Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Datadog vs Monte Carlo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Datadog
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
211
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), AI Observability (1st)
Monte Carlo
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (30th), Data Observability (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Datadog and Monte Carlo aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Datadog is designed for Cloud Monitoring Software and holds a mindshare of 6.7%, down 11.4% compared to last year.
Monte Carlo, on the other hand, focuses on Data Observability, holds 26.6% mindshare, down 34.4% since last year.
Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Datadog6.7%
Zabbix11.6%
PRTG Network Monitor4.8%
Other76.9%
Cloud Monitoring Software
Data Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Monte Carlo26.6%
Acceldata11.3%
Anomalo9.6%
Other52.49999999999999%
Data Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Dhroov Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Site Reliability Engineer at Grainger
Has improved incident response with better root cause visibility and supports flexible on-call scheduling
Datadog needs to introduce more hard limits to cost. If we see a huge log spike, administrators should have more control over what happens to save costs. If a service starts logging extensively, I want the ability to automatically direct that log into the cheapest log bucket. This should be the case with many offerings. If we're seeing too much APM, we need to be aware of it and able to stop it rather than having administrators reach out to specific teams. Datadog has become significantly slower over the last year. They could improve performance at the risk of slowing down feature work. More resources need to go into Fleet Automation because we face many problems with things such as the Ansible role to install Datadog in non-containerized hosts. We mainly want to see performance improvements, less time spent looking at costs, the ability to trust that costs will stay reasonable, and an easier way to manage our agents. It is such a powerful tool with much potential on the horizon, but cost control, performance, and agent management need improvement. The main issues are with the administrative side rather than the actual application.
reviewer2774796 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Governance System Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Data observability has transformed data reliability and now supports faster, trusted decisions
The best features Monte Carlo offers are those we consistently use internally. Of course, the automated DQ monitoring across the stack stands out. Monte Carlo can do checks on the volume, freshness, schema, and even custom business logic, with notifications before the business is impacted. It does end-to-end lineage at the field level, which is crucial for troubleshooting issues that spread across multiple extraction and transformation pipelines. The end-to-end lineage is very helpful for us. Additionally, Monte Carlo has great integration capabilities with Jira and Slack, as well as orchestration tools, allowing us to track issues with severity, see who the owners are, and monitor the resolution metrics, helping us collectively reduce downtime. It helps our teams across operations, analytics, and reporting trust the same datasets. The best outstanding feature, in my opinion, is Monte Carlo's operational analytics and dashboard; the data reliability dashboard provides metrics over time on how often incidents occur, the time to resolution, and alert fatigue trends. These metrics help refine the monitoring and prioritize our resources better. Those are the features that really have helped us. The end-to-end lineage is essentially the visual flow of data from source to target, at both the table and column level. Monte Carlo automatically maps the upstream and downstream dependencies across ingestion, transformation, and consumption layers, allowing us to understand immediately where data comes from and what is impacted when any issue occurs. Years ago, people relied on static documentation, which had the downside of not showing the dynamic flow or issue impact in real time. Monte Carlo analyzes SQL queries and transformations, plus metadata from our warehouses and orchestration tools, providing the runtime behavior for our pipelines. For instance, during network outages, our organization tracks metrics such as SAIDI and SAIFI used internally and for regulators. The data flow involves source systems such as SCADA, outage management systems, mobile apps for field crews, and weather feeds pushing data to the ingestion layer as raw outage events landing in the data lake. Data then flows to the transformation layer, where events are enriched with asset, location, and weather data, plus aggregations that calculate outage duration and customer impact, ultimately reaching the consumption layer for executive dashboards and regulatory reporting. Monte Carlo maps this entire food chain. Suppose we see a schema change in a column named outage_end_time and a freshness delay in downstream aggregated tables; the end-to-end lineage enables immediate root cause identification instead of trial and error. Monte Carlo shows that the issue is in the ingestion layer, allowing engineers to avoid wasting hours manually tracing SQL or pipelines, which illustrates how end-to-end lineage has really helped us troubleshoot our issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has provided visibility with ease of implementation and allowed multiple teams to quickly onboard it."
"The solution is sufficiently stable."
"I like how we can customize alerts, and when alerts have become too noisy, we turn their threshold down fairly easily."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"The most valuable aspects of the product include the APM and profiler."
"The dashboards are super convenient to us for a more zoomed out view of what is going on with each integration that we utilize."
"Datadog has positively impacted my organization by shortening our time to resolve incidents because it's a central place for getting all the data that we need for troubleshooting."
"For us to have visibility into our app stack and the hardware we run has been highly beneficial."
"It makes organizing work easier based on its relevance to specific projects and teams."
"Monte Carlo's introduction has measurably impacted us; we have reduced data downtime significantly, avoided countless situations where inaccurate data would propagate to dashboards used daily, improved operational confidence with planning and forecasting models running on trusted data, and enabled engineers to spend less time manually checking pipelines and more time on optimization and innovation."
 

Cons

"I'm not sure what kind of features are in the roadmap right now, but I encourage the development of features for defining your organization, and allowing the visibility of what kind of metrics you can get. Those features would be really useful for us."
"It could use some additional features when working with metrics like Grafana or like New Relic has. Datadog does not use library technologies like Dynatrace does. Datadog has machine learning too, but it does not have this option in all layers of monitoring like infrastructure service process in applications."
"The monitors need improvement."
"The on-premise version is very difficult to upgrade."
"A big problem with Datadog is the billing. They need to make the billing more user-friendly."
"The Log Explorer could be better. I don't think it has log manipulation as Splunk does."
"Graph filters for logs need to be set manually which works well for JSON but not for unstructured logs."
"One area where the product could be improved is Application Performance Monitoring (APM)."
"Some improvements I see for Monte Carlo include alert tuning and noise reduction, as other data quality tools offer that."
"For anomaly detection, the product provides only the last three weeks of data, while some competitors can analyze a more extended data history."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing through AWS Marketplace has been good. It would be nice if it was cheaper, but their pricing is reasonable for what it is. Sometimes, for their newer features, they charge as if it's fully fleshed out, even though it is a newer feature and it may have less stuff than their other items."
"I am not satisfied with its licensing. Its payment is based on the exported data, and there was an explosion of the data for three or four weeks. My customer was not alerted, and there was no way for them to see that there has been an explosion of data. They got a big invoice for one or two months. The pricing model of Datadog is based on the data. The customer was quite surprised about not being alerted about this explosion of data. They should provide some kind of alert when there is an increase in usage."
"They prefer monthly subscriptions."
"Licensing is based on the retention period of logs and metrics."
"Datadog does not provide any free plans to use the solution. When I start with a proof of concept it would be sensible to have a free plan to test the tool and check whether it fits the requirements of the project. Before the production stage, it is always good to have a free plan with some limited features, number of requests, or logs."
"The solution's pricing depends on project volume."
"​Pricing seems reasonable. It depends on the size of your organization, the size of your infrastructure, and what portion of your overall business costs go toward infrastructure."
"While it is an expensive product, I would rate the pricing level at four out of five."
"The product has moderate pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business80
Midsize Enterprise46
Large Enterprise99
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...
Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Microsoft and others in Cloud Monitoring Software. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.