can adjust the size of the storage very easily, without stopping production."

"It is a very stable solution."

"I'd have to say that the biggest improvement gained by using SANsymphony has to be the performance of the product."

"The dashboard is very intuitive, and there are many counters to diagnose what happens during a short period (like when a backup is in progress)."

"Active-active is the most valuable aspect for us."

"An advantage of SANsymphony is its ease of use, especially when installing or upgrading the system."

"It is a well-proven, automated management tool in all dynamic provisioning, auto-tiering, great performance, parallel I/O, cache speed mechanism, etc."

"DataCore has helped provide flexible, highly available, high-performance storage that otherwise would have been outside our price range."

More DataCore SANsymphony pros

"Both the scalability and stability of this solution are excellent."

"Utilizing Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure's software-defined storage helps increase data consistency for specific use cases, aligning with customer requirements, depending on which type of data we are storing."

"I like that you can add other types of services."

"The most useful feature is the solution's automation in terms of how we are able to spin up a certain workload in real-time when we are doing R&D."

"It is stable and scalable."

"The size of the hardware is what we need because it is very good for small configurations."

"The consolidation of the management in one control point is the most valuable. The whole infrastructure management is consolidated in just one console point. The documentation is also pretty good."

Cons

"The solution is constantly evolving."

"Having an enterprise "Storage Dashboard" that can show capacity, usage, performance, and any issues would be very beneficial."

"DataCore needs a more efficient and better way to keep track of metrics and counters so that we can do baseline analysis to measure performance."

"I think the performance reporting can be improved by adding historical statistics into a database for the purpose of comparing."

"DataCore should integrate its own file server into SANsymphony."

"Right now, the version used is run on Microsoft Windows Server. Having a Linux version or even an appliance would be better as it would eliminate the use of additional licensing for another piece of hardware."

"When I sometimes reboot for maintenance, the connectivity from the iSCSI initiator host could be improved."

"One limitation of this solution is that it's Windows-based, e.g. one requirement to install DataCore SANsymphony SDS is putting it on a Windows server machine. It relies on Windows and that is a limitation because there are some customers who are looking for non Windows systems."

More DataCore SANsymphony cons

"The cloud deployment could be improved."

"Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure can be improved primarily because the biggest problem in Sri Lanka is its high price compared to other solutions."

"It is not user-friendly, and it is very difficult to operate. You have to have a deep understanding of the technical details of the infrastructure to implement it. When you compare it with VMware, it is totally different because the graphical user interface is not that easy to understand. It is not intuitive. To use it, you have to read a lot of documentation and even understand what is going on behind the solution. It is not for someone who has a little bit of knowledge. Currently, it is too complex. I need something that is easy to implement. It should have a basic configuration as well as a complex configuration."

"This product is not so stable. Maybe it is just not mature enough in its development."

"Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure can be improved primarily because the biggest problem in Sri Lanka is its high price compared to other solutions."

"The licensing policy needs to be improved. They have a licensing policy based on the number of CPU sockets. Nowadays what has happened is that the license they are trying to move is based on the number of CPU cores. With the advancement in technology there are now more cores in a single CPU. It's been very challenging in terms of managing the license around everything. Today we have a processor with 24 and 32 cores on the same physical CPU."

"It should be more user-friendly, in my opinion."

"The main issue is the initial investment. It is an expensive product, and it should be cheaper. It should also be easier to use and manage. The professional service for this solution is quite complex and expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cost effective."

"Pricing has improved but it is still expensive."

"We have licensing costs on a yearly basis. They charge per terabyte, so in terms of cost, it can be very costly. They have three different features, and you have to pay extra for those."

"The cost is at the same level as other storage solutions and it is easy to understand the licensing."

"Make sure you are made aware of the annual subscription cost when purchasing."

"The pricing and licensing are better with DataCore."

"This solution allows the use of off-the-shelf hardware and charges by the TB of storage."

"This product has a good ratio between quality and price. In many cases, it's less expensive to work with DataCore than other storage systems."

More DataCore SANsymphony pricing and cost advice

"It is quite pricey."

"Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is an open-sourced, low-cost solution with full features."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DataCore SANsymphony SDS?

Before choosing DataCore SANsymphony, I did not evaluate other options.

See all answers

What do you like most about DataCore SANsymphony?

The dashboard is very intuitive, and there are a lot of counters to diagnose what happens during a short period (like when a backup is in progress).

See all answers

What needs improvement with DataCore SANsymphony?

DataCore SANsymphony can be improved with high availability as it offers synchronous mirroring between physical and separate sites to ensure business continuity and disaster recovery. I do not have...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure?

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is mainly used for customers' companies.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure?

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is not used for edge computing. Most people are referring to centralized data centers for requirements, and in Sri Lanka, there are not many edge computing sol...

See all answers

Comparisons

StarWind Virtual SAN vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 9% of the time

VMware vSAN vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp ONTAP vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 6% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 5% of the time

More DataCore SANsymphony Competitors

VMware vSAN vs Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

Compared 36% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

Compared 13% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

Compared 10% of the time

VxRail vs Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

Compared 10% of the time

Scale Computing Platform vs Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

Compared 4% of the time

More Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DataCore SANsymphony

January 2026

Download DataCore SANsymphony product report

Buyer's Guide

HCI

December 2025

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure report

Download Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure product report

Also Known As

DataCore Virtual SAN

Red Hat HCI, Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure for Virtualization

Overview

Experience peace of mind with DataCore SANsymphony, the ultimate software-defined storage solution alleviating storage management challenges. Say goodbye to the complexities of managing different storage tiers and disruptions with SANsymphony's block-level storage virtualization technology, empowering you to automate capacity provisioning and data placement across diverse storage environments including SAN, DAS, HCI, and JBOD. Break down silos, control data placement, meet business continuity objectives, boost performance, and seamlessly expand or refresh hardware with SANsymphony. Benefit from features like asynchronous replication for disaster recovery, minimizing data loss, accelerating application responsiveness, and integrating new technology non-disruptively. Trusted by industry leaders like NASA, Thorntons, Inc., and TUI Cruises, DataCore SANsymphony guarantees unparalleled flexibility, scalability, and reliability, ensuring uninterrupted data access and application availability while reducing storage costs and inefficiencies.

DataCore

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure - based on our leading OpenStack and virtualization platforms - provides co-located, scalable, software-defined compute and storage, driven by Red Hat Ansible Automation on economical, industry-standard hardware.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Volkswagen , Maimonides Medical Center, NASA, Thorntons, Inc., TUI, ISCO Industries, Pee Dee Electric Cooperative, United Financial Credit Union, Derby Supply Chain Solutions, Mission Community Hospital, Bellarmine College Preparatory, Colby-Sawyer College, Mount Sinai Health System, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Quorn Foods, Bitburger, University of Birmingham, Stadtverwaltung Heidelberg, NetEnt to name a few.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

DataCore SANsymphony vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

December 2025

Free Report: DataCore SANsymphony vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure

Find out what your peers are saying about DataCore SANsymphony vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DataCore SANsymphony vs. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure report.

See our list of best HCI vendors.

We monitor all HCI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.