Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Grafana vs Monte Carlo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Grafana
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (5th)
Monte Carlo
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (30th), Data Observability (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Grafana and Monte Carlo aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Grafana is designed for Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability and holds a mindshare of 3.6%, down 6.7% compared to last year.
Monte Carlo, on the other hand, focuses on Data Observability, holds 26.6% mindshare, down 34.4% since last year.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Grafana3.6%
Dynatrace6.6%
Datadog5.5%
Other84.3%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Data Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Monte Carlo26.6%
Acceldata11.3%
Anomalo9.6%
Other52.49999999999999%
Data Observability
 

Featured Reviews

BasilJiji - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Unified dashboards have empowered teams and have democratized real-time operational insights
Grafana's snapshot and dashboard sharing features are critical for our remote incident response. During production issues, I generate a public snapshot of a dashboard at a specific point and share the URL in our Slack war room so every engineer can see exactly what the metrics looked like when the error occurred. This helps significantly during the process of finding the root cause in those scenarios. The best features Grafana offers go beyond just pretty charts; it is an integration engine. The fact that I can join data from my SQL database with metrics from Prometheus in the same table is a feature I have not found performed as well elsewhere. My team uses this feature by comparing two different tables from the databases to show one single view, which Grafana is really helping with. In a visualized way, the charts can be displayed on one dashboard, allowing end users who are not familiar with these technical aspects to extract valuable data from it. Grafana has positively impacted our organization by democratizing data within our company. Before using Grafana, only developers could see the system health, but now our product managers and executives have their own high-level dashboards, which has improved cross-departmental transparency and alignment.
reviewer2774796 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Governance System Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Data observability has transformed data reliability and now supports faster, trusted decisions
The best features Monte Carlo offers are those we consistently use internally. Of course, the automated DQ monitoring across the stack stands out. Monte Carlo can do checks on the volume, freshness, schema, and even custom business logic, with notifications before the business is impacted. It does end-to-end lineage at the field level, which is crucial for troubleshooting issues that spread across multiple extraction and transformation pipelines. The end-to-end lineage is very helpful for us. Additionally, Monte Carlo has great integration capabilities with Jira and Slack, as well as orchestration tools, allowing us to track issues with severity, see who the owners are, and monitor the resolution metrics, helping us collectively reduce downtime. It helps our teams across operations, analytics, and reporting trust the same datasets. The best outstanding feature, in my opinion, is Monte Carlo's operational analytics and dashboard; the data reliability dashboard provides metrics over time on how often incidents occur, the time to resolution, and alert fatigue trends. These metrics help refine the monitoring and prioritize our resources better. Those are the features that really have helped us. The end-to-end lineage is essentially the visual flow of data from source to target, at both the table and column level. Monte Carlo automatically maps the upstream and downstream dependencies across ingestion, transformation, and consumption layers, allowing us to understand immediately where data comes from and what is impacted when any issue occurs. Years ago, people relied on static documentation, which had the downside of not showing the dynamic flow or issue impact in real time. Monte Carlo analyzes SQL queries and transformations, plus metadata from our warehouses and orchestration tools, providing the runtime behavior for our pipelines. For instance, during network outages, our organization tracks metrics such as SAIDI and SAIFI used internally and for regulators. The data flow involves source systems such as SCADA, outage management systems, mobile apps for field crews, and weather feeds pushing data to the ingestion layer as raw outage events landing in the data lake. Data then flows to the transformation layer, where events are enriched with asset, location, and weather data, plus aggregations that calculate outage duration and customer impact, ultimately reaching the consumption layer for executive dashboards and regulatory reporting. Monte Carlo maps this entire food chain. Suppose we see a schema change in a column named outage_end_time and a freshness delay in downstream aggregated tables; the end-to-end lineage enables immediate root cause identification instead of trial and error. Monte Carlo shows that the issue is in the ingestion layer, allowing engineers to avoid wasting hours manually tracing SQL or pipelines, which illustrates how end-to-end lineage has really helped us troubleshoot our issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It provides a graphical representation and it's clear to see what's happening."
"Grafana is stable and has great engineers."
"Grafana is stable and has great engineers."
"It has good stability."
"Great capacity planning and the solution has a great GUI."
"I find Grafana beneficial due to its numerous plugins."
"Grafana provides a user-friendly interface for viewing infrastructure metrics through dashboards."
"I find Grafana beneficial due to its numerous plugins."
"It makes organizing work easier based on its relevance to specific projects and teams."
"Monte Carlo's introduction has measurably impacted us; we have reduced data downtime significantly, avoided countless situations where inaccurate data would propagate to dashboards used daily, improved operational confidence with planning and forecasting models running on trusted data, and enabled engineers to spend less time manually checking pipelines and more time on optimization and innovation."
 

Cons

"It's difficult to see the trends on the graph when the range is too long."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"It would be helpful if they simplified the data source."
"Trigger limits are difficult to see in a graph."
"I find that the alerting UI in Grafana can be complex for new users."
"The features are complicated and not intuitive."
"Regarding joining between queries, merging between two queries that give the same information could be simple, and there are some ways to do that, but if there was something even easier, it would be great."
"The service dashboard is very hard and needs improvement."
"Some improvements I see for Monte Carlo include alert tuning and noise reduction, as other data quality tools offer that."
"For anomaly detection, the product provides only the last three weeks of data, while some competitors can analyze a more extended data history."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"​Grafana is free and open source.​"
"I give the price an eight out of ten."
"The solution is expensive."
"We use the open-source version of Grafana."
"Since Grafana is an open-source solution, it is free of cost."
"You need to purchase the solution's license for its commercial use."
"We are using the open-source license."
"My company uses the open-source version of Grafana, so it's free."
"The product has moderate pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise25
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Grafana?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana?
The costs associated with using Grafana are somewhere in the ten thousands because we are able to control the logs in a more efficient way to reduce it. That is pretty much great for us.
What needs improvement with Grafana?
Grafana could be improved through enhancement of graphs and visualizations and providing more integrations. Grafana is going to start working with OpenTelemetry, which would be helpful to have the ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.